Item 4. actionChat calls h.phraser.PhraseChat, and LLMPhraser posts raw
HTTP to /v1/chat/completions rather than going through the llm client
scriptedLLM stands in for. The simulator wired phraser.NewStub() anyway,
so no scenario could assert what she says on a chat turn: every reply came
back as a pick from fallbacks_ru_v1.json, four variants deep, and the same
scenario returned "тут я пас." one run and "не знаю, честно." the next.
scriptedPhraser embeds the Stub and overrides PhraseChat only, reading the
same script entries the router reads. A reply is accepted in either shape
the phrasing contract allows, the {"response","mood"} object or plain text,
so a scenario writes one thing for both paths.
An unscripted chat turn returns an error rather than a fallback, matching
scriptedLLM: actionChat logs it and uses ChatFallback(), so scenarios that
never meant to assert a chat reply behave as before.
conversation_anaphora turn 4 now pins its text — the reply that asks which
device he means, which is the recorded defect in the box's own words.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Five Russian turns, one monitor, four questions that say "он" and never
name it again. Item 3 of the task: the shape had nowhere to fail, because
the routing fixture scores one utterance at a time and a conversation that
breaks on turn 2 cannot lose a point there.
Routes are scripted exactly as the box produced them on 05-08-2026. Turn 1
files a fact despite "давай поболтаем", the questions go to query, turn 4
goes to chat, and none of the five replies names the monitor. Four steps
assert the reply LACKS "монитор" and are marked WRONG in their notes with
what each must become.
The absence assertion is forced, not chosen. The simulator wires
phraser.NewStub(), and PhraseChat posts raw HTTP to /v1/chat/completions
rather than through the llm client the harness scripts, so a chat reply
cannot be scripted at all. The wrong replies come from
fallbacks_ru_v1.json, which picks between four variants per turn, so
asserting a string would pin the picker. Missing referent holds whichever
variant she reaches for.
Items 1 and 2 stay open: they are owner decisions about which store a
referent comes from and whether "давай поболтаем" claims a turn.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
claude