Stalls compared the due instant to now while Rank compares whole calendar days, so a task due at 09:00 was counted overdue from 09:01 while its own row on the same page still read the reason as today. Stalls now reads dayDelta.
A row with no capture time also counted as sitting, because the zero time is January of year 1 and every span from it clears ten days. Rank already guarded that and Stalls did not.
Folded the open-versus-candidate partition FormatRU and Spoken each carried into one split helper. The two have to agree on where that line falls.
Step 5 of the board build. internal/tasks/stall.go counts three shapes —
overdue, sitting longer than StallDays, waiting for confirmation — and states
nothing about what any of them means. That is the line
internal/memory/behavior.go already drew for habits, and the reason is the
same: a 1.7B asked to judge will agree fluently and launder a guess into a
decision. A test asserts the wording carries no assessment.
Sitting is measured from created_ts, the only clock a live row carries: the
store stamps resolved_ts and nothing else. So "no state change in eleven days"
is exactly "captured eleven days ago and still live", which is narrower than
the plan's wording and is the claim the data supports. A candidate is never
counted as overdue, because its due date is Maven's reading of a mail rather
than a deadline he set.
Not a nag. No tick rule reads the counts; they go on /tasks and into the list
reply when he asks, and tickLoop.dayPlan still does not read tasks at all. The
empty case renders as nothing: "ничего не залежалось" appended to every list
read is a nag with a friendly face.
Three say entries, so the page and the spoken list cannot word it differently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
claude