They appear in no compose file and run as no host process, and the task
asked whether that is a gap to close or a decision to write down. It is a
decision.
The reason is not hardware. homesrv is a Lenovo laptop and
/proc/asound/cards lists its ACP mic array with capture devices, so
passing /dev/snd into a container would work. It would also listen to an
empty room. A wake-word daemon is worth having where he is standing, and
that is not where the server is.
mavenclient is a client by name and design, mavwaked is the gate in
front of it, and the wire already reaches off-box: ipc.Dial takes
tcp://host:port?token=... through the netaddr seam, with the token
checked before internal/ipc sees the connection. So this needs a machine
and a config line, not protocol work.
The honest consequence is worse than the task suggested, and both docs
now say it: the wake word and the VAD gate are covered by unit tests and
by nothing else. QA session 1 step 2 was reworded to claim only what it
checks, which is push-to-talk through /dash. CLAUDE.md listed all nine
binaries with no column for where they run, which is how this went
unnoticed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
claude
86dcd99de2