The checks stay in the eval package and the daemon calls three of them:
feminine, address, and a new leaked-reasoning test. No retry — it doubles
the latency on the turn that is already going badly, and on the nudge path
the moment has passed. A failure falls back to the deterministic floor and
is logged with the whole rejected text and counted by check name.
hisgender is deliberately not run: the simulator showed it rejecting
"записала, что ты выпил воды", which is her own correct self-reference.
Nine reply cases and a fourth column in the talk report. The reply path is a
separate object from the phraser in the daemon, so Pair joins a Talker and a
Confirmer for a run that covers everything Maven says.
Cases carry intent/key/value because the replier is phrased from the decision the
router resolved, not from the raw utterance. Three of them are baits the other
paths cannot produce: a masculine verb about himself that she must not copy onto
herself, a polite plural input that must still come back на ты, and an unresolved
note that invites a question a confirmation is not allowed to ask.
Not scored against a model here — this box has no llama-server, and the baseline
test is opt-in on MAVEN_LLM_URL.
Seventeen markdown files at the repo root, twelve of them dated one-shot
reports sitting next to CLAUDE.md. That is why stale docs read as
current: nothing in the path said which was which.
Root now keeps CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md. Living docs move under docs/
and carry a Last verified line. Dated measurements move to docs/evals/
ISO-prefixed, and are never edited after the day, so a newer number is
a new file. The senior review moves to docs/archive/.
Every reference was rewritten across markdown, Go comments, the Makefile
and the recall fixture. The touched Go packages still build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nudge wording as data instead of generation. The wording lives in
internal/phraser/nudges_ru_v1.json (embedded), about 10 variants per rule:
water, meal, break, service_down, netdata_critical, routine:, morning:, plus
a contentless default. That JSON is long because it is data — the owner can
edit any line of Russian without touching Go.
The picker:
- random, but never the same variant twice in a row for the same rule
- deterministic when seeded (math/rand with an injectable source)
- fills {since} / {service} / {what} from the candidate, and skips any variant
whose value is missing, so no raw placeholder can reach the piper voice
- {since} is spelled out in words ("полтора часа", "семь часов"), because
"3 ч" is wrong in a Russian voice
Scores 15/15 on the existing nudge fixture, on every seed swept. Nothing is
wired yet — that is the next commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
It scored 27/27 on a run where two replies were "{" and "{\n \"". It only
tested that the string was not blank, so punctuation counted as content and
the worst replies of the run passed the first check.
Now a reply needs at least one letter, Cyrillic or Latin. Latin counts
because answers about ssd or vpn are legitimately part English.
Digits alone fail too. The same run answered "сколько варить яйцо
вкрутую?" with "15-16" — no unit, no words, and the wrong number as well.
That is not something she said.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
From a real reply in a nudge eval run: "Смотрите на его потребление
воды" is a plural imperative AND third person about him. Only the plural
printed.
Two separate faults. The check returned on its first hit, so the second
break stayed invisible and the failure read as milder than it was; it now
joins them. And "его" was not detected at all — looksVerb knows the
-й/-йте imperative but not the -те plural, so "смотрите" counted as the
person being talked about, which is what an antecedent means here.
pluralVerb already knows that form, so the antecedent test uses it too.
Third time a verb form has blinded this check. A fourth means it wants a
morphology table rather than another suffix.
The phrasing fixture was 15 nudge cases, so every prompt change we
measured only told us about nudges. But the shared context block sits in
front of five prompts, and three of them — chat, note query, general
knowledge — had no scorer at all. Those are the long free-form replies,
where a persona break is most likely and where nothing could see one.
27 cases, nine per path. Nine rather than five because the nudge fixture
already cannot resolve a change smaller than about three cases, and a
per-path score off five would be worse.
Reuses the persona checks instead of copying them. Length, mood and
"no questions" are left out on purpose: these paths return no mood, and
a follow-up question is a feature in chat, not a fault.
The run refuses to score unless the model answers before and after it.
PhraseChat and PhraseQuery swallow model errors and return a canned
string, so without that guard a dead server produces a full report with
zero errors and a bad score — which reads as bad phrasing rather than as
nothing measured. Vikunja #397 is the real fix.
The "address him as ты" rule had only reached two of the five system
prompts. Instead of pasting it into the other three (five copies drift —
that is how this happened), there is now one block, in internal/persona,
prepended to all five: nudges, action replies, chat, note queries and
general knowledge.
The block says who he is and how to address him (a man, always "ты",
never "вы", never "он" about him; Maven stays feminine), plus the
current local date and time. It is rendered fresh each turn because the
time changes, and it is correct with an empty config — the address and
gender rules are defaults in code. Config only adds optional facts:
owner_name, city, and the existing free-text `persona` string, which is
now the static half of the block.
Russian even in front of the English prompts: the rules are Russian
grammar, so they read best stated in Russian, and there is one copy.
Vikunja #394.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The third-person check asks whether anyone else was named before "он".
A nudge is mostly verbs, and they were counted as possible people, so
"попробуй встать и отдохнуть — у него есть перерыв" passed. Infinitives
and imperatives now join past tense as words that cannot be a person.
A plain noun before the pronoun still blinds it. That needs a parser,
and the comment says so.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The check asks whether anyone else was named before "он". Time words
were not stoplisted, so "сегодня он не ел" read "сегодня" as the person
being talked about and passed — which is the recorded break with a word
in front of it, and nudges open with those words constantly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The phrasing eval printed "llm (0.8B, ...)" no matter which gguf
llama-server had loaded, so two runs of two different models came out
named the same and were easy to mix up when comparing.
It now asks llama-server over /v1/models, same as the router eval
already did. The helper moved to internal/llm so both share it, and it
now errors instead of returning a blank name when the id field is
missing — an unreachable server gets labelled "unknown-model", never a
plausible-looking guess.
Both eval paths stay opt-in behind MAVEN_LLM_URL; no server needed for
go test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
The phrasing run produced two persona breaks that scored clean:
"Приходите… Жду вас" (formal plural) and "Он не ел 11 дней" (talks
about him instead of to him). She is feminine, he is male, and she
speaks to him informally, one to one.
The new `address` check flags the "вы" family, plural imperative
endings, and a third-person "он" with no other subject named earlier in
the message. Like `hisgender` it is a keyword/suffix heuristic, not a
parser, and it prints the word it tripped on so a false alarm is easy to
dismiss. Limits are written out in the comment.
Both recorded strings are pinned as unit tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Review internal/phraser/eval/checks.go -- it IS the measurement. Each check
names in a comment which DESIGN.md line it defends: length, feminine
self-reference (windowed around "я" so the operator's own masculine
second-person forms are not flagged), the cringe list (pet names, emoji,
"!!", fake concern, apology, emotional support, asking how he feels,
praise), on-topic, mood enum. No send/veto signal anywhere, per
DESIGN.md § "Rules decide, LLM phrases".
Fixture (158 lines) and tests (252) do not count toward the diff ceiling;
the scorer itself is still ~650. Splitting eval.go from checks.go would
give two commits neither of which measures anything.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
claude
kami
kami