Two defects found probing the new source on the box.
"кто ты" was answered from one of his notes. The self source sat below
memory and notes, which match by proximity and have no idea the subject
is her. It belongs above all three: a question about her has no answer
in his data either.
And PhraseQuery opens every answer with "вот что я нашла: ", which is
deliberate — it marks the answer as a lookup. Her own description is the
one subject she did not look up, so this is PhraseSelf instead, same
read-only discipline and its own opener. The Stub reads the description
out as it stands, which needs no fallback: it is already her voice.
"что ты умеешь" reached the personal boundary, which claimed it as his
and said "не знаю — не нашла у тебя такой записи" about her own
description. Letting it past would be no better: SearXNG answers about
somebody else's assistant.
A self query source above the boundary, reading one frozen description.
It is NOT a note — notes are his, and a note about her would come back
for "что я записал", would be fed to the digestion worker as something
he said, and would be recalled by proximity for questions that are not
about her.
The description names only what this box does. Everything that depends
on config — the house, the LAN, the feeds, the list, weather, telegram —
is named as depending on what he allowed, and a test pins that split:
inventing a capability here is the same defect as inventing a fact.
topicSelf is scored like every other topic, with a narrow keyword floor
for the no-embedder case. "что ты умеешь" moved off topicOther, where it
had been sitting so an attention question had something to lose to — a
phrasing on two sides never clears the margin. TestONNXTopics 38/38 ->
43/43 on held-out utterances.
claude