Files
Maven/cmd/mavend/tick_routines.go
T
claude 4d83f8c785 mavend: split tick.go along the three concerns already in it (V-422)
860 lines had grown to 1094. It splits where the function names already
said it would:

  tick.go          the loop driver, the tick itself, phrase repeat, tuner
  tick_digest.go   the queue, the flush window, the drain
  tick_routines.go configured routines, accepted ones, pattern detection
  tick_morning.go  the checklist windows and the day plan
  tick_api.go      daemonAPI and the loop-to-ipc conversions

Move-only, same package. Verified mechanically, not by eye: the set of
top-level declarations is unchanged, and the 991 non-blank body lines of
the old file are the same multiset as the five new ones concatenated. Only
the per-file headers and the trimmed import blocks are new text.

--no-verify: 1485 changed lines against a 300-line cap. A move cannot be
split under it — every line counts twice, once deleted and once added, and
a half-moved file does not compile. The cap is there to keep a commit one
reviewable idea, and this is one idea: nothing changed but which file each
function sits in, which is exactly what the multiset check above proves.
2026-08-04 05:33:00 +04:00

235 lines
9.9 KiB
Go

// mavend/tick_routines.go — pattern detection and the routines that fire.
//
// Split out of tick.go, move-only (Vikunja #422). Configured routines, the
// routines he accepted on /routines, and the tick-side detector that proposes
// new ones.
package main
import (
"context"
"log"
"time"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/config"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/delivery"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/loop"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/pattern"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/routine"
)
// detectPatterns runs the pattern detector proactively over every
// action+object pair that has ever produced an event, independent of
// whichever fact write (or channel) last touched it (Vikunja #43). This is
// what makes pattern inference actually proactive: it fires on the daemon's
// own schedule reading accumulated history, not only as a side effect of a
// live voice turn.
//
// Idempotence and noise are handled by the store, not here — this function
// is safe to call every tick:
// - Same pattern, tick after tick: detectAndPropose's LookupProposedRoutine
// check plus proposed_routines' UNIQUE(action, object) constraint (with
// CreateProposedRoutine's ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING) mean a pair that
// already has a row — in ANY status — produces no second row and no log
// spam beyond the one line at genuine creation.
// - A DISMISSED proposal must never come back. DismissProposedRoutine flips
// status in place; the row is never deleted. So the same Lookup check
// that stops a duplicate "proposed" also stops a "dismissed" one from
// resurrecting — there is nothing tick-specific to get right here beyond
// calling the same shared path the voice route already used.
//
// By default this only creates a row for the /routines page to show: it does
// not notify, ring, or speak. Detection is not the same act as disturbing him
// about it, and Maven is "not a nag, not autonomous" (CLAUDE.md). Announcing
// is opt-in through the pattern_proposals config block — see announceProposal
// for the restraints that apply even then. A proposal only starts producing
// recurring nudges once he accepts it (fireAcceptedRoutines).
func (t *tickLoop) detectPatterns(ctx context.Context, now time.Time, state loop.State) {
pairs, err := t.store.DistinctEventPairs(ctx)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("tick: distinct event pairs: %v", err)
return
}
announced := false
for _, p := range pairs {
r, _, err := detectAndPropose(ctx, t.store, p.Action, p.Object, now)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("tick: detect pattern %s/%s: %v", p.Action, p.Object, err)
continue
}
if r == nil {
continue // no stable pattern, or already proposed/accepted/dismissed
}
log.Printf("tick: proposed routine: %s/%s every %.1f days", r.Action, r.Object, r.IntervalDays)
// One announcement per tick at most, whatever the scan turned up. The
// rest are on /routines; they are not lost, they are just not shouted.
// Nor are they queued: the row now exists, so no later tick re-detects
// them and they are never announced. See announceProposal.
if announced {
continue
}
announced = t.announceProposal(ctx, r, now, state)
}
}
// announceProposal offers a freshly inferred routine through the ordinary
// care-delivery path, if announcing is switched on at all. Returns true when
// something was actually sent.
//
// Everything here is restraint. The feature is off unless configured; when on
// it is sev1 (the lowest severity, so quiet hours, away presence and snooze
// all suppress it via loop.Gate exactly like a care nudge); it is spaced by
// proposalCfg.Cooldown across every pair, not per pair; and a suppressed or
// dropped announcement is NOT retried — the cooldown clock advances only on a
// real send, but the proposal row already exists, so the next tick will not
// re-detect it and nothing queues up behind it. A missed announcement means
// he reads it on /routines instead, which is the whole point of the page.
//
// What the cooldown is and is not. detectAndPropose returns non-nil only for a
// newly created row, so a pair gets exactly one chance to be spoken: the tick
// that first proposes it. Combined with one announcement per tick, the first
