Bug: a question writes invented knowledge into memory as a self fact, and recall then serves it back for unrelated questions #99

Merged
kami merged 5 commits from task/470-bug-a-question-writes-invented-knowledge into master 2026-08-03 20:11:13 +02:00
Contributor

Closes Vikunja #470.

Acceptance criteria and quality gate are in TASK.md on this branch.
Review the review, not the diff — leave comments and the agent will apply them via task start 470.

Closes Vikunja #470. Acceptance criteria and quality gate are in `TASK.md` on this branch. Review the review, not the diff — leave comments and the agent will apply them via `task start 470`.
claude added 5 commits 2026-08-03 11:54:18 +02:00
Revert voided the fact row and left the vector, so recall kept serving the
voided fact's utterance and the documented repair reported success on a box that
stayed broken. There was no way to repair a poisoned box at all.

DeletePrefix covers every vector for the key, earlier rows included: their values
are superseded, and a superseded value has no business claiming a turn. It is
best-effort — the audit trail is already committed, and a fact that is voided but
still recallable beats a void that failed.
The predicate a fact write needs before it trusts a routing decision. Tokenized,
not substring: 'что' inside 'чтобы' is not a question. Capture verbs win over
every question signal, because 'запиши что я пил воду' contains an interrogative
and is still a capture.
IntentFact used to persist whatever the model invented for a question-shaped
utterance, at confidence 1.00, and index it for recall under the question's own
text. Two such rows then claimed seven unrelated world questions and silently
disabled world answering.

A question now goes down the query chain, which is what he asked for. The second
half is confidence: a value grounded in what he said stays 1.00, a value the model
supplied for words he never said drops to 0.60 and says so in the log. Same
reasoning as 'LLM output is not authorization' on the act path.
The score gate cannot separate the right note from an unrelated one: the
held-out fixture puts the right note at 0.791-0.890 and the must-be-silent cases
at 0.795-0.835, so a note about his slow network answered 'почему небо синее?'.

RecallAllowed adds a topic veto, and applies it only to a question that mentions
nothing of his. That restriction is the whole design: demanding a shared word of
every recall silenced four true recalls on the fixture to kill one false one,
because recall exists to find the note whose words he no longer remembers. A
question about his own life keeps the embedder as its only judge.
queryMemory and queryNotes both gate on score alone, so both needed it. The
eval keeps its own copy of bestRecall — package main is not importable — and a
fixture that measures a weaker gate than the daemon runs flatters it, so the copy
moves in step and its test pins the new rule.

Measured on the held-out recall fixture with the real embedder: 17/32 cases pass
→ 22/32, false recall 1/5 → 0/5, answered after gate 18/27 → 17/27. The one true
recall lost is en-hard-024, an English question against a Russian note, where no
lexical test can help.
kami merged commit b9371dcac6 into master 2026-08-03 20:11:13 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Reviewers
No Label
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: kami/Maven#99