9a9f4464d5
The explicit-wrap assertions went in unformatted and make test's fmt-check step failed on them. Found in review of #77.
142 lines
4.8 KiB
Go
142 lines
4.8 KiB
Go
package ipc
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"context"
|
|
"encoding/json"
|
|
"errors"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// The wire must carry the PRF secret, not the credential public key. This is
|
|
// the field rename that fixes Vikunja #14: a v1 deployment sent "public_key",
|
|
// and the value it sent was in passkeys.json next to the wrapped blob.
|
|
func TestUnlockWireCarriesSecret(t *testing.T) {
|
|
secret := bytes.Repeat([]byte{7}, 32)
|
|
for _, p := range []any{unlockReq{Secret: secret}, storeEncryptionKeyReq{Secret: secret}} {
|
|
b, err := json.Marshal(p)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("marshal %T: %v", p, err)
|
|
}
|
|
var m map[string]any
|
|
if err := json.Unmarshal(b, &m); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unmarshal %T: %v", p, err)
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m["secret"]; !ok {
|
|
t.Errorf("%T has no \"secret\" field: %s", p, b)
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := m["public_key"]; ok {
|
|
t.Errorf("%T still sends \"public_key\": %s", p, b)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The secret must reach the daemon hook byte-for-byte through the socket.
|
|
func TestUnlockDeliversSecretToHook(t *testing.T) {
|
|
_, srv, cli, _ := newServerWithStore(t)
|
|
|
|
secret := make([]byte, 32)
|
|
for i := range secret {
|
|
secret[i] = byte(i + 1)
|
|
}
|
|
var gotUnlock, gotWrap []byte
|
|
var gotExplicit bool
|
|
srv.UnlockFn = func(_ context.Context, s []byte) error { gotUnlock = bytes.Clone(s); return nil }
|
|
srv.WrapKeyFn = func(_ context.Context, s []byte, explicit bool) error {
|
|
gotWrap = bytes.Clone(s)
|
|
gotExplicit = explicit
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
if err := cli.Unlock(ctx, secret); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Unlock: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !bytes.Equal(gotUnlock, secret) {
|
|
t.Errorf("UnlockFn got %x, want %x", gotUnlock, secret)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := cli.StoreEncryptionKey(ctx, secret, true); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("StoreEncryptionKey: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !bytes.Equal(gotWrap, secret) {
|
|
t.Errorf("WrapKeyFn got %x, want %x", gotWrap, secret)
|
|
}
|
|
// The explicit flag rides the same request. Without it the daemon cannot
|
|
// tell "he asked for the cold-start key to be rewritten" from "a passkey
|
|
// was asserted", and rewrites the blob on every step-up.
|
|
if !gotExplicit {
|
|
t.Error("WrapKeyFn got explicit=false, want the flag to cross the wire")
|
|
}
|
|
if err := cli.StoreEncryptionKey(ctx, secret, false); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("StoreEncryptionKey: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if gotExplicit {
|
|
t.Error("WrapKeyFn got explicit=true for an implicit wrap")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A refusal from the daemon hook — a wrong passkey, or no prior assertion —
|
|
// must surface to the caller as an error, never be swallowed into success.
|
|
func TestUnlockPropagatesRefusal(t *testing.T) {
|
|
_, srv, cli, _ := newServerWithStore(t)
|
|
srv.UnlockFn = func(context.Context, []byte) error {
|
|
return errors.New("unlock: no verified passkey assertion (assert first)")
|
|
}
|
|
if err := cli.Unlock(context.Background(), bytes.Repeat([]byte{9}, 32)); err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("a refused unlock reported success")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Without the hooks wired — the normal, unencrypted deployment — both methods
|
|
// answer ErrUnknownMethod rather than pretending to have done something.
|
|
func TestUnlockUnwiredIsUnknownMethod(t *testing.T) {
|
|
_, _, cli, _ := newServerWithStore(t)
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
if err := cli.Unlock(ctx, bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 32)); err == nil {
|
|
t.Error("Unlock succeeded with no UnlockFn wired")
|
|
}
|
|
if err := cli.StoreEncryptionKey(ctx, bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 32), false); err == nil {
|
|
t.Error("StoreEncryptionKey succeeded with no WrapKeyFn wired")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Locked mode: Server.Check is the whole authorization surface, and it must
|
|
// default-deny everything except the two methods the unlock flow needs.
|
|
func TestLockedCheckDefaultDenies(t *testing.T) {
|
|
_, srv, cli, _ := newServerWithStore(t)
|
|
|
|
locked := errors.New("locked")
|
|
srv.Check = func(_ context.Context, m Method, _ json.RawMessage) error {
|
|
switch m {
|
|
case MethodAssertStepUp, MethodUnlock:
|
|
return nil
|
|
default:
|
|
return locked
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
unlocked := false
|
|
srv.UnlockFn = func(context.Context, []byte) error { unlocked = true; return nil }
|
|
srv.StepUp = func(context.Context) error { return nil }
|
|
srv.WrapKeyFn = func(context.Context, []byte, bool) error { return nil }
|
|
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
// A store method must be refused while locked.
|
|
if _, err := cli.RecentNotes(ctx, 5); err == nil {
|
|
t.Error("a store read went through while locked")
|
|
}
|
|
// Key wrapping is NOT on the allowlist: a locked daemon has no key to wrap.
|
|
if err := cli.StoreEncryptionKey(ctx, bytes.Repeat([]byte{2}, 32), false); err == nil {
|
|
t.Error("StoreEncryptionKey was allowed while locked")
|
|
}
|
|
// The unlock flow itself must still work.
|
|
if err := cli.AssertStepUp(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("AssertStepUp refused while locked: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := cli.Unlock(ctx, bytes.Repeat([]byte{3}, 32)); err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("Unlock refused while locked: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !unlocked {
|
|
t.Error("UnlockFn never ran")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|