diff --git a/internal/phraser/eval/address_multi_test.go b/internal/phraser/eval/address_multi_test.go
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..378f8f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/internal/phraser/eval/address_multi_test.go
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+package eval
+
+import (
+	"strings"
+	"testing"
+)
+
+// TestAddressReportsEveryBreak — the real reply from a nudge eval run broke in
+// two ways at once and the check named only the plural. Both must print: a
+// half-reported failure reads as a milder problem than it is.
+func TestAddressReportsEveryBreak(t *testing.T) {
+	body := "Смотрите на его потребление воды."
+	res := checkAddress(body)
+	if res.Pass {
+		t.Fatalf("checkAddress passed %q", body)
+	}
+	for _, want := range []string{"смотрите", "его"} {
+		if !strings.Contains(res.Detail, want) {
+			t.Errorf("detail %q does not name %q", res.Detail, want)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+// One word repeated is one problem, so the detail must not say it twice.
+func TestAddressDeduplicates(t *testing.T) {
+	res := checkAddress("Вам стоит поесть, вам это нужно.")
+	if res.Pass {
+		t.Fatal("expected failure")
+	}
+	if n := strings.Count(res.Detail, "formal"); n != 1 {
+		t.Errorf("detail repeats the same break %d times: %q", n, res.Detail)
+	}
+}
diff --git a/internal/phraser/eval/checks.go b/internal/phraser/eval/checks.go
index e88a52a..39ee366 100644
--- a/internal/phraser/eval/checks.go
+++ b/internal/phraser/eval/checks.go
@@ -434,14 +434,26 @@ func looksVerb(w string) bool {
 func checkAddress(body string) Result {
 	words := addressWordRE.FindAllString(strings.ToLower(body), -1)
 
+	// Every break, not just the first. A bad reply usually breaks in more than
+	// one way at once — "Смотрите на его потребление воды" is a plural imperative
+	// AND third person about him — and reporting only the first hid the second,
+	// which made the failure look milder than it was.
+	var breaks []string
+	seen := map[string]bool{}
+	add := func(msg string) {
+		if seen[msg] {
+			return // the same word twice in one message is one problem, not two
+		}
+		seen[msg] = true
+		breaks = append(breaks, msg)
+	}
+
 	for i, w := range words {
 		if formalPronouns[w] {
-			return Result{CheckAddress, false,
-				fmt.Sprintf("formal %q — she says ты/тебя/тебе", w)}
+			add(fmt.Sprintf("formal %q — she says ты/тебя/тебе", w))
 		}
 		if pluralVerb(w) && !(i > 0 && prepositions[words[i-1]]) {
-			return Result{CheckAddress, false,
-				fmt.Sprintf("plural imperative %q — she uses the singular", w)}
+			add(fmt.Sprintf("plural imperative %q — she uses the singular", w))
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -455,18 +467,26 @@ func checkAddress(body string) Result {
 			if !unicode.Is(unicode.Cyrillic, []rune(p)[0]) && !isLatinWord(p) {
 				continue // punctuation
 			}
-			if notAnAntecedent[p] || prepositions[p] || thirdPersonHim[p] || looksVerb(p) {
+			// pluralVerb as well as looksVerb: looksVerb knows the imperative in
+			// -й/-йте but not the -те plural ("смотрите"), so "Смотрите на его
+			// потребление воды" counted "смотрите" as the person being talked
+			// about and the "его" never printed. Third time a verb form has
+			// blinded this check — if a fourth turns up, the antecedent test
+			// wants a real morphology table, not another suffix.
+			if notAnAntecedent[p] || prepositions[p] || thirdPersonHim[p] || looksVerb(p) || pluralVerb(p) {
 				continue
 			}
 			named = true
 			break
 		}
 		if !named {
-			return Result{CheckAddress, false,
-				fmt.Sprintf("third person %q with nobody else named — she talks to him, not about him", w)}
+			add(fmt.Sprintf("third person %q with nobody else named — she talks to him, not about him", w))
 		}
 	}
 
+	if len(breaks) > 0 {
+		return Result{CheckAddress, false, strings.Join(breaks, " + ")}
+	}
 	return Result{CheckAddress, true, ""}
 }