dayDelta truncated both instants to a UTC day. A task due at 02:00 Moscow time
tonight read as due tomorrow, and one due at 23:00 last night read as due
today, so the two classes that decide the whole order were assigned from the
wrong calendar. Both sides are now truncated in now's location. Dated work also
lost to age alone because the later-due score sat below the age cap, and the
tail said "и ещё 3" with no noun and no Russian plural agreement.
The page hardcoded time.Now, so none of this was testable from a fixed clock.
It now takes an injectable clock, parses the due date in that clock's location,
parses ids and weights with strconv instead of a hand-rolled scan, caps the
resolved table and says so, shows who resolved each row, and reports a
promotion as the confirmation it is.
Found in review of #61.
Ordering is computed, not generated. Asking a 1.7B which of his tasks
matters most produces a fluent opinion with no basis in anything, and a
confidently wrong priority is worse than none — same posture as the
behaviour profile in internal/memory, which counts instead of summarising.
internal/tasks is a pure package (no ipc, no store, no cgo) holding the
score, the order and the Russian rendering, so the spoken list and the
/tasks page cannot drift. Four signals, all of them things he stated:
deadline (overdue > today > tomorrow > this week), stated urgency, age
with a cap so nothing rots at the bottom, and confirmed work always
ahead of mail-derived candidates. A task with no due date and no weight
scores nothing and carries no reason string — inventing a "потому что"
about a priority he never set is the failure mode this avoids.
Capture now picks up urgency he says out loud ("добавь в задачи срочно
оплатить интернет"), stripping the marker from the task text, and the web
add form offers the same three rungs. Ranking is a read: it sorts and
renders, never writes, schedules or announces.
kami