# Nine claimants interrupting a parked reminder

Measured 2026-08-06 on homesrv against master at `70b32af`, so after V-560, V-565, V-567
and V-572. Probed through `POST /api/chat` on mavweb, three turns per scenario, an explicit
`отмена` between scenarios so each starts from an empty pending slot.

The question this answers: the Rome failure was one claimant eating one question. How many
other claimants do the same, and does routing first fix all of them or only weather?

## Time forms, no pending state

V-572 holds for every spoken shape, not just the one it was measured on.

| said | answered |
|---|---|
| `напомни в 11:00 позвонить маме` | `хорошо, напомню сегодня в 11:00.` |
| `напомни в 9 позвонить маме` | `хорошо, напомню сегодня в 09:00.` |
| `напомни в 9 утра позвонить маме` | `хорошо, напомню сегодня в 09:00.` |
| `напомни завтра в 9 купить молоко` | `хорошо, напомню завтра в 09:00.` |
| `напомни в девять позвонить маме` | `хорошо, напомню сегодня в 09:00.` |
| `напомни через час выпить воды` | `хорошо, напомню сегодня в 02:26.` |

The spelled-out `девять` works, which is the lexicon's oblique cardinals doing their job.

## The nine scenarios

Each opens with a reminder that names no time, so a clarify is parked. Then a different
claimant speaks.

| | interrupted by | claiming source | flow | verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | `какая сейчас погода в Риме?` | weather | dropped, announced | question answered |
| B | `что я говорил про отпуск?` | personal | dropped, announced | question answered |
| C | `какая столица Франции?` | search | dropped, announced | question answered |
| D | `у меня новый ноутбук` | none | kept | **note silently discarded** |
| E | `что у меня сегодня?` | none | completed wrongly | **reminder invented at the clock** |
| F | `что требует внимания?` | none | dropped, announced | question answered |
| G | `напомни завтра в 9 купить молоко` | none | dropped, announced | new reminder set |
| H | reminder said whole, then weather, then a repair | weather | none parked | **repair invents a note** |
| I | `сколько времени?` | none | dropped, announced | question answered |

Six of nine answer the interrupting utterance. That is what V-560 bought, and it is the
half of Rome that was broken.

## The three that fail

**E is the worst of the nine.**

```text
me:     напомни забрать посылку
maven:  Когда?
me:     что у меня сегодня?
maven:  хорошо, напомню сегодня в 01:28.
```

The agenda question is never answered and a reminder exists that nobody asked for, at the
current minute. Asked with nothing parked, the same sentence is answered by the calendar.
So stage 0 routes it correctly and the pending claimant runs in front of that route. This
is worse than the pre-V-560 Rome behaviour, which at least failed audibly. Filed as V-577.

**D drops a note without saying so.**

```text
me:     напомни позвонить врачу
maven:  Когда?
me:     у меня новый ноутбук
maven:  Во сколько напомнить?
```

Nothing wrong is written, and nothing right is either. Alone the sentence is stored. Also
V-577.

**H writes a note nobody dictated.**

```text
нет, не маме, а папе  ->  Сохранила заметку о том, что ты поедешь на дачу.
```

Reproduced with no pending state at all, twice, with two different inventions. The stored
body is generated rather than captured. Filed as V-576. It is the only defect here that outlives
the turn. A wrong note is indexed and comes back later as recall.

## What the drop notice looks like now

Six scenarios answer the question and say `Прошлую просьбу отпускаю.` first. That sentence
is rejected by the owner. V-561 replaces it with suspend and resume for a side query, and
keeps it for a new request (G) and a cancel.

## Reading of the set

The pattern behind Rome, V-567 and V-577 is one pattern. The claimant that knows least
about the utterance holds the earliest and strongest trigger. V-560 moved the routing
in front of one resolver. The other roles still decide before the route is read.
