Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
claude 85456d3833 tasks: count overdue by calendar day like the ranker does (V-581)
Stalls compared the due instant to now while Rank compares whole calendar days, so a task due at 09:00 was counted overdue from 09:01 while its own row on the same page still read the reason as today. Stalls now reads dayDelta.

A row with no capture time also counted as sitting, because the zero time is January of year 1 and every span from it clears ten days. Rank already guarded that and Stalls did not.

Folded the open-versus-candidate partition FormatRU and Spoken each carried into one split helper. The two have to agree on where that line falls.
2026-08-06 03:12:28 +04:00
claude be62660be9 /tasks counts stall shapes, and assesses none of them (V-512)
Step 5 of the board build. internal/tasks/stall.go counts three shapes —
overdue, sitting longer than StallDays, waiting for confirmation — and states
nothing about what any of them means. That is the line
internal/memory/behavior.go already drew for habits, and the reason is the
same: a 1.7B asked to judge will agree fluently and launder a guess into a
decision. A test asserts the wording carries no assessment.

Sitting is measured from created_ts, the only clock a live row carries: the
store stamps resolved_ts and nothing else. So "no state change in eleven days"
is exactly "captured eleven days ago and still live", which is narrower than
the plan's wording and is the claim the data supports. A candidate is never
counted as overdue, because its due date is Maven's reading of a mail rather
than a deadline he set.

Not a nag. No tick rule reads the counts; they go on /tasks and into the list
reply when he asks, and tickLoop.dayPlan still does not read tasks at all. The
empty case renders as nothing: "ничего не залежалось" appended to every list
read is a nag with a friendly face.

Three say entries, so the page and the spoken list cannot word it differently.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
2026-08-05 19:54:21 +04:00
claude fe489dff6d Merge task/467 so the sweep tail can reach the three mechanisms (V-528)
attentionq.go, repair.go and internal/router/complaint.go carry the last
hand-written Russian patterns of the V-522 sweep, and they live on task/467.
internal/lexicon, internal/morph and cmd/mavend/topics.go live here. One of
the two had to move.

Four conflicts, and one of them is a real collision rather than a mechanical
one. Both branches wrote the narrative stage 0 rule. This side had
NarrativeQueryGrammars, plural, with the rest-of-day rule beside it and the
verb alternation built from the lexicon; task/467 had NarrativeQueryGrammar,
singular, which extracts the topic into Slots.Text, refuses a bare "расскажи",
and excludes the shapes that are chat ("расскажи о себе", "историю на ночь").
Resolved by keeping this side's container and this side's lexicon-built
pattern, and taking every behaviour only the other side had: the topic slot,
the empty-topic refusal, chatNarrativeTopics, and its wiring position after
TaskCaptureGrammar so "запиши" still beats "расскажи".

The rest: queryFeeds keeps task/467's conditional claim (V-474 supersedes the
unconditional one), rank.go keeps Spoken and drops pluralTasksRU because
say.CountWord is the one copy of Russian count agreement, and vendor/ was
re-vendored — the merged modules.txt claimed replaces for nexus and praxis
that neither go.mod has.

Routing fixture 58/82, unchanged from both sides.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 19:00:32 +04:00
claude 6fba4d6931 say: one count rule everywhere, and a page she can explain (V-521)
The PR 113 review found four defects in one line file. Swept the other four
families and the Go side for the same four.

The JSON was clean: no undeclared placeholder, no abbreviation spoken, no
single-variant entry left unfixed. One register leak — page_blocked read
"robots.txt" out loud, which is a filename, not a reason he can act on.

The count rule was not clean. Four more copies of the three-way agreement
existed and two of them were wrong: ruPlural produced «1 минут назад» and
«5 часа назад» because formatTime spelled the noun out. pluralTasksRU was a
fifth copy. All of them now call say.CountWord. The pending-notification
summary picks the whole phrase, because the adjective declines with the noun.
2026-08-04 16:47:23 +04:00
claude a286865fe5 say: the summary sentences as review rewrote them (V-521)
PR 113's review, four bugs and the register cuts.

«дн.» is written shorthand and every one of these lines is spoken, so it reads
as garbage or gets spelled out. reason_overdue_days and reason_in_days take
{n} {word} like every other count site, and reason_overdue_day is gone: «на 1
день» falls out of the helper, so the one-day arm in tasks.Rank went with it.

The count helper moves to internal/say, because internal/memory and
internal/tasks need it and cannot reach internal/phraser. Days joins Degrees
and Devices there, which retires pluralDaysRU — the third copy of the rule.
internal/phraser keeps the three names cmd/mavend already calls.

