Read and control the house through Home Assistant (#256)
A `smarthome` block points Maven at a Home Assistant instance. She reads its entity states to answer "что включено дома?", and every controllable device becomes a PROPOSED row in the existing act allowlist — cmd ["smarthome",<entity_id>,<service>], scope smarthome:<domain> — so nothing new had to be invented for the mutating half. ProposeTool/EnableTool/DisableTool, tool.Matcher and the confirm turn are untouched; one branch in Executor.Exec routes such a row to the client instead of exec, and "smarthome" is never run as a binary. This is the same trick overnight/mcp-tools used for #251, on purpose. Discovery only ever PROPOSES, and every control row is destructive=true: there is no read-only way to turn the heating off, so flipping something in his flat always costs a confirm turn and always had to be enabled by hand on /tools, behind step-up. The entity and the service come from the row he enabled, never from the utterance — Exec drops the spoken tail for a house row. A router that misheard can pick the wrong lamp; it cannot compose a target of its own. The service is checked against the domain's table on the way out too, so a hand-edited cmd column cannot reach an arbitrary Home Assistant service. set_brightness and set_temperature are deliberately absent: a spoken number the router got wrong is a wrong act on real hardware, and on/off is the whole of what a voice turn can defend. The read side is a query source ("home", before calendar and the recall passes) so "что нового дома?" is not answered from an old note. Its matcher needs a house marker plus an ask plus a device word and bails out on weather wording, because "какая температура на улице?" belongs to the weather source. Off unless configured: the block is dark without "enabled": true, and applyDefaults normalises a disabled block to nil so "off" stays in one place. deploy/mavend.json carries it disabled, with the token as ${HA_TOKEN}. NOT shipped, and not faked: MQTT / Zigbee2MQTT (plan steps 2 and 5) and the sensor-to-fact and presence-probe pipelines. There is no broker and no Home Assistant anywhere on this network — 8123 and 1883 are closed on every host in 192.168.1.0/24 — the module tree is vendored so a paho dependency cannot be added offline, and Home Assistant already fronts Zigbee2MQTT where it exists. Writing a sensor pipeline with no sensor to test it against would be a guess. Vikunja #256
This commit is contained in:
@@ -45,6 +45,17 @@
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"smarthome": {
|
||||
"provider": "homeassistant",
|
||||
"url": "http://192.168.1.50:8123",
|
||||
"token": "${HA_TOKEN}",
|
||||
"domains": ["light", "switch", "sensor"],
|
||||
"max_entities": 40,
|
||||
"timeout": "10s",
|
||||
"refresh": "15m",
|
||||
"enabled": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"nexus": { "url": "http://nexus:9740" },
|
||||
"praxis": { "url": "http://praxis:8989" },
|
||||
"hexis": { "url": "http://hexis:9741" },
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user