Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
kami d0d0021659 mavend: let a fact close the nudge that asked for it
The snooze wire had one end. "готово" and "выпил воды" both left the nudge
pending, so the auto-tuner only ever learned from deferrals and from
silence — never from the rule working.

Two entry points, because the two utterances are different acts. A bare
"готово" carries no content and is intercepted before the router, sharing
pendingNudge and the twenty-minute window with the snooze. "выпил воды" IS
content: it routes normally, writes its fact, and only then closes the
nudge (ackFromFact, after applyAction). Folding the second into a pre-route
intercept would have thrown away the thing he actually said.

ackFromFact is silent. The fact reply stands; "отлично, отметила" on top
would be her congratulating him for obeying, which is the nag she is not.

Which fact answers which rule comes from the rule's own InertWhenNoData, so
a rule added later is covered the day it lands. "да" and "ок" stay out of
the ack vocabulary: the clarify gate upstream has the stronger claim on
them, and a stray "да" must not rewrite the feedback signal.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
2026-08-01 21:43:28 +04:00
kami 79c3b994cf mavend: let him say "потом" to a nudge
A nudge could only be deferred from Telegram or the web UI. The voice path
had no route to store.ResolveNudge at all, so the channel she nudges on
hardest was the one he could not answer out loud.

resolveSnooze runs pre-route, right after the quiet toggle, and writes the
same `snoozed` outcome the buttons write — which also drops the row out of
RepeatUnacked, so a deferred sev4 stops re-sending every five minutes.

The window is what makes this safe to run before the router. "потом" is an
ordinary word; it only counts as a deferral when a pending nudge was sent
in the last twenty minutes, and otherwise the turn routes normally. Single
word patterns still match single-word utterances only, so "потом схожу за
водой" reports a plan instead of silencing the rule that prompted it.

Channel is not filtered: a nudge that went to Telegram is still what he is
answering when he says "потом" at the microphone.

QA-PLAN gains the two new manual checks and drops the 319 warning.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
2026-08-01 21:40:06 +04:00
kami f1a809121b shutdown: close the sockets, or the database never gets sealed
mavend seals its encrypted database in `defer st.Close()` when run() returns.
It had not returned since 2026-07-21. Every restart since then decrypted the
same eleven-day-old ciphertext and rolled back everything written in between:
the Telegram nudge that kept firing was a fact being un-written on each boot.

The goroutine dump named it. main → srv.Close() → ipc.(*Server).Close →
wg.Wait(), waiting on per-connection goroutines parked in readFrame. Close
shut the listener and nothing else, so the idle persistent sockets held by
mavweb, mavpoll, mavcaldav and mavmaild blocked shutdown forever. `docker
compose stop -t 60` spent the whole sixty seconds and then took a SIGKILL.

So: track the accepted conns and close them, in ipc and in voice, which had
the identical defect. Bound all three waits — the two per-server ones and the
worker wait in main — because the seal matters more than any single in-flight
call. A dropped RPC costs one reply; a missed seal costs a session.

The regression test leaves a client connected and idle, which is the case the
old tests avoided by closing the client first.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
2026-08-01 20:05:52 +04:00