#496 asked to skip the veto when the question and the hit are in
different scripts, so an English question stops losing a Russian note.
Measured first: the fixture has no cross-language case, and en-hard-024
is an English question against an English note. Both proposed fixes are
no-ops.
What the veto actually does on the fixture, with the real embedder: it
costs en-hard-024 and buys ru-silent-029. Pass count is 22/32 either
way; false recall is 0/5 with it and 1/5 without. The two cases are one
lexical class, so no rule cheap enough for RecallAllowed separates them.
Accepts the loss and pins both sides in a test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The score gate cannot separate the right note from an unrelated one: the
held-out fixture puts the right note at 0.791-0.890 and the must-be-silent cases
at 0.795-0.835, so a note about his slow network answered 'почему небо синее?'.
RecallAllowed adds a topic veto, and applies it only to a question that mentions
nothing of his. That restriction is the whole design: demanding a shared word of
every recall silenced four true recalls on the fixture to kill one false one,
because recall exists to find the note whose words he no longer remembers. A
question about his own life keeps the embedder as its only judge.
claude