Three documentation changes and one deletion.
CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md gain the Nexus/Praxis/Hexis sections that were written
last session and never committed: what each service owns, where Maven's client
for it lives, and the rules that are not negotiable.
The p50 latency figure was wrong in two files. CLAUDE.md said the cascade costs
2.7s and that the LLM router is 90x slower than the classifier. Both come from
the bakeoff table, where the number is contention on a shared llama-server, not
the model. ROUTING-EVAL-31-07-2026.md line 61 says so and measures the router at
p50 825ms / p95 1.2s / max 3.0s. Corrected in CLAUDE.md, and the bakeoff table
now carries a header pointing at the routing eval for absolute latency. Latency
work was about to be planned off a number that was never real.
HANDOFF.md is deleted. It described work sitting on fix/integrated waiting for a
fast-forward onto overnight/eco-versioned-traces. Neither is true: master
contains that tip plus 22 commits, and both branch pointers are stale. The three
live defects it recorded move to PLAN-DETERMINISM-02-08-2026.md, which is now
the only planning document.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BFaeSbLMEVG5ey8tejU3y2
CLAUDE.md's routing section said "llmrouter is wired nil" and called the
classifier cascade the committed default. That stopped being true when the
integration merge landed: voice.go:214 wires pickLLMRouter, DefaultLLMRouter is
on, and deploy/mavend.json sets llm_router true. It is the first thing anyone
reads before touching the router, so it was pointing the next reader at a
wiring job that is already done.
Rewritten to say the LLM router is the default, the classifier is the failure
floor and must not be deleted, and what the two actually measure — 36.8% at
p50 31ms against 67.5%/72.7% at p50 ~2.7s, a trade accepted on purpose. Names
the one thing still open on that path: Confidence is hardcoded 1.0 in
llmrouter.go, so the LLM never asks for clarification (#359).
Also in CLAUDE.md: the persona line pointed at a memory file that does not
exist, so the actual rule was nowhere in the repo. Written out instead —
feminine self-reference, informal singular address, pet names forbidden but his
name allowed — plus the three eval checks that enforce it.
MODEL-BAKEOFF: three claims had gone stale within hours of being written. There
IS a make eval-models target now; the routing numbers ARE the production path,
not a bench artifact waiting on a wiring change; and the truncated 293 MB gguf
is deleted. Struck through rather than removed, since the caveats are part of
how the evening read at the time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The file ran two sweeps and the second one changed the resident model, but
the lede still opened with "Recommendation: keep Qwen3.5-0.8B". Anyone
landing on the file read the wrong conclusion and had to scroll 100 lines
to find that it had been replaced — and it contradicted CLAUDE.md, which
already says the resident model is Qwen3-1.7B.
Both sweeps are accurate, so nothing is rewritten. The lede now states the
outcome and the first sweep's verdict is scoped to what it actually tested:
it rejects LFM2.5-1.2B, which still holds. It never was a case for keeping
0.8B as the resident model.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Numbers behind the resident-model change, plus the answer to "could a 230-350M
model do this instead" — no, and the reason is worth keeping: LFM2.5's published
instruction-following scores beat Qwen3.5-0.8B, and every one of those benchmarks
except Multi-IF is English. In Russian the 350M invents non-words and the 230M
answers in Spanish.
Also fills the row TALK-EVAL-31-07-2026.md had to void for contamination, and
corrects a wrong call I nearly made: the 1.7B's 16s p95 looked like the reasoning
trace, but the 0.8B sits at 17s in every run and the 1.7B beat it twice out of
three. The long tail is shared and is not the Thinking block.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
kami