The trust boundary is zenmoney, not maven — they already hold his bank
sessions. So the poller reads /v8/diff/ and writes totals as
facts(kind=env, source=poll:zenmoney); core reads those back when he asks
and never sees the token.
internal/zenmoney sums transactions per currency over a window, skipping
tombstoned rows and transfers between his own accounts, and refuses to
encode a summary built from zero transactions. That refusal is the whole
design: a failed or empty read writes nothing and leaves the last good
total alone, because a zero recited as fact is worse than silence. No
currency conversion either — a figure he can check against his bank beats
one he cannot.
Off unless configured, and the token is read from a FILE rather than a
flag so it never lands in `ps`, in docker-compose.yml, or in shell
history. Nothing about the money is search input, no tick rule reads the
keys, and the log lines name keys, never figures.
The live-credential half is BLOCKED: there is no zenmoney account or token
here, so everything is verified against a recorded diff fixture.
A task is not a fact and not a note. A fact is a claim about the world that a
correction supersedes; a note is something to recall by meaning. A task is work
with a lifecycle, and the read that matters is "everything outstanding right
now" — which over an append-only log would mean replaying history on every
question. So: a tasks table, migration #14, statuses candidate/open/done/dropped
that each move forward exactly once.
Dedupe is on normalised text among LIVE rows only, via a partial unique index.
That is the property the mail side needs: an extractor may call CaptureTask for
every message it reads, as often as it likes, without growing the list — while a
weekly errand is still capturable again once the last one is done.
Three ways in, one seam. ipc.CaptureTaskReq is it: the voice path
(router.ParseTaskCapture on an explicit marker — "добавь в задачи …", never
"надо бы поспать"), the /tasks form, and the email reader from #246 when it
exists. Mail-derived items set Source "email:<account>", Status "candidate" and
Evidence to whatever makes the row reviewable; a candidate is inert until he
confirms it on /tasks, and Maven names it as unconfirmed when she recites the
list rather than putting words in his mouth.
No new intent — the router enum is a contract with the relabelling prompt, so
capture rides the note intent and the list rides a query source, both matched
deterministically like the calendar and plan matchers already are.
Nothing here speaks. No tick rule reads tasks; the list is answered when asked
about, which is why /tasks POST is not step-up gated the way /tools and
/routines are — a task write moves no boundary.
Vikunja #130
Behavioural memory, narrowed on purpose. internal/memory/behavior.go builds a
profile out of self-facts — distinct days per weekday, median time of day — and
reads it back in RU; router.ParseHabitQuery finds the weekday deterministically;
a `habits` query source answers the question.
Three things the plan doc asks for are deliberately absent, and the doc now
records why:
- The profile is COUNTED, not LLM-generated. A 1.7B asked to summarise a year of
habits writes fluent claims about the owner's life that no row supports, and a
wrong claim about him is the most expensive kind of wrong maven can be.
- No cached profile fact, so no "update on fact write" machinery. It is
recomputed on the question; a cache that can disagree with its own rows is two
truths.
- No proactive daily plan nudge. A dispatcher proposal at 08:00 every day is the
definition of a nag. The path from "she noticed a pattern" to "she acts on it"
already exists in internal/pattern with the proposal queue on /routines, and it
goes through him.
A one-off is not a habit: an activity needs two distinct days before she will
call it usual, and until then she says she does not know yet. Only self-facts
count — env rows are the world, config rows are her own tuning state. The typical
time is a median so one 03:00 outlier cannot move a morning habit into the night.
An unrecognised fact key is read back verbatim rather than glossed into something
she made up.
The source sits before "calendar" in querySources, and its matcher requires a
habit marker, so "что я делаю в среду?" still reaches the calendar — answering a
question about this coming Wednesday with a statistical average would be
answering a different question.
Verified: make build and make test both exit 0.
The plan answers "какие планы на сегодня?" by putting one day in order:
calendar events (with #126's ambient provenance carried through and hedged),
pending reminders, and one line per morning routine that still has items
outstanding. "что дальше?" trims what has already passed.
It lives in internal/morning, not in a parallel system, because it is the same
question the checklist asks at a different scale — the routine knows what is
missing from a window, the plan knows what the whole day holds, and both read
the same facts and the same idea of "today". BuildPlan is pure; tickLoop.dayPlan
is the impure half that reads the store.
It is not a nag. Nothing here fires, schedules or announces: the plan is built
only when asked, over IPC (day_plan) or on the existing /morning page.
Unprompted delivery stays with the morning nudge and the dispatcher's policy.
The query source sits before "calendar" in querySources because both match
"…на сегодня" and the plan's matcher is the more specific one; IsDayPlanQuery
matches whole words so "планёрка" (a meeting) is not read as a request for the
plan, and refuses any utterance naming another day, since the plan is built for
the clock's own day only.
Verified: make build and make test both exit 0; new tests cover plan ordering,
the checklist-only-what-is-left rule, other-day rejection, the RU rendering
against the persona checks, rest-of-day trimming, the source ordering, and the
matcher's refusals.
Maven does not get a work credential. A corp mail or calendar session living on
the homelab ties the box's blast radius to the employer's data, which is the
thing this task exists to refuse. What she reads instead is the signal: an
Android notification-listener on the phone relays meeting notifications over
wg/LAN to POST /api/ambient, and the ones that clearly describe a meeting become
calendar events at source=ambient:notif, confidence 0.6.
The provenance is the point. A notification is evidence about a meeting, not a
reading of a calendar, so it is never indistinguishable from one: it is stored
below full confidence, store.CalendarEvents keeps the source and confidence on
every row it returns, and the query path hedges — "похоже, Планёрка @ 14:00" for
a relayed event, plain text for a CalDAV read.
The parse is deliberately conservative (internal/calendar/ambient.go). It needs
a real clock reading and a summary that is not just that clock reading;
otherwise it stores nothing at all. A bare hour is not a time, an unread count
is not a time, and "срок 2026.08.15" does not offer 08:15 as a meeting — loose
digits in a notification are far more often a badge or a date, and a mailbox of
noise rendered as invented meetings is worse than a gap.
The ingest is off unless configured: no -ambient-token, no route registered. The
token is a shared secret compared in constant time, because the poster is a
background Android service and WebAuthn has no answer for one. The endpoint is
write-only, accepts one shape of write, and cannot read anything back out.
Reposts of the same notification dedupe against the latest fact for that
key+source, the same append-only discipline cmd/mavcaldav follows.
Not shipped: the Android relay app itself, which is a separate artifact and a
device, not Go in this repo.
The six answer sources were hand-unrolled inside one 127-line function.
The intent table is a closed set of 7, but this list is open-ended —
Kiwix (#286), RSS (#258), the crawler (#259) and email (#246) each add
one. Each is now a registry entry: a name plus a method on the handler,
walked in order until one claims the question.
Order is unchanged and still load-bearing (memory before the notes-only
pass, #373), the confidence gate keeps its position and semantics, and
every reply string, log line and best-effort failure is verbatim.
kami