Turn a mail into task candidates, and into nothing else (#246)

The extraction half. internal/email.Extractor asks the resident Qwen3-1.7B,
under a GBNF grammar, what one message requires of him, and returns at most
three short candidates with an optional date.

Everything it can produce is a row in `tasks` with status "candidate",
written through the intake seam #130 built for exactly this (Source
"email:<mailbox>", Evidence = the subject line). No reminder, no fact, no
note, no calendar event. That bound is the design: a reminder FIRES, so a
1.7B misreading "встреча была в четверг" as a future appointment would wake
him up about it, whereas a wrong candidate is a line he dismisses in one
click. A due date the model read out of the mail is stored on the candidate,
where no scheduler reads it — the review page sorts by it. Relative wording
("до пятницы") is deliberately left in the text rather than resolved to a
date the model would get wrong.

The prompt is written against the two things a small model does here: it
summarises when asked to extract, and it invents an obligation out of a
polite closing line. Hence the demand for a verb phrase, and an explicit
empty array — most mail contains no task, and a model with no way to say
"nothing" says something.

Wiring: core owns extraction because llama-server lives in core's process,
so the reader hands messages over a new ipc.MethodIngestMail. It is a Server
hook (like StepUp/UnlockFn), not a CoreAPI method — not a store operation,
and no CoreAPI implementation should have to carry it. The hook stays nil
without an `email` config block or without a llama-server phraser, so the
method answers ErrUnknownMethod: off unless configured, twice over. There is
no keyword fallback on purpose — "the subject became a task" is a mailbox
rendered as a to-do list, not extraction.

Privacy: junk is refused before the model is called, mail text is never
search input, extraction errors carry byte counts rather than the reply, the
stored evidence is a truncated subject, and the log line names the mailbox
and the UID only.
This commit is contained in:
kami
2026-08-01 03:06:55 +04:00
parent b4646155b4
commit f42d1594ef
12 changed files with 871 additions and 5 deletions
+6 -1
View File
@@ -74,7 +74,12 @@ func Requirement(m ipc.Method) Authority {
// existing analogue.
ipc.MethodCaptureTask,
ipc.MethodListTasks,
ipc.MethodSetTaskStatus:
ipc.MethodSetTaskStatus,
// Mail ingestion (Vikunja #246). AuthRead because of what the method can
// produce: candidate tasks and nothing else. It cannot write a fact, set a
// reminder, or touch the tool allowlist, so a compromised mail reader can
// at worst put junk on a review page he clears in one click.
ipc.MethodIngestMail:
return AuthRead
}
// Unknown method ⇒ AuthRead, but ipc.dispatch returns ErrUnknownMethod
+32
View File
@@ -150,6 +150,12 @@ type Config struct {
// absent ⇒ no evaluation loop at all. See MemoryEvalConfig.
MemoryEval *MemoryEvalConfig `json:"memory_eval,omitempty"`
// Email — mail ingestion (Vikunja #246). nil / absent ⇒ core refuses
// ipc.MethodIngestMail outright, so a mail reader cannot make Maven read a
// mailbox by merely existing. See EmailConfig; the IMAP host and credential
// live in the reader (cmd/mavmaild), never here.
Email *EmailConfig `json:"email,omitempty"`
// Praxis — the ecosystem attention-state service. When configured, maven
// calls the Praxis HTTP tools API for attention listing and item lifecycle.
// Maven never touches Praxis's database directly (ecosystem invariant: no
@@ -418,6 +424,26 @@ type MemoryEvalConfig struct {
MinConfidence float64 `json:"min_confidence,omitempty"`
}
// EmailConfig — core's half of the email reader: how many task candidates one
// message may produce, and how long the extraction call may take.
//
// There is deliberately nothing about a mailbox here. Core does not connect to
// IMAP, does not know an account exists, and holds no mail credential — the
// reader daemon does, the same split mavpoll uses for the zenmoney token. This
// block only says "extraction is allowed, with these bounds".
type EmailConfig struct {
// MaxTasks — candidates per message. 0 ⇒ email.MaxCandidates (3).
