Keep the store's one connection, delete the seam it cannot survive (V-642)

`SetMaxOpenConns(1)` under WAL gives up concurrent reads, and the task
asked whether that costs anything. Measured over a fixed two-second
window, a paced writer against a read loop, three runs per cap:
reads do not queue. Four connections buy 70µs at p50 on a turn that
spends 1.19s in the resident model, and write throughput more than
halves. A 19ms worst case also cannot be the source of the 2.7s router
figure, so that line of enquiry is closed.

What the cap cannot survive is a long-lived transaction. It holds the
only connection, so a second read never completes: two seconds and
`context deadline exceeded`, against 1ms at a cap of four.

`Store.DB` handed out exactly that transaction. It had been there since
the initial commit with no production caller, and its comment described
a loop that never materialised. Its one user was a test helper reading
`delivery_attempts` by raw SQL, which `ListDeliveryAttempts` has covered
since V-390. So the cap stays and the seam goes, and the hazard is gone
by construction rather than by documentation.

`internal/store/conncap_test.go` stays as the standing measurement,
skipped under -short. The comment at the cap and the one in
`internal/ipc/server.go` that leans on it now state the invariant and
cite the numbers.

Measurement: docs/evals/2026-08-07-store-connection-cap.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

internal/delivery/durability_test.go

@@ -94,20 +94,22 @@ func openTestStore(t *testing.T) *store.Store {
 
 // attemptStatus reads one attempt row back. Returns ok=false when the row is
 // gone, which would itself be a broken promise (a dropped attempt).
+//
+// It goes through ListDeliveryAttempts rather than raw SQL. This helper used to
+// reach past the store into store.DB, which was the tell that the outbox was
+// write-only; the reader landed in V-390 and this caller was not moved over.
 func attemptStatus(t *testing.T, st *store.Store, id int64) (status string, completed bool, ok bool) {
 	t.Helper()
-	tx, err := st.DB(context.Background())
+	attempts, err := st.ListDeliveryAttempts(context.Background(), "", 200)
 	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatalf("read tx: %v", err)
+		t.Fatalf("ListDeliveryAttempts: %v", err)
 	}
-	defer func() { _ = tx.Rollback() }()
-	var completedTS *int64
-	err = tx.QueryRowContext(context.Background(),
-		`SELECT status, completed_ts FROM delivery_attempts WHERE id = ?`, id).Scan(&status, &completedTS)
-	if err != nil {
-		return "", false, false
+	for _, a := range attempts {
+		if a.ID == id {
+			return a.Status, a.HasComplete, true
+		}
 	}
-	return status, completedTS != nil, true
+	return "", false, false
 }
 
 // TestCrashBetweenBeginAndCompleteBecomesUnknown — simulate the crash window: