Four paths on the same 72 RU cases with the daemon's own router prompt.
Text in scores 90.3% intent-only. Whisper then route scores 84.7% at p50
1372ms. The workstation transcribing then routing scores 83.3% at p50 997ms.
One call from audio straight to a route scores 54.2%.
The one-call number is not a transcription failure. Four clips it
transcribes word for word it then routes wrong or refuses, and the emitted
slot holds the tail of the sentence with the interrogative head gone. A
3.5k-character classification prompt and an audio part compete for
attention, so transcription needs its own call with a short instruction.
The two speech-to-text paths differ by one case, which is noise on 72, so
the choice is latency and transcript quality. The workstation wins both.
mavgpud.json on the workstation is restored to its text-only args.
claude
b789676244