MaxTasks int `json:"max_tasks,omitempty"`
// Timeout — per-message extraction budget. 0 ⇒ DefaultEmailTimeout. This is
// a Thinking model reading a mail; nobody is waiting on the answer, but a
// hung llama-server must not pin the reader's connection forever.
Timeout Duration `json:"timeout,omitempty"`
}
// DefaultEmailTimeout — extraction budget per message.
const DefaultEmailTimeout = 2 * time.Minute
// PhraserConfig — the LLM-backed phraser seam. The daemon spawns llama-server
// as a managed subprocess and sends chat-completion requests to phrase nudge
// and reminder messages. nil ⇒ the template-based Stub is used instead.
@@ -607,6 +633,12 @@ func (c *Config) applyDefaults() {
c.MemoryEval.Interval = Duration(DefaultMemoryEvalInterval)
}
// Same rule again: absent stays nil (⇒ mail ingestion refused), present gets
// the timeout default so `{}` is a valid "on with the defaults".
if c.Email != nil && c.Email.Timeout <= 0 {
c.Email.Timeout = Duration(DefaultEmailTimeout)
}
if c.Voice != nil {
if c.Voice.RouterThreshold <= 0 {
c.Voice.RouterThreshold = DefaultRouterThreshold
+226
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
package email
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"strings"
"time"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/persona"
)
// Extraction — turning one mail into task CANDIDATES, and nothing else.
//
// The output of this file can only ever become rows in `tasks` with status
// "candidate" (store.TaskCandidate), written through the one intake seam
// (ipc.CaptureTaskReq, Vikunja #130). That bound is the whole design:
//
// - No reminder. A reminder FIRES; it speaks to him unprompted. A 1.7B that
// misreads "встреча была в четверг" as a future appointment would then wake
// him up about it. A candidate that is wrong is a line on a review page he
// dismisses in one click, which is the correct cost of a model being wrong
// about someone's mail.
// - No fact. A fact is a claim Maven will later recite as true. Nothing read
// out of a marketing mail deserves that standing.
// - No calendar event, no note, no action. Extraction writes candidates or
// writes nothing.
//
// The due date the model may return is stored on the candidate (tasks.due_ts),
// which no scheduler reads — it is there so the review page can sort by it.
//
// Privacy: the mail text goes to the resident model on this box and nowhere
// else. It is never search input (CLAUDE.md: "his notes and facts are never
// search input" — mail is the same class), and Evidence keeps only the subject
// line, so the review page shows him where a candidate came from without the
// store growing a copy of his mailbox.
// MaxCandidates — at most this many candidates per message, enforced by the
// grammar. A mail with four tasks in it is a mail he has to read himself; a
// model allowed ten will produce ten.
const MaxCandidates = 3
// SourcePrefix — provenance for everything this package captures. The mailbox
// name is appended: "email:INBOX". Same vocabulary as tap:voice / poll:netdata.
const SourcePrefix = "email:"
// Candidate — one piece of work the model thinks the mail is asking for.
type Candidate struct {
Text string `json:"text"`
// Due — "YYYY-MM-DD" or empty. A date the model read out of the text, not a
// date it computed: relative wording ("до пятницы") is left in Text, because
// a small model resolving "пятница" against today's date gets it wrong often
// enough that a stored wrong date is worse than no date.
