Write down the bound on suspension (V-654)

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-07 12:16:23 +04:00
parent 4fdecf9a25
commit ecb8ba72eb
+34 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Maven — Design
*Last verified: 2026-08-02 @ 7079a24. Living doc: correct it in place, do not append.*
*Last verified: 2026-08-07 @ beb093a. Living doc: correct it in place, do not append.*
> Folded 2026-07-30 from `SPEC.md` (north star, 2026-07-03), `maven.md`
> (consolidated decisions, 2026-06-30) and `ROADMAP.md` (execution plan,
@@ -282,6 +282,39 @@ Three reasons, in the order they settle it:
So the notice stays what it is: the in-process TTL case, where she really did
wait and really did let go.
#### A parked question may step aside three times
Decided 2026-08-07 (V-654). A side query or an aside suspends the parked
question instead of dropping it. The words are answered as themselves, and the
question comes back on the end of the same reply.
Neither bound on a question reaches that path. No attempt is spent, because a
side query is not a failed answer, so `MaxAttempts` never applies.
`noteSuspended` also restarts the 90s clock, since she is about to speak the
question again. So the TTL cannot arrive while he keeps talking.
Measured on 2026-08-07: one unfilled time slot rode the tail of six consecutive
unrelated replies. It stopped only when a seventh turn happened to read as a
failed answer. See `docs/evals/2026-08-07-week-of-usage.md`.
`PendingQuestion.Suspends` counts the step-asides. `MaxSuspends` is 3, matching
`DefaultMaxAttempts`. Past it she lets the request go, with the same
`clarifyDropped` line every other drop uses. The owner's rule is unchanged. A
question still ends by being answered or by being let go out loud. This only
recognises three unrelated requests in a row as the second of those.
The count is of CONSECUTIVE step-asides. It resets the moment he answers, in
`resolveClarifyAnswer`. An answer that gives her nothing she asked for resets it
too. "Позвонить маме" against a question about the time is still him in the
exchange. The retry it costs is bound enough on its own.
The re-ask is also two sentences rather than one. It used to be spliced onto the
answer with a comma. On a real answer that buries the question in the tail of
one run-on thought:
> вот что я нашла: вайфай пароль лежит в ящике стола, на какое время поставить
> напоминание?
### save-where — the two-memory routing axis
One discriminator: **does the loop evaluate a predicate against it?**