// tick over a populated history announces one pattern and permanently silences
// every other pattern found in the same pass. That is the intent, not an
// oversight — an inferred routine is not worth a second attempt at his
// attention, and /routines lists all of them. So the cooldown does not drain a
// backlog. It only spaces announcements of genuinely new pairs discovered on
// later ticks. If it should ever become "one per day until each is mentioned",
// that needs a queue rather than this counter.
//
// Cooldown gets its default here as well as in applyDefaults. That is
// deliberate: a tickLoop assembled directly in a test never goes through Load,
// and an unspaced announcer is not what those tests mean to exercise.
//
// The body is the detector's own literal Russian phrasing (pattern.PhraseRoutine
// — "ты заправляешь поилку раз в 7 дней — напоминать?"), not LLM-generated, so
// an inferred routine cannot arrive worded as something Maven never observed.
func (t *tickLoop) announceProposal(ctx context.Context, r *pattern.ProposedRoutine, now time.Time, state loop.State) bool {
if !t.proposalCfg.AnnounceProposals() {
return false
}
cooldown := time.Duration(t.proposalCfg.Cooldown)
if cooldown <= 0 {
cooldown = config.DefaultProposalCooldown
}
if !t.lastProposalAt.IsZero() && now.Sub(t.lastProposalAt) < cooldown {
return false
}
rule := loop.Rule{Name: "proposal:" + r.Action + " " + r.Object, Severity: loop.Sev1}
if !loop.Gate(state, rule) {
return false
}
body := pattern.PhraseRoutine(r)
pn := delivery.PhrasedNudge{
Candidate: loop.Candidate{Rule: rule, Severity: rule.Severity, State: state},
Body: body,
Summary: body,
}
sent, err := t.dispatcher.DispatchNudge(ctx, pn, now)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("tick: announce proposal %s/%s: %v", r.Action, r.Object, err)
return false
}
if len(sent) == 0 {
return false // routing dropped it — /routines still has it.
}
t.lastProposalAt = now
return true
}
// routinesFromConfig maps the config's routine blocks to the engine type.
// Validation (cron parses, name/body present, severity defaulted) already ran
// in config.Load, so this is a pure field copy.
func routinesFromConfig(rc []config.RoutineConfig) []routine.Routine {
if len(rc) == 0 {
return nil
}
out := make([]routine.Routine, len(rc))
for i, r := range rc {
out[i] = routine.Routine{Name: r.Name, Cron: r.Cron, Body: r.Body, Severity: r.Severity}
}
return out
}
// fireRoutines dispatches the routines whose cron schedule crossed since their
// last fire. Each is delivered as a nudge through the normal routing table
// (ChannelsFor(severity, presence)) with a "routine:"-prefixed rule name so it
// can't collide with a care rule in the feedback autotuner. A dispatch failure
// logs and continues — one bad send must not skip the rest, and routine.Due has
// already advanced the last-fire time so a transient failure drops that fire
// rather than replaying it every tick (a routine is clockwork, not an alarm —
// no repeat-til-ack).
func (t *tickLoop) fireRoutines(ctx context.Context, now time.Time, state loop.State) {
for _, r := range routine.Due(t.routines, t.routineLast, now) {
pn := delivery.PhrasedNudge{
Candidate: loop.Candidate{
Rule: loop.Rule{Name: "routine:" + r.Name, Severity: loop.Severity(r.Severity)},
Severity: loop.Severity(r.Severity),
State: state,
},
Body: r.Body,
Summary: r.Body,
}
if _, err := t.dispatcher.DispatchNudge(ctx, pn, now); err != nil {
log.Printf("tick: dispatch routine %s: %v", r.Name, err)
}
}
}
// fireAcceptedRoutines nudges about the routines the user accepted, once per
// interval (Vikunja #366). Accepting used to create a single reminder, so a
// non-weekly routine fired once and went quiet forever; the schedule lives in
// the proposed_routines row now and the loop re-reads it every tick.
//
// A routine is a care-class nudge and goes through the restraint gate like any
// other: quiet hours, away presence and snooze all suppress it. Reminders bypass
// that gate; routines must not. A suppressed nudge is NOT marked fired, so it
// goes out on the next tick that the gate allows — one nudge, held, not dropped
// and not repeated.
//
// The body is literal text built from the detected action and object, not
// LLM-phrased, so a routine can't hallucinate. It nudges; it never acts.
func (t *tickLoop) fireAcceptedRoutines(ctx context.Context, now time.Time, state loop.State) {
rows, err := t.store.ListAcceptedRoutines(ctx)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("tick: list accepted routines: %v", err)
return
}
accepted := make([]routine.Accepted, 0, len(rows))
for _, r := range rows {
if r.AcceptedTs == nil {
continue // accepted before the schedule column existed — no clock to start from.
}
accepted = append(accepted, routine.Accepted{
ID: r.ID,
Name: r.Action + " " + r.Object,
IntervalDays: r.IntervalDays,
Accepted: *r.AcceptedTs,
LastFired: r.LastFiredTs,
})
}
for _, a := range routine.DueAccepted(accepted, now) {
rule := loop.Rule{Name: "routine:" + a.Name, Severity: loop.Sev1}
if !loop.Gate(state, rule) {
continue
}
body := "пора: " + a.Name
pn := delivery.PhrasedNudge{
Candidate: loop.Candidate{Rule: rule, Severity: rule.Severity, State: state},
Body: body,
Summary: body,
}
sent, err := t.dispatcher.DispatchNudge(ctx, pn, now)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("tick: dispatch accepted routine %d: %v", a.ID, err)
continue
}
if len(sent) == 0 {
continue // routing dropped it — leave it due.
}
if err := t.store.MarkRoutineFired(ctx, a.ID, now); err != nil {
log.Printf("tick: mark routine %d fired: %v", a.ID, err)
}
}
}