Due string `json:"due"`
}
// Completer — the llama-server seam, same shape memeval and the router use, so
// the one resident model serves this caller too.
type Completer interface {
Complete(ctx context.Context, r llm.Req) (string, error)
}
// Extractor reads a message and returns candidates. It holds no store and no
// writer on purpose: this type cannot persist anything, so "extraction never
// acts" is a property of the code, not of a review.
type Extractor struct {
llm Completer
// MaxCandidates — 0 ⇒ MaxCandidates.
max int
// ContextBlock — the shared persona block, optional. Extraction output is
// not spoken, so the persona matters less here than in the phraser; it is
// wired anyway so a candidate reads in her voice on the review page.
contextBlock func() string
}
func NewExtractor(c Completer, max int, contextBlock func() string) *Extractor {
if max <= 0 || max > MaxCandidates {
max = MaxCandidates
}
return &Extractor{llm: c, max: max, contextBlock: contextBlock}
}
// extractGrammar — GBNF pinning the answer to a bounded array of fixed-shape
// candidates. Same reasoning as memeval's evalGrammar and the router's
// routeGrammar: the shape and the length bound are what keep a small model from
// drifting into prose or spending the token budget repeating one field.
//
// The empty array is reachable, deliberately: most mail contains no task, and a
// model with no way to say "nothing" invents something.
const extractGrammar = `
root ::= "[" ws (item ("," ws item){0,2})? ws "]"
item ::= "{" ws "\"text\"" ws ":" ws text "," ws "\"due\"" ws ":" ws due ws "}"
text ::= "\"" ([^"\\] | "\\" .){1,120} "\""
due ::= "\"\"" | "\"" [0-9]{4} "-" [0-9]{2} "-" [0-9]{2} "\""
ws ::= [ \t\n]*
`
// extractSystem — the extraction prompt.
//
// Written around the two failure modes a small model has on this task: it
// summarises when asked to extract (turning a mail into "письмо от Антона"),
// and it invents an obligation from any polite closing sentence. Hence the
// insistence on a verb phrase, and the explicit permission to return [].
const extractSystem = `Ты читаешь одно письмо из его почты и достаёшь из него дела, которые письмо от него требует.
Правила:
- Отвечай ТОЛЬКО массивом JSON. Каждый элемент: {"text": "...", "due": "ГГГГ-ММ-ДД" или ""}.
- text — короткая формулировка дела по-русски, с глаголом: "оплатить счёт за интернет", "отправить акт". Не пересказывай письмо и не описывай его.
- Дело — это то, что должен сделать ОН. Рассылка, реклама, уведомление, отчёт, письмо «просто к сведению» — дел не содержат.
- Если письмо ничего от него не требует, верни пустой массив []. Это нормальный ответ, так бывает чаще всего.
- Ничего не придумывай. Если срока в письме нет — "".
- due заполняй только когда в письме стоит конкретная дата. Слова вроде «до пятницы» оставь в text, дату не вычисляй.
- Максимум три дела. Лучше одно точное, чем три общих.`
// Extract returns the candidates in one message.
//
// Junk is refused without an LLM call — cheapest possible defence, and the
// reason the header filter exists. An empty message (no subject, no body) is
// likewise not worth a round trip.
//
// A parse failure is an error the caller logs and moves past. It is never
// silently turned into zero candidates, because "the model went off the rails"
// and "the mail contains no task" want different reactions from a human reading
// the log.
func (e *Extractor) Extract(ctx context.Context, msg Message) ([]Candidate, error) {
if msg.Junk {
return nil, nil
}
user := renderForModel(msg)
if user == "" {
return nil, nil
}
raw, err := e.llm.Complete(ctx, llm.Req{
System: persona.Prepend(e.contextBlock, extractSystem),
User: user,
Grammar: extractGrammar,
MaxTokens: 512,
RepeatPenalty: 1.1,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("email: extract: %w", err)
}
items, err := parseCandidates(raw)
if err != nil {
// The raw reply is NOT in the error: it is a transformation of his mail,
// and this error reaches the daemon log.
