mavend: a clarify asks differently the second time (V-457)
Every clarify turn said one sentence per gap, and a re-ask repeated it word for word. A question he already failed to answer is the worst one to ask again unchanged: the second wording is what tells him which part she missed. clarifytemplates.go holds three wordings per slot, picked by attempt rather than at random — short first, then naming the gap, then spelling it out with an example. Past the end she keeps the most explicit one instead of wrapping back to the short question he has already not answered. The intents with nothing identifiable to ask about (note, query, chat, system) kept the stub's single "не совсем поняла — можешь переформулировать?", which is the line he hears whenever she misses him completely. Four wordings now, picked by a hash of the utterance so one question asked twice reads the same and two different misses do not. Still no model call on this path: the resident model would wander, and this text has to be right every time. No schema_version either, unlike the nudge templates — these are Go constants, so no file can drift out of step with the code that reads it. The persona test already in clarify_test.go covers the new lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -156,8 +156,14 @@ func TestClarifyAsksThreeTimesThenSaysSo(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if !handled {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("answer %d must be consumed as an answer", i)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if reply != "Когда?" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("attempt %d should ask again, got %q", i, reply)
|
||||
// The wording changes with the attempt (Vikunja #457): repeating a
|
||||
// question he already failed to answer is the worst way to ask it.
|
||||
want, _ := clarifyQuestionFor(dialogue.SlotTime, i)
|
||||
if reply != want {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("attempt %d should ask again as %q, got %q", i, want, reply)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if first, _ := clarifyQuestionFor(dialogue.SlotTime, 1); reply == first {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("attempt %d repeated the first wording: %q", i, reply)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now()) == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("attempt %d must leave the question armed", i)
|
||||
@@ -349,8 +355,11 @@ func TestClarifyAsksAboutTheSecondGapToo(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if !handled {
|
||||
t.Fatal("the answer must be consumed as an answer")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if reply != "Когда?" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("a filled subject with no time must ask about the time, got %q", reply)
|
||||
// Second gap, second attempt, so it is the second wording of the time
|
||||
// question — the attempt budget is shared between the two paths.
|
||||
want, _ := clarifyQuestionFor(dialogue.SlotTime, 2)
|
||||
if reply != want {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("a filled subject with no time must ask about the time as %q, got %q", want, reply)
|
||||
}
|
||||
q := h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now())
|
||||
if q == nil {
|
||||
@@ -411,8 +420,9 @@ func TestClarifyProseHoldsThePersona(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
eval.CheckCringe: true,
|
||||
}
|
||||
lines := append([]string{clarifyGaveUp}, clarifyExpiredVariants...)
|
||||
for _, q := range clarifyQuestions {
|
||||
lines = append(lines, q)
|
||||
lines = append(lines, clarifyMissedVariants...)
|
||||
for _, variants := range clarifyQuestionVariants {
|
||||
lines = append(lines, variants...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, line := range lines {
|
||||
for _, r := range eval.RunChecks(eval.Case{}, line, "neutral") {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user