States sorted every entity by id and cut at MaxEntities. Entity ids sort
by domain prefix, so binary_sensor came first and forty slots went to
connectivity and update-available rows: propose found nothing
controllable, and homeSummary, reading the same list, said everything
was off with the lights on. The cap stays, because a tool name the 1.7B
half-remembers is a wrong act. What changes is which forty. Controllable
domains are taken first and round-robin, so every switch and light is in
before any sensor.
CallService reported done for a call that changed nothing. Home
Assistant answers a service call with the states it changed, and a
removed entity or an offline integration gets 200 and an empty array.
That is the one place Maven asserts something about the physical world,
so an empty array is now ErrUnknownEntity.
The confirm turn on a house row was a column, not an invariant. The
proposal is destructive, but /tools writes the checkbox through on
enable, so unticking it once made an unlock row that ran on first
hearing. Exec now demands the second turn for any smarthome row whatever
the column says, and lock is out of the default domain set so a bare
block does not propose an unlock for every door.
wireSmartHome enumerated the house synchronously, inside wireVoice,
before the socket was serving and inside the unlock handler. A box that
black-holes the connection held the daemon's start for the per-call
timeout. The first propose moved onto the ticker goroutine.
Smaller: an unreachable lamp is counted apart from an off one, a
truncated on-list says how many it left out, refresh has a floor of a
minute, and the http url is documented as a deliberate wg-only choice.
Found in review of #80.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
A `smarthome` block points Maven at a Home Assistant instance. She reads its
entity states to answer "что включено дома?", and every controllable device
becomes a PROPOSED row in the existing act allowlist — cmd
["smarthome",<entity_id>,<service>], scope smarthome:<domain> — so nothing new
had to be invented for the mutating half. ProposeTool/EnableTool/DisableTool,
tool.Matcher and the confirm turn are untouched; one branch in Executor.Exec
routes such a row to the client instead of exec, and "smarthome" is never run as
a binary. This is the same trick overnight/mcp-tools used for #251, on purpose.
Discovery only ever PROPOSES, and every control row is destructive=true: there
is no read-only way to turn the heating off, so flipping something in his flat
always costs a confirm turn and always had to be enabled by hand on /tools,
behind step-up.
The entity and the service come from the row he enabled, never from the
utterance — Exec drops the spoken tail for a house row. A router that misheard
can pick the wrong lamp; it cannot compose a target of its own. The service is
checked against the domain's table on the way out too, so a hand-edited cmd
column cannot reach an arbitrary Home Assistant service. set_brightness and
set_temperature are deliberately absent: a spoken number the router got wrong is
a wrong act on real hardware, and on/off is the whole of what a voice turn can
defend.
The read side is a query source ("home", before calendar and the recall passes)
so "что нового дома?" is not answered from an old note. Its matcher needs a
house marker plus an ask plus a device word and bails out on weather wording,
because "какая температура на улице?" belongs to the weather source.
Off unless configured: the block is dark without "enabled": true, and
applyDefaults normalises a disabled block to nil so "off" stays in one place.
deploy/mavend.json carries it disabled, with the token as ${HA_TOKEN}.
NOT shipped, and not faked: MQTT / Zigbee2MQTT (plan steps 2 and 5) and the
sensor-to-fact and presence-probe pipelines. There is no broker and no Home
Assistant anywhere on this network — 8123 and 1883 are closed on every host in
192.168.1.0/24 — the module tree is vendored so a paho dependency cannot be
added offline, and Home Assistant already fronts Zigbee2MQTT where it exists.
Writing a sensor pipeline with no sensor to test it against would be a guess.
Vikunja #256
kami