return nil, fmt.Errorf("email: extract: unparsable reply (%d bytes)", len(raw))
}
out := make([]Candidate, 0, len(items))
seen := map[string]bool{}
for _, it := range items {
it.Text = strings.TrimSpace(it.Text)
if it.Text == "" {
continue
}
key := strings.ToLower(strings.Join(strings.Fields(it.Text), " "))
if seen[key] {
continue // the model repeating itself is not two tasks
}
seen[key] = true
if _, ok := ParseDue(it.Due); !ok {
it.Due = "" // a date the grammar allowed but the calendar does not
}
out = append(out, it)
if len(out) >= e.max {
break
}
}
return out, nil
}
// renderForModel is the user turn: subject, sender and body, labelled. Only
// these three fields — no headers, no recipient list, no message-id, nothing
// that would let the model start reasoning about routing metadata.
func renderForModel(msg Message) string {
var b strings.Builder
if msg.From != "" {
fmt.Fprintf(&b, "От: %s\n", msg.From)
}
if msg.Subject != "" {
fmt.Fprintf(&b, "Тема: %s\n", msg.Subject)
}
if msg.Body != "" {
fmt.Fprintf(&b, "\n%s\n", msg.Body)
}
if msg.Subject == "" && msg.Body == "" {
return ""
}
return b.String()
}
// parseCandidates decodes the grammar-constrained reply, tolerating the
// wrappers a Thinking model sometimes leaves around it (a fenced block, or
// leading reasoning before the array).
func parseCandidates(raw string) ([]Candidate, error) {
s := strings.TrimSpace(raw)
if i := strings.Index(s, "["); i > 0 {
s = s[i:]
}
if j := strings.LastIndex(s, "]"); j >= 0 {
s = s[:j+1]
}
var out []Candidate
if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(s), &out); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return out, nil
}
// ParseDue turns the model's "YYYY-MM-DD" into a time in UTC. Exported because
// the daemon-side intake stores it on the candidate.
//
// The zero-value/empty case returns ok=false rather than an error: no date is
// the common answer, not a failure.
func ParseDue(s string) (time.Time, bool) {
s = strings.TrimSpace(s)
if s == "" {
return time.Time{}, false
}
t, err := time.Parse("2006-01-02", s)
if err != nil {
return time.Time{}, false
}
return t, true
}
+143
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
package email
import (
"context"
"strings"
"testing"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
)
// fakeLLM returns a canned reply and records the request, so a test can assert
// on the grammar and on what of the mail was sent.
type fakeLLM struct {
reply string
err error
got llm.Req
calls int
}
func (f *fakeLLM) Complete(_ context.Context, r llm.Req) (string, error) {
f.calls++
f.got = r
return f.reply, f.err
}
func msgFor(subject, body string) Message {
return Message{UID: 1, From: "anton@example.org", Subject: subject, Body: body}
}
func TestExtractCandidates(t *testing.T) {
f := &fakeLLM{reply: `[{"text":"отправить акт","due":""},{"text":"оплатить счёт","due":"2026-08-05"}]`}
e := NewExtractor(f, 0, nil)
got, err := e.Extract(context.Background(), msgFor("Акт и счёт", "Надо отправить акт и оплатить счёт до 5 августа."))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("extract: %v", err)
}
if len(got) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("got %d candidates, want 2: %+v", len(got), got)
}
if got[0].Text != "отправить акт" || got[1].Due != "2026-08-05" {
t.Errorf("candidates = %+v", got)
}
if f.got.Grammar == "" {
t.Error("extraction must be grammar-constrained")
}
// The subject and body go to the model; nothing else about the message does.
if !strings.Contains(f.got.User, "Акт и счёт") || !strings.Contains(f.got.User, "оплатить счёт") {
t.Errorf("user turn = %q", f.got.User)
}
}
func TestExtractEmptyArrayIsNotAnError(t *testing.T) {
f := &fakeLLM{reply: "[]"}
got, err := NewExtractor(f, 0, nil).Extract(context.Background(), msgFor("FYI", "Просто к сведению."))
if err != nil || len(got) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("got (%v, %v), want (empty, nil) — no task is the normal answer", got, err)
}
}
// Junk must never reach the model: the header filter exists so the resident
// model is not spent on newsletters.
