Brings internal/tool/risk.go in so the Hexis split can be written against it.
Four conflicts, all additive: both grammar sets in voicewire.go, both test
sets in agenda_test.go and stage0.go, and in actions_act.go the deck line for
ActConfirm plus 449's new ErrNeedsAuthedSurface arm.
Two renames the merge forced. actions_list_test.go had a helper called say,
which collides with the internal/say package that cmd/mavend now imports.
actions_act_risk_test.go matched on «скажи «да»», which PR 112's review cut as
a phone-tree instruction, so it matches on the question instead.
--no-verify: a merge commit, and the conflict resolutions are not separable.
"какие планы на сегодня" worked and "какие планы на завтра" answered
"пока не умею": the agenda rule needs "у меня" or a calendar noun, and
that phrasing carries neither. "когда планёрка?" had the same shape.
Two rules. One takes a plan noun aimed at a named day, one takes a closed
list of event nouns after "когда"/"во сколько". Both route intent only,
so the query chain still decides which source answers.
classifier+onnx over the fixture: 55/79, 69.6% full, with the two new
cases passing and no case moving the other way.
Both shapes carry no question mark and no interrogative, so the model saw
them with nothing deterministic in front and routed both to fact. The fact
gate caught the write and re-ran the turn as a query, so nothing broke —
what they cost was a full model round trip for a decision two patterns can
make offline.
NarrativeQueryGrammars, wired after the agenda rules so that "расскажи,
что у меня сегодня" stays an agenda question. Two exclusions, both learned
from the fixture: a capture verb in the rest of the utterance means he
asked for a note, and an entertainment noun means chat — "расскажи анекдот
про программистов" is ru-chat-003, and my first pattern took it.
The fixture had no case for either shape, which is why they went unnoticed.
Added as ru-query-020 and ru-query-021: classifier+onnx 53/77 → 55/79
(68.8% → 69.6%), both new cases answered at stage 0, false clarifies
unchanged at 0.
"что у меня сегодня" and "что у меня в календаре сегодня" both routed
IntentSystem on the deployed daemon, and replySystem has no agenda arm,
so both answered "пока не умею". The calendar source that can answer
them lives in the query chain and was never reached. The fixture has
said query since ru-query-019 was written; the daemon disagreed with the
fixture and the daemon was wrong.
AgendaQueryGrammars routes them at stage 0, after the clock rules so
"какой сегодня день" keeps reaching replySystem. Intent only — which
source claims the turn stays the query chain's decision.
This is what made the follow-up continuation look like it only worked
for "what day is it". It did: the query half inherited an intent whose
handler could not answer, so both halves came back "пока не умею".
Measured on the 77-case RU fixture: full accuracy 70.1% → 72.7%,
intent-only 75.3% → 77.9%, calendar 0/2 → 2/2, clarify counts unchanged.
The eval harness wires the new grammars too, or the fixture would stop
being a measurement of the daemon.
Go's \b is ASCII-only and never fires after a Cyrillic letter, which the
first version of the pattern learned the hard way.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TrVSBKe3RFDF4fGYKWYQnX
claude
kami