Files
Maven/internal/phraser/eval/talk_test.go
T
claude 35018226ef eval: score the reply path, the fourth phrasing path (V-396)
Nine reply cases and a fourth column in the talk report. The reply path is a
separate object from the phraser in the daemon, so Pair joins a Talker and a
Confirmer for a run that covers everything Maven says.

Cases carry intent/key/value because the replier is phrased from the decision the
router resolved, not from the raw utterance. Three of them are baits the other
paths cannot produce: a masculine verb about himself that she must not copy onto
herself, a polite plural input that must still come back на ты, and an unresolved
note that invites a question a confirmation is not allowed to ask.

Not scored against a model here — this box has no llama-server, and the baseline
test is opt-in on MAVEN_LLM_URL.
2026-08-04 00:33:41 +04:00

179 lines
6.1 KiB
Go

package eval
import (
"context"
"os"
"strings"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/dialogue"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/llm"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/persona"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/phraser"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
)
// perPathMinimum — the resolution floor. A per-path score built on a handful of
// cases moves by 12% when a single reply changes, which cannot distinguish a
// prompt regression from noise.
const perPathMinimum = 8
// TestTalkFixture — the fixture itself has to be sound before any score off it
// means anything.
func TestTalkFixture(t *testing.T) {
f, err := LoadTalk()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("LoadTalk: %v", err)
}
seen := map[string]bool{}
byPath := map[string]int{}
for _, c := range f.Cases {
if seen[c.ID] {
t.Errorf("duplicate case id %q", c.ID)
}
seen[c.ID] = true
switch c.Path {
case PathChat, PathQuery, PathKnowledge:
case PathReply:
if c.Intent == "" {
t.Errorf("%s: reply case has no intent — the replier is phrased from the decision", c.ID)
}
default:
t.Errorf("%s: unknown path %q", c.ID, c.Path)
}
byPath[c.Path]++
if strings.TrimSpace(c.Utterance) == "" {
t.Errorf("%s: empty utterance", c.ID)
}
if len(c.WantAny) == 0 {
t.Errorf("%s: no want_any — the reply cannot be checked for topic", c.ID)
}
// A query case with no notes would silently score the knowledge path.
if c.Path == PathQuery && len(c.Notes) == 0 {
t.Errorf("%s: query case has no notes", c.ID)
}
if c.Path == PathKnowledge && len(c.Notes) > 0 {
t.Errorf("%s: knowledge case must have no notes", c.ID)
}
}
for _, p := range TalkPaths {
if byPath[p] < perPathMinimum {
t.Errorf("path %s has %d cases, want at least %d", p, byPath[p], perPathMinimum)
}
}
}
// fakeTalker — a scripted Talker, so the scorer is testable without a model.
type fakeTalker struct{ reply string }
func (f fakeTalker) PhraseChat(context.Context, string, []dialogue.Turn) (string, error) {
return f.reply, nil
}
func (f fakeTalker) PhraseQuery(context.Context, string, []string) (string, error) {
return f.reply, nil
}
func (f fakeTalker) PhraseReply(context.Context, router.Decision) (string, error) {
return f.reply, nil
}
// TestScoreTalkCounts — a reply that fails on purpose must be counted on every
// path, so a real run cannot report a hidden zero.
func TestScoreTalkCounts(t *testing.T) {
f, err := LoadTalk()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("LoadTalk: %v", err)
}
// Formal address, off-topic, trailing ellipsis: three checks fail at once.
rep, err := ScoreTalk(context.Background(), "fake", fakeTalker{"Приходите, я вас жду…"}, f)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("ScoreTalk: %v", err)
}
if rep.Total != len(f.Cases) || rep.Passed != 0 {
t.Errorf("got %d/%d passing, want 0/%d", rep.Passed, rep.Total, len(f.Cases))
}
if rep.ByCheck[CheckAddress] != 0 {
t.Errorf("formal reply passed the address check %d times", rep.ByCheck[CheckAddress])
}
if rep.ByCheck[CheckEllipsis] != 0 {
t.Errorf("truncated reply passed the ellipsis check %d times", rep.ByCheck[CheckEllipsis])
}
for _, p := range TalkPaths {
if rep.ByPath[p].Total == 0 {
t.Errorf("path %s missing from the report", p)
}
}
if !strings.Contains(rep.String(), "by path") {
t.Error("report does not break down by path")
}
}
// TestLLMTalkBaseline — the resident model on all four phrasing paths.
// Opt-in exactly like TestLLMPhrasingBaseline: CI has no model and a run costs
// minutes on the CPU target.
//
// MAVEN_LLM_URL=http://127.0.0.1:18099 \
// go test -run TestLLMTalkBaseline ./internal/phraser/eval/
//
// Reports, does not assert a quality bar — the numbers are the input to tuning
// the persona prompt. The one thing worth failing on is a harness fault.
func TestLLMTalkBaseline(t *testing.T) {
base := os.Getenv("MAVEN_LLM_URL")
if base == "" {
t.Skip("MAVEN_LLM_URL unset — point it at a running llama-server (see doc comment)")
}
noProxyLoopback(t)
ctx := context.Background()
f, err := LoadTalk()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("LoadTalk: %v", err)
}
cfg := phraser.DefaultConfig("")
cfg.Timeout = 5 * time.Minute
cfg.ContextBlock = func() string { return persona.Facts{}.Block(time.Now()) }
p := phraser.NewLLMPhraserAt(base, cfg)
defer p.Close()
// Unreachable server is fatal here, not a logged warning, and that differs
// from the nudge test on purpose. PhraseNudge returns its errors, so a dead
// server there shows up honestly in the Errors column. PhraseChat and
// PhraseQuery do NOT: they swallow every failure and return a canned string
// ("поговорили.", "не знаю.", "вот что я нашла: …"). So on these three paths
// a dead server produces a full report with 0 errors and a terrible score —
// a number that looks like bad phrasing and is really no phrasing at all.
// Refusing to score without a confirmed model is the only guard available
// until the phraser reports its failures (Vikunja #397).
model, err := llm.ModelID(ctx, base)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("no model at %s: %v — refusing to score, these paths hide their errors "+
"and would report a plausible-looking result off a dead server", base, err)
}
t.Logf("scoring model %s at %s", model, base)
// The reply path is a separate object in the daemon too: the phraser owns its
// own llama-server, the replier is handed an llm.Client. Pair scores both.
block := func() string { return persona.Facts{}.Block(time.Now()) }
target := Pair{Talker: p, Confirmer: phraser.NewReplier(llm.New(base, cfg.Timeout), block)}
rep, err := ScoreTalk(ctx, "llm ("+model+", built-in persona)", target, f)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("ScoreTalk: %v", err)
}
t.Log("\n" + rep.String() + "\nreplies:\n" + rep.Replies() + "\nfailures:\n" + rep.Failures())
// And again afterwards: the run takes minutes, and a server that died or got
// OOM-killed halfway through would leave the first cases scored and the rest
// silently canned. Checking only at the start would not catch that.
if _, err := llm.ModelID(ctx, base); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("model at %s went away during the run: %v — the score above is not trustworthy", base, err)
}
}