func TestExtractSkipsJunkWithoutCallingModel(t *testing.T) {
f := &fakeLLM{reply: `[{"text":"купить всё со скидкой","due":""}]`}
msg := msgFor("Скидки", "Sale!")
msg.Junk = true
got, err := NewExtractor(f, 0, nil).Extract(context.Background(), msg)
if err != nil || got != nil {
t.Fatalf("got (%v, %v), want (nil, nil)", got, err)
}
if f.calls != 0 {
t.Errorf("model called %d times for junk, want 0", f.calls)
}
}
func TestExtractEmptyMessageIsNotSent(t *testing.T) {
f := &fakeLLM{reply: "[]"}
if _, err := NewExtractor(f, 0, nil).Extract(context.Background(), Message{UID: 3}); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("extract: %v", err)
}
if f.calls != 0 {
t.Errorf("model called %d times for an empty message, want 0", f.calls)
}
}
func TestExtractCaps(t *testing.T) {
f := &fakeLLM{reply: `[{"text":"a","due":""},{"text":"b","due":""},{"text":"c","due":""}]`}
got, err := NewExtractor(f, 2, nil).Extract(context.Background(), msgFor("s", "b"))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("extract: %v", err)
}
if len(got) != 2 {
t.Errorf("got %d, want the configured cap of 2", len(got))
}
}
func TestExtractDropsRepeatsAndBadDates(t *testing.T) {
f := &fakeLLM{reply: `[{"text":"Отправить акт","due":"2026-02-31"},{"text":"отправить акт","due":""},{"text":" ","due":""}]`}
got, err := NewExtractor(f, 0, nil).Extract(context.Background(), msgFor("s", "b"))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("extract: %v", err)
}
if len(got) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("got %d candidates, want 1 (repeat and blank dropped): %+v", len(got), got)
}
if got[0].Due != "" {
t.Errorf("due = %q, want empty — 2026-02-31 is not a date", got[0].Due)
}
}
// A Thinking model sometimes wraps the array; and when it emits something
// unparsable the caller must hear about it rather than see "no tasks".
func TestParseCandidatesTolerance(t *testing.T) {
got, err := parseCandidates("думаю... [{\"text\":\"x\",\"due\":\"\"}] всё")
if err != nil || len(got) != 1 || got[0].Text != "x" {
t.Fatalf("got (%+v, %v)", got, err)
}
if _, err := parseCandidates("нет никакого JSON"); err == nil {
t.Error("unparsable output must be an error")
}
}
func TestExtractParseErrorHidesMailText(t *testing.T) {
f := &fakeLLM{reply: "он просил отправить акт, вот такой ответ"}
_, err := NewExtractor(f, 0, nil).Extract(context.Background(), msgFor("Акт", "секретный текст"))
if err == nil {
t.Fatal("want an error")
}
if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "акт") || strings.Contains(err.Error(), "секретный") {
t.Errorf("error text leaks mail content: %v", err)
}
}
func TestParseDue(t *testing.T) {
if _, ok := ParseDue(""); ok {
t.Error("empty due must be (zero, false)")
}
if got, ok := ParseDue("2026-08-05"); !ok || got.Year() != 2026 || got.Month() != 8 || got.Day() != 5 {
t.Errorf("ParseDue = (%v, %v)", got, ok)
}
if _, ok := ParseDue("05.08.2026"); ok {
t.Error("a non-ISO date must not parse")
}
}
+38
View File
@@ -138,6 +138,44 @@ type CaptureTaskResp struct {
Created bool `json:"created"`
}
// IngestMailReq — one message a mail reader has fetched, handed to core for
// extraction (Vikunja #246).
//
// The mail reader (cmd/mavmaild) holds the IMAP credential and core never sees
// it, the same split mavpoll uses for the zenmoney token. What crosses this
// boundary is only the message text, because extraction runs on the resident
// model and llama-server lives inside core's process.
