Maven/internal/router/llmrouter_test.go

package router

import (
	"context"
	"fmt"
	"strings"
	"testing"
	"time"

	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
)

type mockLLM struct {
	out string
	err error
	got *llm.Req // last request, when the test wants to inspect it
}

func (m mockLLM) Complete(_ context.Context, r llm.Req) (string, error) {
	if m.got != nil {
		*m.got = r
	}
	return m.out, m.err
}

// Without a repeat penalty the model loops inside the text field until MaxTokens
// and the truncated JSON fails to parse.
func TestLLMRouterSetsRepeatPenalty(t *testing.T) {
	var got llm.Req
	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"chat","text":"привет"}`, got: &got})
	if _, _, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "привет", time.Now()); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if got.RepeatPenalty <= 1 {
		t.Fatalf("want repeat penalty above 1, got %v", got.RepeatPenalty)
	}
}

// An unbounded string rule lets one field eat the whole token budget.
func TestRouteGrammarBoundsStrings(t *testing.T) {
	if !strings.Contains(routeGrammar, `{0,120} "\""`) {
		t.Fatal("grammar string rule lost its length bound")
	}
	// And it must not admit a raw newline or a made-up escape, either of which
	// makes the route unparseable and costs the turn its router (Vikunja #537).
	if !strings.Contains(routeGrammar, `[^"\\\x00-\x1F]`) {
		t.Error("string rule admits raw control characters")
	}
	if strings.Contains(routeGrammar, `"\\" .`) {
		t.Error(`string rule still admits "\\" . — \q satisfies the grammar and fails to parse`)
	}
}

// A question naming a fact key used to be stored as a fact because the fact rule
// was tested first. Keep the query rule above it.
func TestRoutePromptTestsQueryBeforeFact(t *testing.T) {
	query := strings.Index(routeSystem, "→ query")
	fact := strings.Index(routeSystem, "состояние/событие → fact")
	if query < 0 || fact < 0 {
		t.Fatalf("prompt lost a rule: query=%d fact=%d", query, fact)
	}
	if query > fact {
		t.Fatal("query rule must come before the fact rule")
	}
	if !strings.Contains(routeSystem, "Задаёт вопрос") {
		t.Fatal("prompt lost the explicit question test")
	}
}

func TestLLMRouterFactMapping(t *testing.T) {
	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"fact","key":"water","value":"выпил"}`})
	d, ok, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "я выпил воду", time.Now())
	if err != nil || !ok {
		t.Fatalf("ok=%v err=%v", ok, err)
	}
	if d.Intent != IntentFact || d.Slots.Key != "water" || !d.Slots.HasKey {
		t.Fatalf("bad decision %+v", d)
	}
}

// A note keeps the utterance, whatever the model wrote in its text field
// (V-576). The note is durable and it is his own words.
func TestLLMRouterNoteMapping(t *testing.T) {
	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"note","text":"ты поедешь на дачу"}`})
	d, ok, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "запомни что кофе закончился", time.Now())
	if err != nil || !ok {
		t.Fatalf("ok=%v err=%v", ok, err)
	}
	if d.Intent != IntentNote || d.Slots.Text != "запомни что кофе закончился" {
		t.Fatalf("bad decision %+v", d)
	}
}

func TestLLMRouterBadJSONFallsBack(t *testing.T) {
	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `garbage`})
	_, ok, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "x", time.Now())
	if ok || err == nil {
		t.Fatal("want ok=false, err!=nil on bad json")
	}
}

func TestLLMRouterReminderMapping(t *testing.T) {
	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"reminder","text":"позвонить маме"}`})
	d, ok, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "напомни позвонить маме", time.Now())
	if err != nil || !ok {
		t.Fatalf("ok=%v err=%v", ok, err)
	}
	if d.Intent != IntentReminder || d.Slots.Text != "позвонить маме" {
		t.Fatalf("bad decision %+v", d)
	}
}

// An intent name that is not in the contract at all (as opposed to "unknown",
// which is a real refusal) still defaults to chat.
func TestLLMRouterChatFallback(t *testing.T) {
	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"banana"}`})
	d, ok, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "как дела?", time.Now())
	if err != nil || !ok {
		t.Fatalf("ok=%v err=%v", ok, err)
	}
	if d.Intent != IntentChat {
		t.Fatalf("unknown intent should default to chat, got %s", d.Intent)
	}
}

