Ships the real, local, testable part of the memory-evaluation plan
(docs/plans/03-memory-evaluation.md): Maven reads back her own recent
memory on a slow ticker, asks the resident model what it notices, and
records the confident answers as notes.
internal/memeval — not internal/memory/eval.go as the plan says, because
internal/store imports internal/memory for the vector backend and an
evaluator has to read store.Fact/Note/Nudge, which would close the
cycle. Evaluate() gathers RecentFacts/RecentNotes/RecentNudges, prompts
under a GBNF grammar bounded to three {observation, confidence,
suggested_action} objects, drops anything under min_confidence,
deduplicates against what earlier runs wrote, and writes the rest as
notes with source infer:memory-eval. /dash already renders notes with
their source, so the output is visible with no UI change.
cmd/mavend/memoryeval.go drives it on its own goroutine and ticker, not
on the 60s tick: an evaluation is a multi-second round-trip on the same
llama-server that answers voice turns, and it runs hourly at most. The
memory_eval config block is absent by default and absence means the
goroutine does not exist. No llama-server phraser also means no loop —
there is no template fallback, because a "memory evaluation" assembled
from templates is a fixed sentence pretending to be an observation.
What it deliberately cannot do, since this is the feature most likely to
turn Maven into a nag:
- It cannot speak. No dispatcher reference, no channel, no nudge. An
observation is a thought she wrote down and he reads on /dash.
Announcing them is a separate decision with its own opt-in.
- It cannot act. suggested_action is recorded as text and interpreted
by nobody — no reminder, routine or fact is created from it.
- It says nothing about an empty store: no memory means no LLM call,
so there are no observations invented out of two facts.
- Its own notes are excluded from the next evaluation's input, and are
written with a nil embedding so they stay out of the recall pool.
The plan's remaining items (dispatching observations, an /eval IPC
method and trace view, RecentEvents) and the fact that output quality is
entirely unmeasured are written up at the bottom of the plan doc.
Add a read-only /ecosystem page that consumes the sibling services'
JSON APIs (Nexus entities, Praxis attention, Hexis capabilities),
fetched concurrently with honest per-panel error states. Siblings stay
headless — mavweb is their human surface (arch §16). Wired via mavweb
-nexus/-praxis/-hexis flags; mavweb joins the ecosystem compose network.
Fix mobile horizontal overflow across all pages: .content is a flex
child with default min-width:auto, so it refused to shrink below the
tables' intrinsic width. min-width:0 lets wide tables pan inside .scroll
instead of dragging the page sideways. Verified via CDP geometry check
(scrollWidth === clientWidth at 430px).
Also includes in-progress Ethos UI redesign, ecosystem deploy compose,
and planning docs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Route contract is now a JSON array of action objects (one per ask) so
compound utterances route all their intents, not just the first. Grammar
root emits `[{intent...},...]`; parseActions tolerates a bare object.
Cascade still returns one Decision — full N-action dispatch lands with the
engine turn-on (marked in-code).
Router prompt rewritten shorter + decision-ordered (prompt-guy feedback),
fact redefined as "implicit update" not "trackable state", kept in Russian
to match the CPT base + phraser. "интент" → "намерение".
CLAUDE.md: routing-architecture section + refreshed open items.
docs/plans: route-data generation plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017GMrVfuYN3nE4L1vEiFYC9
Daemon side of Decision B: parse {"response","mood"} across the 4 consumers
(replier, nudges, reminders, chat), fall back to legacy formats. Drop the
LLM router — the classifier handles routing; replier/phraser share one
llm.Client (timeout 20s->60s). llm.Client reads reasoning_content when
content is empty (thinking models).
Docs: TTS piper-student plan (OmniVoice teacher -> piper student, from
scratch, phoneme-first). CLAUDE.md training guide.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add reactive_notes_test.go: tests for context-aware reactive nudge
generation using LLM phraser with dialogue history.
- Add docs/plans/2026-07-10-router-lfm-foundation.md: architecture research
on replacing classifier cascade with LFM-based router.
kami