//
// Body is already plaintext and truncated by internal/email; core does not
// re-parse MIME and never stores the body. Junk means the reader's header
// filter already classified the message as bulk — core is told rather than
// asked, so a junk message can be counted without a model call.
//
// This method is available only when core has an email block configured AND a
// llama-server phraser; otherwise it answers ErrUnknownMethod, which is what
// "off unless configured" looks like at the wire.
type IngestMailReq struct {
Mailbox string `json:"mailbox"`
UID uint32 `json:"uid"`
From string `json:"from,omitempty"`
Subject string `json:"subject,omitempty"`
Date string `json:"date,omitempty"`
Body string `json:"body,omitempty"`
Junk bool `json:"junk,omitempty"`
}
// IngestMailResp — what core did with the message. TaskIDs are the rows
// CaptureTask returned; Created counts the ones that were new (a re-read
// mailbox dedupes to Created=0). Skipped is set when nothing was asked of the
// model at all — junk, or an empty message.
//
// Nothing here echoes the mail back. The reader logs counts.
type IngestMailResp struct {
TaskIDs []int64 `json:"task_ids,omitempty"`
Created int `json:"created"`
Skipped bool `json:"skipped,omitempty"`
}
type listTasksReq struct {
Status string `json:"status"` // "" all | "live" | candidate|open|done|dropped
}
+11
View File
@@ -448,6 +448,17 @@ func (c *Client) SetTaskStatus(ctx context.Context, id int64, status string, ts
return c.call(ctx, MethodSetTaskStatus, setTaskStatusReq{ID: id, Status: status, Ts: ts}, nil)
}
// IngestMail hands one fetched message to core for extraction. ErrUnknownMethod
// means core has no email block configured — the caller should stop asking, not
// retry.
func (c *Client) IngestMail(ctx context.Context, req IngestMailReq) (IngestMailResp, error) {
var r IngestMailResp
if err := c.call(ctx, MethodIngestMail, req, &r); err != nil {
return IngestMailResp{}, err
}
return r, nil
}
func (c *Client) DismissProposedRoutine(ctx context.Context, id int64) error {
return c.call(ctx, MethodDismissProposedRoutine, dismissProposedRoutineReq{ID: id}, nil)
}
+33
View File
@@ -565,3 +565,36 @@ func mustJSON(v any) []byte {
}
return b
}
// TestIngestMail_OffUnlessConfigured — with no IngestMailFn set (the default,
// and what an unconfigured core looks like) the method does not exist. A mail
// reader gets a refusal it can act on rather than a silent success.
func TestIngestMail_OffUnlessConfigured(t *testing.T) {
_, _, cli, _ := newServerWithStore(t)
if _, err := cli.IngestMail(context.Background(), IngestMailReq{Mailbox: "INBOX", UID: 1}); !errors.Is(err, ErrUnknownMethod) {
t.Fatalf("IngestMail error = %v, want ErrUnknownMethod", err)
}
}
// TestIngestMail_Hook — when the daemon wires the hook, the message crosses the
// boundary intact and the response comes back.
func TestIngestMail_Hook(t *testing.T) {
_, srv, cli, _ := newServerWithStore(t)
var got IngestMailReq
srv.IngestMailFn = func(_ context.Context, req IngestMailReq) (IngestMailResp, error) {
got = req
return IngestMailResp{TaskIDs: []int64{7}, Created: 1}, nil
}
resp, err := cli.IngestMail(context.Background(), IngestMailReq{
Mailbox: "INBOX", UID: 12, Subject: "Счёт", Body: "Оплатить.", Junk: false,
})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("IngestMail: %v", err)
}
if resp.Created != 1 || len(resp.TaskIDs) != 1 || resp.TaskIDs[0] != 7 {
t.Errorf("resp = %+v", resp)
}
if got.UID != 12 || got.Subject != "Счёт" || got.Body != "Оплатить." {
t.Errorf("req across the wire = %+v", got)
}
}
+33 -4
View File
@@ -421,6 +421,17 @@ type Server struct {
// Set by the daemon; nil ⇒ MethodStoreEncryptionKey returns ErrUnknownMethod.