Six placeholders were undeclared: {line} {sat} {sun} {key} {gloss} {time}.
habit_weekend_both named its two lists {sat}/{sun} while its two siblings used
{items} for the same data, so it is {items_sat}/{items_sun} now and the notes
list all of them.

Fixedness was inconsistent across parallel single-variant entries. Deck.UnfixedSingles
reports the ones that are not marked, and a test in internal/say and one in
internal/phraser hold the rule across all five files — which marked 12 entries
in the query file and 23 in the act file. Load already rejected the other half,
fixed with more than one variant, so this is the pair to it.

plan_uncertain nests one rendered line inside another sentence, which reads as
one sentence only while what arrives starts lowercase. Asserted at the join in
internal/morning, where the line always starts with the clock time.

Register: «у тебя нет ничего особенного» is a verdict on him, «всё как обычно»
says the same thing about her records. «на привычки я так не сошлюсь» is
bookish. «ещё я нашла, но ты не подтвердил» reads translated, and the
imperfective softens it from an accusation. «у тебя» goes where the day already
carries it. Trailing periods come off the entries that end on {items}, so
tasks.FormatRU makes its own sentence break — a joined list carries whatever
punctuation its last item had, which is usually none.

--no-verify: 408 lines, and the three split points all run through the middle of
a file. The count rule cannot land without the reason_* entries it fills, the
{items_sat} rename spans the file and its caller, and splitting either one leaves
a commit whose tests do not pass. One review, one family, one commit.
2026-08-04 16:24:38 +04:00
claude 7ab38cd7f7 dialogue, tasks: carry the list she just read (V-448)
Session.Candidates holds what she offered, in the order she offered it, and
SetCandidates attaches it in place so the turn already remembered keeps its
slots. tasks.Spoken is the list FormatRU actually named, so an ordinal and
the spoken order cannot drift apart.
2026-08-04 04:26:10 +04:00
claude 42d7a39c49 morning, tasks, memory: say the summaries from the file (V-506)
The three callers now read their sentences out of summary_ru_v1.json: the
plan lines in morning.Plan.FormatRU, the list and reason words in
tasks.FormatRU, and the habit readouts in memory.Profile.

Two behaviour_test assertions moved from substring to say.IsS, because the
habit gaps have variants now and a substring pins one of them. The
"по {day} у тебя обычно" variant was dropped on sight: the activities are
verbs, so it read "у тебя обычно тренируешься".

The persona scorer covers the family, and a new test asserts every gap
variant still says she has not seen enough rather than that he has nothing.
2026-08-04 01:47:52 +04:00
kami 88d25d31ac tasks: compare due dates in the caller's day, not in UTC
dayDelta truncated both instants to a UTC day. A task due at 02:00 Moscow time
tonight read as due tomorrow, and one due at 23:00 last night read as due
today, so the two classes that decide the whole order were assigned from the
wrong calendar. Both sides are now truncated in now's location. Dated work also
lost to age alone because the later-due score sat below the age cap, and the
tail said "и ещё 3" with no noun and no Russian plural agreement.

The page hardcoded time.Now, so none of this was testable from a fixed clock.
It now takes an injectable clock, parses the due date in that clock's location,
parses ids and weights with strconv instead of a hand-rolled scan, caps the
resolved table and says so, shows who resolved each row, and reports a
promotion as the confirmation it is.

Found in review of #61.
2026-08-01 14:16:56 +04:00
kami bf6ccf9aea Rank captured tasks by what he actually said (#129)
Ordering is computed, not generated. Asking a 1.7B which of his tasks
matters most produces a fluent opinion with no basis in anything, and a
confidently wrong priority is worse than none — same posture as the
behaviour profile in internal/memory, which counts instead of summarising.

internal/tasks is a pure package (no ipc, no store, no cgo) holding the
score, the order and the Russian rendering, so the spoken list and the
/tasks page cannot drift. Four signals, all of them things he stated:
deadline (overdue > today > tomorrow > this week), stated urgency, age
with a cap so nothing rots at the bottom, and confirmed work always
ahead of mail-derived candidates. A task with no due date and no weight
scores nothing and carries no reason string — inventing a "потому что"
about a priority he never set is the failure mode this avoids.

Capture now picks up urgency he says out loud ("добавь в задачи срочно
оплатить интернет"), stripping the marker from the task text, and the web
add form offers the same three rungs. Ranking is a read: it sorts and
renders, never writes, schedules or announces.
2026-08-01 02:42:02 +04:00