"что ты записала сегодня?" was recognised as a history question and then
answered with "ты говорил: …". The rows are right — a tapped fact is one act
seen from two sides — but the sentence hands the question back instead of
answering it.
historyAsks returns which side was asked and queryHistory phrases from it,
including the nothing-found reply. His side is tested first, because "отмечать"
is on both verb lists and "что я отметил" is not a question about her.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoL7EBdYC5Mhz3DJd49GJy
historyMarkers were truncated Russian prefixes, so "что я читал рассказ" read
as a history question because "рассказ" is a prefix of "рассказывал". That is
the defect V-528 fixed in complaint.go, where "лаг" matched "лагерь".
A history question is now an interrogative, plus a first- or second-person
subject, plus a verb of saying or recording matched through morph.SameWord.
"что записать?" is a verb with nobody saying it and no longer claims the turn.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Read-only over rows that exist. No new mechanism and no new storage: every
fact he tapped in already carries a source and a timestamp, and the history
source only reads them back.
Only "tap:" sources, and only the last day. A fact written by a poller, an
inference or the ambient relay is a thing she learned rather than a thing he
said, and reading those back under "что я тебе говорил?" would put words in
his mouth. Five at a time, which is what fits in one spoken breath — the rest
are on /history, which is the surface for reading a list.
Above the recall sources, with the others that read his own rows: the notes
pass would otherwise answer this from whatever note is nearest, which reads
as an answer and is not one. The matcher wants both halves of a history
phrase and steps aside when he names a topic, so "что я говорил про сервер"
stays a recall question.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
claude