WrapKeyFn WrapKeyFunc
// IngestMailFn — extracts task candidates from one fetched message. Set by
// the daemon only when an email block is configured AND there is a
// llama-server to extract with; nil ⇒ MethodIngestMail returns
// ErrUnknownMethod, so a mail reader pointed at a core that is not
// configured for mail is refused rather than silently ignored.
//
// Like StepUp/WrapKeyFn/UnlockFn this bypasses CoreAPI: it is not a store
// operation, it needs the resident model, and it must not become a method
// every CoreAPI implementation has to carry.
IngestMailFn IngestMailFunc
// UnlockFn — unwraps the store encryption key from the wrapped blob using
// the passkey credential public key, opens the encrypted store, and wires
// the rest of the daemon (voice, loop, delivery). Set by the daemon when
@@ -439,6 +450,9 @@ type WrapKeyFunc func(ctx context.Context, publicKey []byte) error
// public key and completes daemon initialization.
type UnlockFunc func(ctx context.Context, publicKey []byte) error
// IngestMailFunc — core-side mail extraction. Returns what was captured.
type IngestMailFunc func(ctx context.Context, req IngestMailReq) (IngestMailResp, error)
// CheckFunc — the auth hook signature. Wired by the daemon (auth.Gate.Check
// satisfies this); dispatch calls it once per request after param-unmarshal
// independence (it gets the raw params, may unmarshal what it needs — ipc
@@ -606,9 +620,10 @@ func withoutParams[R any](fn func(ctx context.Context, api CoreAPI) (R, error))
// existed) as an argument — so SetAPI's runtime swap (the unlock transition)
// is still honored on the very next request with no extra plumbing here.
//
// MethodAssertStepUp, MethodStoreEncryptionKey and MethodUnlock are NOT in
// this table: they bypass CoreAPI entirely (s.StepUp / s.WrapKeyFn /
// s.UnlockFn), so dispatch special-cases them before consulting the table.
// MethodAssertStepUp, MethodStoreEncryptionKey, MethodUnlock and
// MethodIngestMail are NOT in this table: they bypass CoreAPI entirely
// (s.StepUp / s.WrapKeyFn / s.UnlockFn / s.IngestMailFn), so dispatch
// special-cases them before consulting the table.
var methodTable = map[Method]handlerFunc{
MethodWriteFact: withParams(func(ctx context.Context, api CoreAPI, p WriteFactReq) (idResp, error) {
id, err := api.WriteFact(ctx, p)
@@ -816,7 +831,7 @@ func (s *Server) dispatch(ctx context.Context, req Request) (json.RawMessage, er
}
}
// These three bypass CoreAPI entirely — they drive Server fields set
// These bypass CoreAPI entirely — they drive Server fields set
// directly by the daemon (StepUp / WrapKeyFn / UnlockFn), not store
// state, so they can never be table entries keyed on a CoreAPI method.
switch req.Method {
@@ -845,6 +860,20 @@ func (s *Server) dispatch(ctx context.Context, req Request) (json.RawMessage, er
return marshalResult(nil), s.UnlockFn(ctx, p.PublicKey)
}
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrUnknownMethod, req.Method)
case MethodIngestMail:
if s.IngestMailFn != nil {
var p IngestMailReq
if err := unmarshalParams(req.Params, &p); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
resp, err := s.IngestMailFn(ctx, p)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return marshalResult(resp), nil
}
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrUnknownMethod, req.Method)
}
h, ok := methodTable[req.Method]
+1
View File
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ const (
MethodCaptureTask Method = "capture_task"
MethodListTasks Method = "list_tasks"
MethodSetTaskStatus Method = "set_task_status"
MethodIngestMail Method = "ingest_mail"
)
// Request — one frame from module to core. Params is the JSON-encoded argument