The review comment asked for basic DI. The answer is the idiom voice.go
already had for capabilities — a cohesive *Wiring struct — applied to a
group that is not a capability toggle, plus the decision written down so
it is a rule and not a habit.
recallWiring holds the embedder, the vector store, the personal boundary
and the two numbers that gate an answer. They sat in three places on
reactiveHandler, with the gate numbers a hundred lines from the store
they gate. Its zero value means no recall, so it is a value, not a
pointer like the optional-capability groups.
dataStore stays out of it. patterns.go, ecosystem_acts.go and confirm.go
use it, so it is not part of this cluster.
docs/handler-wiring.md records the choice, rejects a container or a
wire-style generator outright, defers narrow per-handler interfaces to
the package split that would justify them, and states the constraint the
task named: a wiring change does not ride a feature PR.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"что я говорил про бэкапы?" is his data by definition, and nothing outside the
box has ever heard him say anything. The boundary matched possession words only,
so the question walked past it into SearXNG and came back answered out of a Habr
article about somebody else's backups.
A speech-verb marker class was written first and dropped. Russian gives every
verb a dozen surface forms and the "как я говорил, ..." preamble list has no end,
so each form the lexicon missed was one more question reaching the world, and a
missing verb looks exactly like no bug.
The boundary now embeds two frozen seed sets and scores the turn's own query
vector, already computed upstream, against both. Nearest side wins. The
possession markers stay as the offline floor for a handler with no embedder.
19/19 held-out utterances correct against multilingual-e5-small; see
docs/evals/2026-08-03-personal-boundary.md. The live probe on the deployed box is
not done.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
claude