CheckFeminine flagged "ты заплатил за домен" as a masculine self-reference.
The second pass reads a masculine past-tense verb before "тебе", "тебя" or
"за" as her speaking with the pronoun dropped, and it checked neither the
subject nor what "за" pointed at. He is male, so a verb governed by "ты"
must be masculine, and "за домен" is a price rather than a favour.
The talk fixture was under-reporting by a point whenever a reply addressed
him in the past tense, which is common.
The phrasing run produced two persona breaks that scored clean:
"Приходите… Жду вас" (formal plural) and "Он не ел 11 дней" (talks
about him instead of to him). She is feminine, he is male, and she
speaks to him informally, one to one.
The new `address` check flags the "вы" family, plural imperative
endings, and a third-person "он" with no other subject named earlier in
the message. Like `hisgender` it is a keyword/suffix heuristic, not a
parser, and it prints the word it tripped on so a false alarm is easy to
dismiss. Limits are written out in the comment.
Both recorded strings are pinned as unit tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Review internal/phraser/eval/checks.go -- it IS the measurement. Each check
names in a comment which DESIGN.md line it defends: length, feminine
self-reference (windowed around "я" so the operator's own masculine
second-person forms are not flagged), the cringe list (pet names, emoji,
"!!", fake concern, apology, emotional support, asking how he feels,
praise), on-topic, mood enum. No send/veto signal anywhere, per
DESIGN.md § "Rules decide, LLM phrases".
Fixture (158 lines) and tests (252) do not count toward the diff ceiling;
the scorer itself is still ~650. Splitting eval.go from checks.go would
give two commits neither of which measures anything.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
claude
kami