diff --git a/docs/evals/2026-08-08-two-weeks-after-merge.md b/docs/evals/2026-08-08-two-weeks-after-merge.md
index 578ffb4..3e0c4b9 100644
--- a/docs/evals/2026-08-08-two-weeks-after-merge.md
+++ b/docs/evals/2026-08-08-two-weeks-after-merge.md
@@ -80,12 +80,53 @@ V-655 was never going to touch this. A parked clarify is dialogue state and not
 a query source. It remains the single worst thing about talking to her. The week test, the
 fortnight test and this re-run all report it unchanged.
 
-## A gap in the harness
+## A gap in the harness, fixed and re-run the same day
 
 `ipc.ChatReply.Source` came back empty on all 140 turns, in both runs. The
-driver reads it from the redirect query string and there is nothing there. So
-the badge that says which query source claimed a turn is invisible to the
-harness, and every finding above is read off the reply text instead.
+driver read the redirect parameter `src` and `cmd/mavweb/chat.go` writes `s`.
+So every finding above is read off the reply text instead of off the badge.
 
-That is worth fixing before the next re-run. Reading the source directly would
-have shown the two homelab misses without inferring them from the wording.
+Fixed in V-662 and the 140 turns were driven a third time. Sixty-eight of them
+name a source. The rest are not query turns and never reach `queryWalk`.
+
+| source | turns |
+|---|---|
+| search | 27 |
+| memory | 13 |
+| personal | 9 |
+| weather | 5 |
+| calendar | 3 |
+| attention | 3 |
+| list | 2 |
+| feeds | 2 |
+| tasks, money, self, habits | 1 each |
+
+## What the badge shows that the wording did not
+
+The two unfixed homelab turns are now direct evidence.
+
+```text
+какая скорость у меня сейчас?        -> weather
+хватает ли места под новые бэкапы?   -> feeds
+```
+
+Both are guessing sources claiming a turn about the box, exactly as the
+destination fixture predicted.
+
+The badge also names a defect the wording hid. **Agenda questions are being
+claimed by the personal boundary and by Praxis, not by the calendar.**
+
+```text
+во сколько у меня встреча?   -> personal    не нашла у тебя такой записи
+когда у меня встреча?        -> attention   у Praxis нет источников
+что у меня в понедельник?    -> personal    не нашла у тебя такой записи
+```
+
+Calendar claimed 3 turns of the 6 that asked about the calendar. That is the
+same 3/6 the destination fixture scores and the same 3/6 every seed of the
+routing head scores. Three measurements agree. The cause is the one V-660 named. The possessive
+agenda rules claim these at stage 0 and name no destination, so the walk
+reaches `personal` and `attention` first.
+
+This is the third independent confirmation that the possessive agenda rules
+should name the calendar. That call is still the owner's.