The phrasing eval printed "llm (0.8B, ...)" no matter which gguf
llama-server had loaded, so two runs of two different models came out
named the same and were easy to mix up when comparing.
It now asks llama-server over /v1/models, same as the router eval
already did. The helper moved to internal/llm so both share it, and it
now errors instead of returning a blank name when the id field is
missing — an unreachable server gets labelled "unknown-model", never a
plausible-looking guess.
Both eval paths stay opt-in behind MAVEN_LLM_URL; no server needed for
go test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
Review internal/phraser/eval/checks.go -- it IS the measurement. Each check
names in a comment which DESIGN.md line it defends: length, feminine
self-reference (windowed around "я" so the operator's own masculine
second-person forms are not flagged), the cringe list (pet names, emoji,
"!!", fake concern, apology, emotional support, asking how he feels,
praise), on-topic, mood enum. No send/veto signal anywhere, per
DESIGN.md § "Rules decide, LLM phrases".
Fixture (158 lines) and tests (252) do not count toward the diff ceiling;
the scorer itself is still ~650. Splitting eval.go from checks.go would
give two commits neither of which measures anything.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
kami