Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
kami 98ee701e03 Let a note win a recall, not only a fact (#373)
The memory pass ran only after the notes-only gate had already rejected
the same note at the same score. Notes and facts share one vector index,
so a note that failed there failed again — the branch could only ever
return a fact.

Now the memory pass runs first: one search over everything Maven
remembers, one gate, and the memory that clearly matches best answers
(a note gets phrased, a fact is read back). The notes-only pass stays
behind it for notes the vector index does not hold. No threshold moved,
so the set of questions answered is unchanged — only which memory
answers them.

Fixture gained two mixed note+fact cases, so the answerable count goes
25 -> 27: hash recall@1 36.0% -> 37.0% (ratchet 0.32 unchanged, comment
updated), e5 recall@1 72.0% -> 70.4%, false recall still 1/5.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
2026-07-31 13:30:38 +04:00
kami 43470abc57 Add a held-out note-recall harness (fixture + scorer)
Measures whether Maven can find the right note again from a paraphrased
question. Review internal/memory/recalleval/recalleval.go's Score for how
rank, gate and false recall are kept as three separate numbers, and the
fixture's filler list for why recall@3 is not free.
Fixture JSON is generated data and does not count toward the diff limit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
2026-07-31 02:18:58 +04:00