reminder_cancel.go is a stateful pre-route resolver ahead of a parked
clarification and the statistical cascade. It accepts only an addressed
command-position imperative plus the reminder or alarm noun, so questions,
reported speech, past-tense reports and prohibitions establish no mutation
authority. Subject terms keep negation and quantity, and a parsed time
passes the same resolved-hour gate as capture.
One match cancels through the typed IPC method. Several are stored as
session candidates in the spoken order, capped at five, and only a whole
affirmative ordinal consumes that list: re-querying on the follow-up would
let a state change move the ordinal underneath him. No match, an unread
time, a spent ordinal and an ambiguous delivery result are all explicit
no-ops.
command_prohibition.go is the first mutation boundary in a turn. A direct
prohibition clears the three confirmation slots under their shared mutex,
so a later bare "да" cannot revive authority he has just revoked. A parked
clarify question is not authority and survives, suspended and repeated.
refusesCommand is the same belt at the executor entry points, checked
against the original utterance so a model rewriting Slots.Text cannot get
around it.
The rung is named in preRouteLadder, so /trace records whether it won or
declined on every surface.
--no-verify: master is the working branch this session by the owner's call.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"я выпил воды" came back as "Проверила, что ты выпел стакан воды". The
verb is not a Russian word, the glass was never mentioned, and nothing
had been checked.
The store was right throughout: DefaultFactParser files this as
key=water value="drank", and no row anywhere held "стакан". Every
Russian word in that sentence was generated. replyContext hands the
model "записала факт: water \"drank\"", so the model had nothing to
phrase FROM and reached for the nearest plausible sentence — the example
in ReplySystemPrompt, which was literally "Записала, что ты выпил стакан
воды."
So the fact path stops generating, the way the note payload did in
V-576. The confirmation is a fixed deck frame with his own sentence in
it, in both repliers, and the prompt example is contentless now. The
stub also read the parser's KEY back at him, which is machine
vocabulary he never said.
The clarify half of this — a fact clarified out of "запиши" answers with
"запиши" and nothing else — lands with V-593, which touches the same
lines.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The checks stay in the eval package and the daemon calls three of them:
feminine, address, and a new leaked-reasoning test. No retry — it doubles
the latency on the turn that is already going badly, and on the nudge path
the moment has passed. A failure falls back to the deterministic floor and
is logged with the whole rejected text and counted by check name.
hisgender is deliberately not run: the simulator showed it rejecting
"записала, что ты выпил воды", which is her own correct self-reference.
Every clarify turn said one sentence per gap, and a re-ask repeated it word
for word. A question he already failed to answer is the worst one to ask
again unchanged: the second wording is what tells him which part she missed.
clarifytemplates.go holds three wordings per slot, picked by attempt rather
than at random — short first, then naming the gap, then spelling it out with
an example. Past the end she keeps the most explicit one instead of wrapping
back to the short question he has already not answered.
The intents with nothing identifiable to ask about (note, query, chat,
system) kept the stub's single "не совсем поняла — можешь переформулировать?",
which is the line he hears whenever she misses him completely. Four wordings
now, picked by a hash of the utterance so one question asked twice reads the
same and two different misses do not.
Still no model call on this path: the resident model would wander, and this
text has to be right every time. No schema_version either, unlike the nudge
templates — these are Go constants, so no file can drift out of step with the
code that reads it. The persona test already in clarify_test.go covers the
new lines.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The prompt, the call and the output parsing now live in internal/phraser. What is
left here is the one thing the daemon adds: a clarify, a model error and an
unusable generation all answer from voice.StubReplier, so a turn never breaks on
the model. The duplicated stripThink and parseResponseMood copies are gone;
capture.go uses phraser.StripThink.
The replier and the meeting summariser were the two call sites without a
GBNF. Both are exactly the shape that makes a Thinking variant answer with
its reasoning as prose, and neither had anything downstream that could
remove it.
The replier already parses {"response","mood"}, so it now sends the phraser's
grammar for that contract, exported once as phraser.ResponseGrammar so the
two definitions cannot drift.
The summariser stays text-in/text-out. The JSON wrapper is attached and
unwrapped in the daemon's Completer, so internal/capture is unchanged and a
Completer without a grammar still works.
The simulator told routing from phrasing by "has a grammar", which stopped
being true here; it now looks for the intent enum.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wording fixes from the review of the clarify + phrasing PRs.
- "На когда напомнить?" → "Когда?". After she has just been asked something,
the long form is the phrasing of a form field, not of a person.
- A reminder now wants a subject as well as a time. "напомни в 11" had a time
and nothing to say at 11, and she asked nothing at all — she now asks
"О чём напомнить?". Subject first, since a reminder with no subject is not
worth setting.
- The expiry notice is five phrasings picked at random instead of one fixed
sentence. It is the line he hears every time he walks off mid-request, so it
is the line that repeats most.
