"расскажи про Байкал" was refused as his by 0.0052. Every world seed
opened with an interrogative, so a world question phrased as an order
landed nearer "я тебе рассказывал об этом?" — the same verb about his
own words. Four narrative seeds on the world side.
TestONNXPersonalBoundary 25/25 -> 29/29 on held-out utterances, and the
control "я рассказывал тебе про байкал?" is still his. TestONNXTopics
unchanged at 34/34.
The topic seeds let "какой сегодня праздник" and "что интересного
произошло сегодня в мире" past the weather source, and the personal
boundary refused them one source further down: "не знаю — не нашла у
тебя такой записи" about a public holiday.
Same defect, same mechanism, one layer lower. "что у меня сегодня" is a
personal seed and worldSeeds had nothing in that frame. Two seeds fix it.
TestONNXPersonalBoundary 22/22 -> 25/25, nothing regressed.
Two recognisers claimed world questions naming a day, both by the same
mechanism and neither by its keyword floor.
topics: weather was the only topic whose seeds carry a day word, four of
eight. So every "какой сегодня X" landed nearest it. "какой сегодня
курс доллара" cleared the margin by 0.0220 and "какой сегодня
праздник" by 0.0398, against 0.0883 for a real weather question, and the
gate asked "для какого города?" about the dollar.
The margin was not the knob: 0.0398 is not a coin flip, and raising the
bar far enough would take real weather with it. topicOther was missing
the negative class. Six seeds, four naming a day and two carrying the
"какой сегодня X" frame itself — a frame both topics use has to sit on
both sides, or the side that owns it wins every noun it has never seen.
personal boundary: the same shape one layer down. "что у меня сегодня"
and "когда моя встреча" put "when does a thing happen" on the
personal side and no world seed answered it, so "во сколько закат
сегодня" was refused as his. Three world seeds, each carrying сегодня,
which is the half of the frame that does the pulling — without it they
caught nothing.
Measured, both opt-in against the ONNX embedder homesrv runs:
TestONNXTopics 27/27 -> 34/34 (7 new cases, none regressed)
TestONNXPersonalBoundary 19/19 -> 22/22 (3 new cases, none regressed)
The control matters as much as the fix: "во сколько у меня встреча" is
the same frame about something that IS his, and it holds at +0.0842,
unchanged from before the seeds moved.
The review comment asked for basic DI. The answer is the idiom voice.go
already had for capabilities — a cohesive *Wiring struct — applied to a
group that is not a capability toggle, plus the decision written down so
it is a rule and not a habit.
recallWiring holds the embedder, the vector store, the personal boundary
and the two numbers that gate an answer. They sat in three places on
reactiveHandler, with the gate numbers a hundred lines from the store
they gate. Its zero value means no recall, so it is a value, not a
pointer like the optional-capability groups.
dataStore stays out of it. patterns.go, ecosystem_acts.go and confirm.go
use it, so it is not part of this cluster.
docs/handler-wiring.md records the choice, rejects a container or a
wire-style generator outright, defers narrow per-handler interfaces to
the package split that would justify them, and states the constraint the
task named: a wiring change does not ride a feature PR.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"что я говорил про бэкапы?" is his data by definition, and nothing outside the
box has ever heard him say anything. The boundary matched possession words only,
so the question walked past it into SearXNG and came back answered out of a Habr
article about somebody else's backups.
A speech-verb marker class was written first and dropped. Russian gives every
verb a dozen surface forms and the "как я говорил, ..." preamble list has no end,
so each form the lexicon missed was one more question reaching the world, and a
missing verb looks exactly like no bug.
The boundary now embeds two frozen seed sets and scores the turn's own query
vector, already computed upstream, against both. Nearest side wins. The
possession markers stay as the offline floor for a handler with no embedder.
19/19 held-out utterances correct against multilingual-e5-small; see
docs/evals/2026-08-03-personal-boundary.md. The live probe on the deployed box is
not done.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
claude