// The model must be able to say "I could not route this".
func TestRouteGrammarAllowsUnknown(t *testing.T) {
	if !strings.Contains(routeGrammar, `"\"unknown\""`) {
		t.Fatal("grammar cannot express a refusal")
	}
}

// If the prompt does not tell the model when to refuse, it never will.
func TestRoutePromptExplainsUnknown(t *testing.T) {
	if !strings.Contains(routeSystem, "unknown") {
		t.Fatal("prompt never mentions the unknown intent")
	}
	if !strings.Contains(routeSystem, `"сделай это" → {"intent":"unknown"}`) {
		t.Fatal("prompt lost its worked refusal example")
	}
	// A refusal-only router is useless, so the prompt must also show cases that
	// look ambiguous but are not.
	if !strings.Contains(routeSystem, "здесь unknown не нужен") {
		t.Fatal("prompt lost its counter-examples")
	}
}

// A refusal is not an error. It reports "no decision" so the cascade moves on.
func TestLLMRouterUnknownRefuses(t *testing.T) {
	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"unknown"}`})
	_, ok, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "сделай это", time.Now())
	if ok {
		t.Fatal("a refusal must not produce a usable decision")
	}
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("a refusal is not an error, got %v", err)
	}
}

// The whole point of the refusal: the turn keeps going on the classifier, the
// same way it does when the model returns garbage.
func TestRouterFallsBackWhenLLMRefuses(t *testing.T) {
	c := NewClassifier(NewHashEmbedder(1024))
	seedClassifier(t, c)
	r := New(Config{
		Classifier: c,
		Extractor:  Extractor{Time: StubDateTimeParser{}, Facts: DefaultFactParser{}},
		Threshold:  0.4,
		LLM:        NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: `{"intent":"unknown"}`}),
	})
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "напомни позвонить маме", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	// Stage 1 is the LLM's own answer; the classifier lands on stage 2 or 3.
	if d.Stage < 2 {
		t.Fatalf("want the classifier to decide, got stage %d (%+v)", d.Stage, d)
	}
}

func TestLLMRouterLLMError(t *testing.T) {
	lr := NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: "", err: fmt.Errorf("llm down")})
	_, ok, err := lr.Route(context.Background(), "x", time.Now())
	if ok || err == nil {
		t.Fatal("want ok=false, err!=nil on llm error")
	}
}

// --- slot extraction on top of an LLM decision --------------------------------

// newLLMTestRouter — a router whose route always comes from the mock model.
func newLLMTestRouter(t *testing.T, out string) *Router {
	t.Helper()
	c := NewClassifier(NewHashEmbedder(1024))
	seedClassifier(t, c)
	acts := DefaultActMatcher{Fns: []string{"restart", "stop", "run", "backup"}}
	return New(Config{
		Classifier: c,
		Extractor:  Extractor{Time: StubDateTimeParser{}, Acts: acts, Facts: DefaultFactParser{}},
		Threshold:  0.4,
		LLM:        NewLLMRouter(mockLLM{out: out}),
	})
}

// The model cannot produce a fire time, so without extraction every LLM-routed
// reminder was dropped as "no time".
func TestLLMDecisionGetsReminderTime(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"reminder","text":"позвонить маме"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "напомни позвонить маме через 2 часа", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Intent != IntentReminder {
		t.Fatalf("want reminder, got %v", d.Intent)
	}
	if !d.Slots.HasTime || !d.Slots.Time.Equal(refNow().Add(2*time.Hour)) {
		t.Fatalf("want time now+2h, got %+v", d.Slots)
	}
	if d.Slots.Text != "позвонить маме" {
		t.Fatalf("extraction overwrote the model's text: %q", d.Slots.Text)
	}
}

// No time in the utterance ⇒ no time in the slots. Do not invent one; the
// daemon says it could not read the time.
func TestLLMReminderWithoutTimeStaysEmpty(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"reminder","text":"позвонить маме"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "напомни позвонить маме", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Slots.HasTime {
		t.Fatalf("invented a time: %v", d.Slots.Time)
	}
}

// An act decision arrived with no Fn, so the tool never ran.
func TestLLMDecisionGetsActFn(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"act","verb":"restart nginx"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "слушай, restart nginx пожалуйста", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if !d.Slots.HasFn || d.Slots.Fn != "restart" || len(d.Slots.Args) != 1 || d.Slots.Args[0] != "nginx" {
		t.Fatalf("want fn=restart args=[nginx], got %+v", d.Slots)
	}
}