- The nudge prompt's ban on "обращения" is now "ласковые обращения". It was
meant to forbid "милый"/"дорогой", not his name — "Ками, ноутбук на трёх
процентах" is how she talks, and the eval's cringe check already only flags
pet names.
- The nudge example no longer claims she plugged the laptop in. She has no
hands and no smart plug; an example where she acts teaches the model to
invent actions Maven never took.
- replySystem: "тепло" → "спокойно и без официальных формулировок". A one-word
mood instruction a 1.7B can't act on, replaced with the behaviour meant.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The "address him as ты" rule had only reached two of the five system
prompts. Instead of pasting it into the other three (five copies drift —
that is how this happened), there is now one block, in internal/persona,
prepended to all five: nudges, action replies, chat, note queries and
general knowledge.
The block says who he is and how to address him (a man, always "ты",
never "вы", never "он" about him; Maven stays feminine), plus the
current local date and time. It is rendered fresh each turn because the
time changes, and it is correct with an empty config — the address and
gender rules are defaults in code. Config only adds optional facts:
owner_name, city, and the existing free-text `persona` string, which is
now the static half of the block.
Russian even in front of the English prompts: the rules are Russian
grammar, so they read best stated in Russian, and there is one copy.
Vikunja #394.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The prompts stated the feminine self-reference rule but never said whom she is
speaking to, so the model produced formal plural ("Жду вас") and talked about
him in third person ("Он не ел 11 дней"). Adds the address rule right next to
the feminine one, in the nudge prompt and the confirmation prompt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The system prompt showed the JSON contract as {"response": "..."} and the
user prompt repeated it. A 0.8B copies whatever sits in the response slot, so
7 of 15 nudges came back as literally "...".
Changes, all prompt-side — the {"response","mood"} contract is unchanged:
- nudge system prompt is Russian, feminine self-reference, with filled-in
examples on topics that never appear as rules, so copying them is visible
- rule names get a Russian gloss and a required keyword, named last in the
prompt where a small model weights it hardest
- durations render in Russian, not English
- the no-parse fallback says something Russian instead of "water — care",
which was going straight to a Russian piper voice
- same "..." placeholder removed from replier_llm.go
Scored on internal/phraser/eval: 0/15 -> 13/15.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The most load-bearing decision in the project was stated four incompatible
ways: the docs said Qwen3-1.7B, deploy/mavend.json said Qwen3.5-2B, the repo's
models/llm/ held an LFM2.5-1.2B gguf, and five code comments still said LFM.
Answering "which model is deployed" meant re-deriving it from scratch every
time.
Two facts the review missed, found while resolving it:
- /mnt/hdd1/llms is bind-mounted over /opt/maven/models/llm, which shadows the
repo's models/llm/. The LFM2.5 gguf sitting there was never loaded by
anything, so it was not evidence of the deployed model at all.
- That library holds Qwen3.5-0.8B, -2B and -4B, and no Qwen3-1.7B. The config
pointed at a file that does exist; the docs' Qwen3-1.7B was the stale claim,
the reverse of the assumed direction. Qwen3-1.7B is the CPT target, and that
training is still in flight (Vikunja #122), so no such gguf exists yet.
phraser.model_path moves to Qwen3.5-0.8B (Q4_K_M) — the smallest checkpoint on
disk, chosen for latency, and relevant to whether the LLM router is affordable
on this box. Docs and comments now say the same thing in one voice: 0.8B
resident now, CPT'd Qwen3-1.7B as the target, and the bind-mount shadowing
written down so the next reader does not mistake models/llm/ for ground truth.
Comments name the model, never a filename, so a swap stays a one-line config
change.
n_gpu_layers: 99 is correct and stays — compose passes /dev/dri and the render
gid for Vulkan offload to the Vega iGPU. CLAUDE.md's "CPU-only" was the stale
half of that contradiction and is corrected.
phraser.go also dropped a wrong "sub-1b, prompted not trained" size claim: the
target is trained end-to-end (RU CPT + joint persona/router SFT).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X5JApcrCRVGmqrxnhynSik
Daemon side of Decision B: parse {"response","mood"} across the 4 consumers
(replier, nudges, reminders, chat), fall back to legacy formats. Drop the
LLM router — the classifier handles routing; replier/phraser share one
llm.Client (timeout 20s->60s). llm.Client reads reasoning_content when
content is empty (thinking models).
Docs: TTS piper-student plan (OmniVoice teacher -> piper student, from
scratch, phoneme-first). CLAUDE.md training guide.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add llmphraser: LFM-based phraser implementing Phraser interface with
PhraseChat, PhraseNudge, PhraseReactive, and PhraseReminder methods.
- Add shared internal/llm/client: llama-server completion client used by
both the phraser (talking back) and router (routing), sharing one model.
- Add LLMReplier in mavend: replaces StubReplier for chat/nudge/reactive
replies, falls back to stub on model errors.
- Update Phraser interface: add PhraseChat method, update stub to match.
- Wire LLM phaser into mavend voice init, plumb LLM config from JSON.
claude
kami