Files
Maven/cmd/mavend/actions_fact.go
T
claude 3d8224fb04 router, mavend: a complaint about a thing is not a fact about him (V-481)
"сеть какая-то медленная" and "интернет не работает" were written as `self`
rows at confidence 1.00. Recall reads a self row back later as if it were
still true, and that is the class of row that outranked live search in #470 —
so a slow afternoon becomes a standing belief about his network.

IsTransientComplaint is the same shape as IsQuestionShaped: deterministic,
offline, and off by default in the two cases where losing a real capture would
cost more than keeping a complaint. An explicit "запомни ..." wins, because he
asked. A first-person marker wins, because "я сломал руку" is durable and the
test is meant for sentences about things.

She answers the turn as chat instead of storing it. actionChat now has the
same nil-phraser floor the other model callers have.

The second defect filed here — a reply body of literally "{" — was closed by
the errBrokenJSON path in V-397 and needs nothing further.
2026-08-04 03:42:07 +04:00

116 lines
5.2 KiB
Go

package main
import (
"context"
"log"
"strconv"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/ipc"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/store"
)
// actionFact handles router.IntentFact: persist a tapped self-fact, index
// it for recall, and let pattern detection propose a routine.
func (h *reactiveHandler) actionFact(ctx context.Context, dec router.Decision) string {
if !dec.Slots.HasKey {
return "не разобрала, что записать — попробуй иначе."
}
// A question is never a fact about him (#470). "какая последняя версия
// языка Go?" used to land here, and the value stored was whatever the
// model invented for it, at confidence 1.00, indexed for recall under the
// question's own text. Two such rows then claimed seven unrelated world
// questions through recall and silently disabled world answering.
//
// The routing error itself is not fixed here — the answer is to answer.
// Sending the turn down the query chain is what he asked for anyway, and
// it costs a mis-routed capture nothing: an explicit "запиши ..." is not
// question-shaped, so it never takes this branch.
if router.IsQuestionShaped(dec.Utterance) {
log.Printf("voice: fact write refused, utterance is a question: %q (key %q) — answering as a query",
dec.Utterance, dec.Slots.Key)
q := dec
q.Intent = router.IntentQuery
// The key the model extracted is its guess at what to store, not a
// fact he has. Left in place, queryFactByKey would read it back and
// claim the turn before any real source ran.
q.Slots.Key, q.Slots.HasKey = "", false
q.Slots.Value = ""
return h.actionQuery(ctx, q)
}
// A complaint is not a fact either (#481). "сеть какая-то медленная" and
// "интернет не работает" were stored as `self` rows at confidence 1.00, and
// recall reads a self row back later as if it were still true — the same
// class of row that outranked live search in #470. The sentence describes a
// moment, so she answers it and stores nothing. An explicit "запомни ..."
// and anything about him are both left alone by the test.
if router.IsTransientComplaint(dec.Utterance) {
log.Printf("voice: fact write refused, utterance is a passing complaint: %q (key %q) — answering as chat",
dec.Utterance, dec.Slots.Key)
c := dec
c.Intent = router.IntentChat
c.Slots.Key, c.Slots.HasKey = "", false
c.Slots.Value = ""
return h.actionChat(ctx, c)
}
now := h.now()
req := ipc.WriteFactReq{
Ts: now,
Kind: "self",
Key: dec.Slots.Key,
Value: dec.Slots.Value,
Source: "tap:voice",
// Not 1.00 unconditionally any more (#470). A value he said is
// evidence; a value the model supplied for words he never said is a
// guess, and writing a guess at full confidence is the same mistake
// the act path already refuses under "LLM output is not
// authorization".
Confidence: factConfidence(dec.Utterance, dec.Slots.Value),
// Subject: the key doubles as the entity-resolution candidate —
// a voice-tapped fact's key is usually the thing/person it's
// about ("espresso_machine", "kate"), so queueing it for Nexus
// resolution costs one async lookup and is a no-op (not_found)
// for the abstract self-state keys (mood, water) that aren't
// entities at all.
Subject: dec.Slots.Key,
}
factID, err := h.api.WriteFact(ctx, req)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("voice: write fact: %v", err)
return "не получилось сохранить факт."
}
// Index the fact in long-term memory (best-effort, must not fail the fact
// write). Facts aren't in the notes table, so this is the only recall path
// for them — "когда я пил воду?" reads back from here.
//
// The indexed text is the fact, not the utterance (#493). queryMemory
// returns a fact's stored text verbatim, so what goes in here is what he
// hears; storing the utterance meant recall answered with his own sentence
// rather than the value. The utterance stays alongside as provenance —
// readable on /trace, never the answer and never embedded.
if h.memStore != nil {
text := store.FactRecallText(dec.Slots.Key, dec.Slots.Value)
if vec, err := router.EmbedPassage(ctx, h.embedder, text); err != nil {
log.Printf("voice: embed fact for memory: %v", err)
} else if err := h.memStore.Insert(ctx, "fact:"+dec.Slots.Key+":"+strconv.FormatInt(now.Unix(), 10), vec, map[string]string{
"source": "voice",
"type": "fact",
"text": text,
"utterance": dec.Utterance,
"ts": strconv.FormatInt(now.Unix(), 10),
}); err != nil {
log.Printf("voice: memory insert fact: %v", err)
}
}
// Event extraction + pattern detection (best-effort, must not fail the
// fact write). If the fact describes a recognizable action, it becomes a
// normalized event; if ≥3 events for the same action+object show stable
// intervals, a proposed routine is created and parked for confirmation.
if h.dataStore != nil {
if phrase := h.detectPattern(ctx, factID, dec.Slots.Key, dec.Slots.Value, now); phrase != "" {
return phrase // "ты заправляешь ... напоминать?"
}
}
return "" // replier phrases the success reply
}