Files
Maven/cmd/mavend/patterns.go
kami c5317eb2b4 Move the quiet-toggle and pattern-extraction slices out of voice.go (#321)
Continues the decomposition PR #50 started. voice.go 542 -> 365:

  quiet_toggle.go  144  resolveQuietToggle, quietInflections, quietStem,
                        quietTokens, quietPhrase, quietOn/OffPhrases,
                        classifyQuietToggle  (quiet_toggle_test.go already
                        existed for these)
  patterns.go     +44  detectPattern, next to detectAndPropose which it calls
                        and which patterns.go's own header already pointed at

What is left in voice.go is the handler: reactiveHandler, HandlePushToTalk,
handleText, runTurn, applyAction, replySystem, chatHistory, reply.

Move-only: all 133 distinct non-blank lines removed from voice.go were
matched in the two destination files, zero lines added to voice.go. The only
non-move edits are import lists (log added to patterns.go, unicode and
internal/pattern dropped from voice.go) and two comments that pointed at
voice.go for code that is no longer there.
2026-08-01 01:30:06 +04:00

121 lines
4.9 KiB
Go

// mavend/patterns.go — the shared detect+propose step of pattern inference
// (Vikunja #43). Event *extraction* (fact -> action/object) happens at fact-
// write time in detectPattern below, tied to whichever channel wrote the
// fact. Detection — turning a run of events into a proposed routine — is
// channel-agnostic: it only needs what's already in the events table, so it
// runs both right after a voice fact-write (for the immediate "напоминать?"
// confirmation) and, proactively, from the digestion tick (tick.go's
// detectPatterns) over every action+object pair on record, not just the one
// that was just talked about.
package main
import (
"context"
"errors"
"fmt"
"log"
"time"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/pattern"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/store"
)
// detectAndPropose runs the pattern detector over every recorded event for
// action+object and, if a stable pattern is found and nothing has been
// proposed/accepted/dismissed for this pair yet, creates a proposed_routines
// row. Returns (nil, 0, nil) — not an error — whenever there is nothing new
// to report: too few events, irregular intervals, or a pair that already has
// a row in any status. That last case is the one that matters most: it is
// how a routine the owner already DISMISSED stays dismissed forever, because
// the row survives dismissal (status flips in place, see
// store.DismissProposedRoutine) and both the Lookup check here and the
// table's UNIQUE(action, object) constraint refuse to create a second one.
func detectAndPropose(ctx context.Context, ds *store.Store, action, object string, ts time.Time) (*pattern.ProposedRoutine, int64, error) {
events, err := ds.EventsFor(ctx, action, object)
if err != nil {
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("events for %s/%s: %w", action, object, err)
}
patEvents := make([]pattern.Event, len(events))
for i, e := range events {
patEvents[i] = pattern.Event{
FactID: e.FactID,
Action: e.Action,
Object: e.Object,
Ts: e.Ts,
}
}
r, err := pattern.Detect(patEvents)
if err != nil {
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("detect %s/%s: %w", action, object, err)
}
if r == nil {
return nil, 0, nil // not enough data or intervals too irregular
}
// Belt: check first so the common "nothing new" case never even attempts
// an insert. Suspenders: CreateProposedRoutine's ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING
// (backed by the UNIQUE(action,object) constraint) is the actual
// guarantee — this Lookup is an optimization, not the source of truth.
existing, err := ds.LookupProposedRoutine(ctx, r.Action, r.Object)
if err != nil {
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("lookup proposed routine %s/%s: %w", action, object, err)
}
if existing != nil {
return nil, 0, nil // already proposed, accepted, or dismissed — say nothing
}
id, err := ds.CreateProposedRoutine(ctx, r.Action, r.Object, r.IntervalDays, ts)
if err != nil {
if errors.Is(err, store.ErrProposedRoutineExists) {
return nil, 0, nil // lost a race with another caller — not an error
}
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("create proposed routine %s/%s: %w", action, object, err)
}
return r, id, nil
}
// detectPattern extracts an event from the written fact and runs the pattern
// detector. If a stable recurring pattern is found and no proposed routine
// exists for this action+object yet, one is created and the user is prompted
// to confirm via the park() mechanism. Returns the suggestion phrase when a
// new proposal was created and parked; "" otherwise.
func (h *reactiveHandler) detectPattern(ctx context.Context, factID int64, key, value string, ts time.Time) string {
ev := pattern.Extract(factID, key, value, ts)
if ev == nil {
return "" // not an actionable event
}
if _, err := h.dataStore.CreateEvent(ctx, factID, ev.Action, ev.Object, ts); err != nil {
log.Printf("voice: create event: %v", err)
return ""
}
// Detect+propose (Vikunja #43) is shared with the digestion tick's
// proactive scan — see detectAndPropose above. Event *extraction* stays
// here, tied to this fact write; detection over the accumulated history does
// not need to happen right now for the voice path to have already done
// its job — it's dedupe-safe to also let the next tick find the same
// pattern independently.
r, id, err := detectAndPropose(ctx, h.dataStore, ev.Action, ev.Object, ts)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("voice: detect pattern %s/%s: %v", ev.Action, ev.Object, err)
return ""
}
if r == nil {
return "" // not enough data, too irregular, or already proposed/decided
}
log.Printf("voice: proposed routine: %s/%s every %.1f days", r.Action, r.Object, r.IntervalDays)
// Park the proposal for voice confirmation.
phrase := pattern.PhraseRoutine(r)
h.mu.Lock()
h.pendingRoutine = &pendingRoutineConfirm{
routineID: id,
action: r.Action,
object: r.Object,
interval: r.IntervalDays,
phrase: phrase,
expiry: ts.Add(confirmTTL),
}
h.mu.Unlock()
return phrase
}