the suspend contract, and the row that was waiting for it (V-561)

The parseable twin of the owner's transcript goes green and loses its skip: Rome
is answered, the question survives the side query on the same attempt, and the
answer after it completes the reminder he actually asked for.

His transcript verbatim stays skipped, and V-561 was never going to unskip it.
What is left there is the parser — StubDateTimeParser reads neither "на 9" nor
"на завтра", so the third turn lands as an answer that filled nothing. The skip
reason now names V-543 and V-562 instead of this task.

Two V-560 tests asserted the drop notice and now assert the suspend: nothing
says a request was let go, the reply ends with the resumed question, and the
parked question is still there on attempt 1 with what it was about intact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

internal/dialogue/stack_test.go

@@ -116,14 +116,16 @@ func TestStackExpiryDropsTheStackAndIsReported(t *testing.T) {
 
 	s.Push("voice", parked("напомни", pendingBase))
 	s.Push("voice", parked("погода", pendingBase))
-	if !s.TakeExpired("voice", late) {
-		t.Error("TakeExpired did not report the timed-out exchange")
+	// Two died, and the count says two: the notice that reports this has a
+	// plural wording since V-561, and it is chosen off this number.
+	if n := s.TakeExpired("voice", late); n != 2 {
+		t.Errorf("TakeExpired reported %d timed-out questions, want 2", n)
 	}
 	if s.Depth("voice") != 0 {
 		t.Error("TakeExpired left entries behind")
 	}
-	if s.TakeExpired("voice", late) {
-		t.Error("TakeExpired reported twice")
+	if n := s.TakeExpired("voice", late); n != 0 {
+		t.Errorf("TakeExpired reported twice: %d", n)
 	}
 	// Pop of an expired top yields nothing rather than a dead action.
 	s.Push("voice", parked("напомни", pendingBase))