Files
Maven/cmd/mavend/recall_test.go
kami 98ee701e03 Let a note win a recall, not only a fact (#373)
The memory pass ran only after the notes-only gate had already rejected
the same note at the same score. Notes and facts share one vector index,
so a note that failed there failed again — the branch could only ever
return a fact.

Now the memory pass runs first: one search over everything Maven
remembers, one gate, and the memory that clearly matches best answers
(a note gets phrased, a fact is read back). The notes-only pass stays
behind it for notes the vector index does not hold. No threshold moved,
so the set of questions answered is unchanged — only which memory
answers them.

Fixture gained two mixed note+fact cases, so the answerable count goes
25 -> 27: hash recall@1 36.0% -> 37.0% (ratchet 0.32 unchanged, comment
updated), e5 recall@1 72.0% -> 70.4%, false recall still 1/5.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
2026-07-31 13:30:38 +04:00

78 lines
2.4 KiB
Go

package main
import (
"testing"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/memory"
)
func TestBestRecall(t *testing.T) {
const min = 0.55
const margin = 0.008
t.Run("empty results", func(t *testing.T) {
if _, ok := bestRecall(nil, min, margin); ok {
t.Error("empty results returned ok")
}
})
t.Run("top below threshold", func(t *testing.T) {
res := []memory.Result{{Score: 0.4, Meta: map[string]string{"text": "выпил воды"}}}
if _, ok := bestRecall(res, min, margin); ok {
t.Error("below-threshold hit returned ok")
}
})
t.Run("hit without text meta", func(t *testing.T) {
res := []memory.Result{{Score: 0.9, Meta: map[string]string{"type": "fact"}}}
if _, ok := bestRecall(res, min, margin); ok {
t.Error("textless hit returned ok")
}
})
t.Run("clearing hit returns its text", func(t *testing.T) {
res := []memory.Result{
{Score: 0.82, Meta: map[string]string{"text": "выпил воды в три часа", "type": "fact"}},
{Score: 0.60, Meta: map[string]string{"text": "другое"}},
}
got, ok := bestRecall(res, min, margin)
if !ok {
t.Fatal("clearing hit not returned")
}
if got.Meta["text"] != "выпил воды в три часа" {
t.Errorf("wrong text: %q", got.Meta["text"])
}
if got.Meta["type"] != "fact" {
t.Errorf("kind lost: %q", got.Meta["type"])
}
})
// The index holds notes and facts together, so a note has to be able to win
// it — for a long time it could not (Vikunja #373).
t.Run("a note can win", func(t *testing.T) {
res := []memory.Result{
{Score: 0.86, Meta: map[string]string{"text": "молоко в холодильнике", "type": "note"}},
{Score: 0.61, Meta: map[string]string{"text": "выпил воды", "type": "fact"}},
}
got, ok := bestRecall(res, min, margin)
if !ok {
t.Fatal("clearly-best note not returned")
}
if got.Meta["type"] != "note" || got.Meta["text"] != "молоко в холодильнике" {
t.Errorf("got %v, want the note", got.Meta)
}
})
// The runner-up is almost as close, so the embedder cannot tell the two
// notes apart. Silence beats reading back a coin flip.
t.Run("runner-up too close", func(t *testing.T) {
res := []memory.Result{
{Score: 0.860, Meta: map[string]string{"text": "выпил воды в три часа"}},
{Score: 0.858, Meta: map[string]string{"text": "другое"}},
}
if _, ok := bestRecall(res, min, margin); ok {
t.Error("thin-margin hit returned ok")
}
})
}