A task is not a fact and not a note. A fact is a claim about the world that a
correction supersedes; a note is something to recall by meaning. A task is work
with a lifecycle, and the read that matters is "everything outstanding right
now" — which over an append-only log would mean replaying history on every
question. So: a tasks table, migration #14, statuses candidate/open/done/dropped
that each move forward exactly once.
Dedupe is on normalised text among LIVE rows only, via a partial unique index.
That is the property the mail side needs: an extractor may call CaptureTask for
every message it reads, as often as it likes, without growing the list — while a
weekly errand is still capturable again once the last one is done.
Three ways in, one seam. ipc.CaptureTaskReq is it: the voice path
(router.ParseTaskCapture on an explicit marker — "добавь в задачи …", never
"надо бы поспать"), the /tasks form, and the email reader from #246 when it
exists. Mail-derived items set Source "email:<account>", Status "candidate" and
Evidence to whatever makes the row reviewable; a candidate is inert until he
confirms it on /tasks, and Maven names it as unconfirmed when she recites the
list rather than putting words in his mouth.
No new intent — the router enum is a contract with the relabelling prompt, so
capture rides the note intent and the list rides a query source, both matched
deterministically like the calendar and plan matchers already are.
Nothing here speaks. No tick rule reads tasks; the list is answered when asked
about, which is why /tasks POST is not step-up gated the way /tools and
/routines are — a task write moves no boundary.
Vikunja #130
The plan answers "какие планы на сегодня?" by putting one day in order:
calendar events (with #126's ambient provenance carried through and hedged),
pending reminders, and one line per morning routine that still has items
outstanding. "что дальше?" trims what has already passed.
It lives in internal/morning, not in a parallel system, because it is the same
question the checklist asks at a different scale — the routine knows what is
missing from a window, the plan knows what the whole day holds, and both read
the same facts and the same idea of "today". BuildPlan is pure; tickLoop.dayPlan
is the impure half that reads the store.
It is not a nag. Nothing here fires, schedules or announces: the plan is built
only when asked, over IPC (day_plan) or on the existing /morning page.
Unprompted delivery stays with the morning nudge and the dispatcher's policy.
The query source sits before "calendar" in querySources because both match
"…на сегодня" and the plan's matcher is the more specific one; IsDayPlanQuery
matches whole words so "планёрка" (a meeting) is not read as a request for the
plan, and refuses any utterance naming another day, since the plan is built for
the clock's own day only.
Verified: make build and make test both exit 0; new tests cover plan ordering,
the checklist-only-what-is-left rule, other-day rejection, the RU rendering
against the persona checks, rest-of-day trimming, the source ordering, and the
matcher's refusals.
kami