Maven/cmd/mavend/clarify_test.go

package main

import (
	"context"
	"os"
	"path/filepath"
	"strings"
	"testing"
	"time"

	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/dialogue"
	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/ipc"
	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/phraser/eval"
	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/store"
	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/tool"
	"github.com/kami/maven/internal/voice"
)

// newClarifyHandler builds a handler with the clarify path wired and no model:
// stub date parser, the real fact parser, and a matcher over whatever tools the
// test enabled. `now` is fixed so TTL behaviour is testable.
func newClarifyHandler(t *testing.T) (*reactiveHandler, *store.Store, *time.Time) {
	t.Helper()
	st := newTestStore(t)
	api := ipc.NewStoreAPI(st)
	now := time.Date(2026, 7, 31, 9, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC)
	matcher := tool.NewMatcher(api)
	h := &reactiveHandler{
		api:              api,
		dataStore:        st,
		tools:            tool.NewExecutor(api, 2*time.Second),
		matcher:          matcher,
		replier:          voice.NewStubReplier(),
		now:              func() time.Time { return now },
		dialogueSessions: dialogue.NewSessionStore(2 * time.Minute),
		clarifyStore:     dialogue.NewClarifyStore(clarifyTTL),
		extractor: router.Extractor{
			Time:  router.StubDateTimeParser{},
			Acts:  matcher,
			Facts: router.DefaultFactParser{},
		},
	}
	return h, st, &now
}

func clarifyDec(intent router.Intent, slots router.Slots, utterance string) router.Decision {
	return router.Decision{Utterance: utterance, Stage: 3, Intent: intent, Slots: slots, Clarify: true}
}

// TestClarifyQuestionForMissingSlot pins which question goes with which gap, and
// which intents get no question at all.
func TestClarifyQuestionForMissingSlot(t *testing.T) {
	cases := []struct {
		name  string
		dec   router.Decision
		want  string
		asked bool
	}{
		{"reminder without a time", clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни позвонить маме"}, "напомни позвонить маме"), "Когда?", true},
		{"fact without a key", clarifyDec(router.IntentFact, router.Slots{Text: "запиши"}, "запиши"), "Что записать?", true},
		{"act without a fn", clarifyDec(router.IntentAct, router.Slots{Text: "сделай это"}, "сделай это"), "Что сделать?", true},
		// A time with nothing to say at that time is still half a reminder, so
		// the subject is what she asks about — not silence.
		{"reminder that has a time but no subject", clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{HasTime: true}, "напомни в 11"), "О чём напомнить?", true},
		{"reminder that has both", clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "позвонить маме", HasTime: true}, "напомни в 11 позвонить маме"), "", false},
		{"chat is never worth a question", clarifyDec(router.IntentChat, router.Slots{Text: "мгм"}, "мгм"), "", false},
		{"query is never worth a question", clarifyDec(router.IntentQuery, router.Slots{Text: "а"}, "а"), "", false},
	}
	for _, tc := range cases {
		_, got, asked := clarifyQuestion(tc.dec)
		if asked != tc.asked || got != tc.want {
			t.Errorf("%s: got (%q, %v), want (%q, %v)", tc.name, got, asked, tc.want, tc.asked)
		}
	}
}

// TestClarifyReminderCompletesOnAnswer is the whole point of the feature: she
// asks for the missing time and the answer creates the reminder.
func TestClarifyReminderCompletesOnAnswer(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)

	question, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни позвонить маме"}, "напомни позвонить маме"))
	if !asked || question != "Когда?" {
		t.Fatalf("expected the time question, got %q asked=%v", question, asked)
	}

	reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "в 11:00")
	if !handled {
		t.Fatal("the answer to an open question must be consumed as an answer")
	}
	if reply == clarifyGaveUp {
		t.Fatalf("a good answer must not drop the request: %q", reply)
	}

	reminders, err := st.DueReminders(ctx, h.now().Add(48*time.Hour))
	if err != nil || len(reminders) != 1 {
		t.Fatalf("clarified reminder was not created: reminders=%v err=%v", reminders, err)
	}
	if !strings.Contains(reminders[0].Payload, "маме") {
		t.Fatalf("the reminder lost the original request: %q", reminders[0].Payload)
	}
	if h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now()) != nil {
		t.Fatal("the question must be cleared once answered")
	}
}

// TestClarifyFactCompletesOnAnswer — the fact path, where the answer carries
// both the key and the value.
func TestClarifyFactCompletesOnAnswer(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentFact, router.Slots{Text: "запиши"}, "запиши")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("a fact with no key should be asked about")
	}
	if reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "пил воду"); !handled || reply == clarifyGaveUp {
		t.Fatalf("answer should complete the fact, handled=%v reply=%q", handled, reply)
	}
	if fact, err := st.LatestFact(ctx, "water"); err != nil || fact.Key != "water" {
		t.Fatalf("clarified fact was not written: fact=%+v err=%v", fact, err)
	}
}

