Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
kami 89d83c0b11 Record the example-led nudge prompt experiment (#393) — it made things worse
Tried rewriting the nudge prompt to lead with five on-topic examples instead
of rules. Three eval runs each side: before 12/13/14 of 15, after 11/12/11.
The loss is all in the address check — formal "вы" and plural imperatives came
back once the "говоришь на ты" rule stopped being its own sentence, and the
on-topic examples leaked their wording into the wrong cases.

Prompt reverted. Only the finding is committed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
2026-07-31 15:40:18 +04:00
kami 10cf6f525c Check that nudges do not address the owner in the feminine
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
2026-07-31 12:54:18 +04:00
kami 74a70880a8 Write up the phrasing eval: 0/15 to 13/15, and what the number hides
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
2026-07-31 12:23:54 +04:00