The daemon tests that compared against one literal ask the entry instead: IsAck
names the line she could have said without pinning the wording. The eval scores
every ack variant on the persona checks the nudges already pass.
The snooze wire had one end. "готово" and "выпил воды" both left the nudge
pending, so the auto-tuner only ever learned from deferrals and from
silence — never from the rule working.
Two entry points, because the two utterances are different acts. A bare
"готово" carries no content and is intercepted before the router, sharing
pendingNudge and the twenty-minute window with the snooze. "выпил воды" IS
content: it routes normally, writes its fact, and only then closes the
nudge (ackFromFact, after applyAction). Folding the second into a pre-route
intercept would have thrown away the thing he actually said.
ackFromFact is silent. The fact reply stands; "отлично, отметила" on top
would be her congratulating him for obeying, which is the nag she is not.
Which fact answers which rule comes from the rule's own InertWhenNoData, so
a rule added later is covered the day it lands. "да" and "ок" stay out of
the ack vocabulary: the clarify gate upstream has the stronger claim on
them, and a stray "да" must not rewrite the feedback signal.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
claude
kami