// The model's own slots win; extraction only fills gaps.
func TestLLMSlotsWinOverExtraction(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"fact","key":"hydration","value":"выпил"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "я выпил воду", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Slots.Key != "hydration" {
		t.Fatalf("extraction overwrote the model's key: %q", d.Slots.Key)
	}
}

// A fact the model left keyless still gets one from the parser.
func TestLLMFactGetsKeyFromParser(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"fact","text":"я выпил воду"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "я выпил воду", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if !d.Slots.HasKey || d.Slots.Key != "water" {
		t.Fatalf("want key=water, got %+v", d.Slots)
	}
	if d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("the parser resolved the key, this must not clarify: %+v", d)
	}
}

// --- confidence / stage-3 gate on the LLM path (Vikunja #359) -----------------

// A single-token utterance is thin evidence on its own — "вода" alone is a
// fact/query coin flip. The gate must ask rather than guess confidently.
func TestLLMRouterSingleTokenTripsClarify(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"query","text":"вода"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "вода", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if !d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("a bare single-token decision must clarify, got %+v", d)
	}
}

// A multi-word utterance with a clean answer must not be punished — the
// whole point is not trading the confident cases away for clarify coverage.
func TestLLMRouterMultiWordStaysConfident(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"reminder","text":"позвонить маме"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "напомни позвонить маме", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("a clean multi-word decision must not clarify: %+v", d)
	}
	if d.Confidence != llmFullConfidence {
		t.Fatalf("want full confidence, got %v", d.Confidence)
	}
}

// "бэкап" alone: the model guesses act, but nothing on the allowlist matches
// "бэкап" as a verb — that must not fire a tool blind.
func TestLLMRouterActWithoutFnTripsClarify(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"act","verb":"бэкап"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "бэкап сделай пожалуйста расписание", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Slots.HasFn {
		t.Fatalf("test setup drifted: %q now resolves to an fn", d.Slots.Fn)
	}
	if !d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("an unresolved act must clarify rather than guess: %+v", d)
	}
}

// An act that DOES resolve to an allowlisted fn must stay confident even
// though its own verb is single-word-ish in spirit — guard against the fn
// check firing on the happy path.
func TestLLMRouterActWithFnStaysConfident(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"act","verb":"restart nginx"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "слушай, restart nginx пожалуйста", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if !d.Slots.HasFn {
		t.Fatalf("test setup drifted, want fn resolved: %+v", d.Slots)
	}
	if d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("a resolved act must not clarify: %+v", d)
	}
}

// A fact where NEITHER the model NOR the deterministic parser can name a key
// must clarify instead of silently writing under an empty/guessed key.
func TestLLMRouterFactWithoutKeyTripsClarify(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"fact","value":"что-то"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "у меня какая-то фигня случилась вот прямо только что", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Slots.HasKey {
		t.Fatalf("test setup drifted: parser now resolves a key for this utterance")
	}
	if !d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("a keyless fact must clarify rather than guess: %+v", d)
	}
}

// The whole point of #359: the classifier cascade cannot be traded away for
// clarify coverage. A multi-word fact the parser CAN key must stay confident
// through the full Router.Route path, not just the raw LLMRouter.
func TestRouterLLMFactWithResolvedKeyStaysConfident(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"fact","text":"я выпил воду"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "я выпил воду", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("a fact the parser could key must not clarify: %+v", d)
	}
}

// A reminder with a time and no subject must come back empty and gated, not
// backfilled with the raw words. "напомни в 11" carries an hour and nothing to
// say at that hour; parking the utterance in Text made the request look
// complete, so the daemon set a reminder that fires saying "напомни в 11"
// (Vikunja #383).
func TestLLMReminderWithoutSubjectAsksInsteadOfGuessing(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"reminder"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "напомни в 11", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Slots.Text != "" {
		t.Fatalf("subject backfilled from the utterance: %q", d.Slots.Text)
	}
	if !d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("a subjectless reminder was accepted, confidence %v", d.Confidence)
	}
}

// The gate is about the subject, not about reminders in general: one that has
// both halves still runs without a question.
func TestLLMReminderWithSubjectIsNotGated(t *testing.T) {
	r := newLLMTestRouter(t, `{"intent":"reminder","text":"позвонить маме"}`)
	d, err := r.Route(context.Background(), "напомни в 11 позвонить маме", refNow())
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("route: %v", err)
	}
	if d.Clarify {
		t.Fatalf("a complete reminder was sent back as a question: %+v", d.Slots)
	}
}