// TestClarifyAnswerAfterTTLIsANewRequest — a late answer is not an answer.
func TestClarifyAnswerAfterTTLIsANewRequest(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, now := newClarifyHandler(t)

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни"}, "напомни")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a question")
	}
	*now = now.Add(clarifyTTL + time.Second)

	if reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "в 11:00"); handled {
		t.Fatalf("an answer past the TTL must fall through to normal routing, got %q", reply)
	}
	if reminders, err := st.DueReminders(ctx, now.Add(48*time.Hour)); err != nil || len(reminders) != 0 {
		t.Fatalf("expired question must not create anything: reminders=%v err=%v", reminders, err)
	}
}

// TestClarifyAsksThreeTimesThenSaysSo — three questions are allowed, the fourth
// is not, and running out is SPOKEN. Silence would read as "handled".
func TestClarifyAsksThreeTimesThenSaysSo(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни"}, "напомни")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a first question")
	}
	// Two more unclear answers ⇒ two more questions (3 asks in total).
	for i := 2; i <= 3; i++ {
		reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "ну не знаю")
		if !handled {
			t.Fatalf("answer %d must be consumed as an answer", i)
		}
		// The wording changes with the attempt (Vikunja #457): repeating a
		// question he already failed to answer is the worst way to ask it.
		want, _ := clarifyQuestionFor(dialogue.SlotTime, i)
		if reply != want {
			t.Fatalf("attempt %d should ask again as %q, got %q", i, want, reply)
		}
		if first, _ := clarifyQuestionFor(dialogue.SlotTime, 1); reply == first {
			t.Fatalf("attempt %d repeated the first wording: %q", i, reply)
		}
		if h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now()) == nil {
			t.Fatalf("attempt %d must leave the question armed", i)
		}
	}

	reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "ну не знаю")
	if !handled || reply != clarifyGaveUp {
		t.Fatalf("the fourth try must give up out loud, handled=%v reply=%q", handled, reply)
	}
	if reply == "" || strings.Contains(reply, "?") {
		t.Fatalf("giving up must be spoken and must not be another question: %q", reply)
	}
	if h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now()) != nil {
		t.Fatal("a given-up request must leave no armed question")
	}
	if reminders, err := st.DueReminders(ctx, h.now().Add(48*time.Hour)); err != nil || len(reminders) != 0 {
		t.Fatalf("a given-up request must not create anything: reminders=%v err=%v", reminders, err)
	}
}

// TestClarifyMaxAttemptsIsConfigurable — one question when the config says one.
func TestClarifyMaxAttemptsIsConfigurable(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	h.clarifyMaxAttempts = 1

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни"}, "напомни")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a question")
	}
	if reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "ну не знаю"); !handled || reply != clarifyGaveUp {
		t.Fatalf("with max 1 she must give up at once, handled=%v reply=%q", handled, reply)
	}
}

// TestClarifyRestatedAnswerWins — «в 11:00», then «нет, в 15:00». The second
// value is the one that lands.
func TestClarifyRestatedAnswerWins(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни позвонить маме"}, "напомни позвонить маме")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a question")
	}
	// First answer parses, but re-park it by hand as if she had asked again:
	// what matters here is that Answer prefers the newer value over the parked
	// one, which is the case the daemon hits on a re-ask.
	q := h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now())
	if q == nil {
		t.Fatal("expected an armed question")
	}
	first := h.extractor.Extract(ctx, router.IntentReminder, "в 11:00", h.now())
	q.Slots = q.Answer("в 11:00", toDialogueSlots(first))

	if reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "нет, в 15:00"); !handled || reply == clarifyGaveUp {
		t.Fatalf("the restated answer should complete the request, handled=%v reply=%q", handled, reply)
	}
	reminders, err := st.DueReminders(ctx, h.now().Add(48*time.Hour))
	if err != nil || len(reminders) != 1 {
		t.Fatalf("expected one reminder: %v err=%v", reminders, err)
	}
	want := h.extractor.Extract(ctx, router.IntentReminder, "в 15:00", h.now())
	if !reminders[0].FireTs.Equal(want.Time) {
		t.Fatalf("reminder at %v, want the restated %v", reminders[0].FireTs, want.Time)
	}
}

// TestClarifiedActOffAllowlistIsStillRefused — clarification fills in an
// argument, it never grants authority.
func TestClarifiedActOffAllowlistIsStillRefused(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	marker := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "not-allowed-ran")

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentAct, router.Slots{Text: "сделай это"}, "сделай это")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("an act with no fn should be asked about")
	}
	reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "rm "+marker)
	if !handled {
		t.Fatal("the answer should be consumed")
	}
	if strings.Contains(reply, "готово") {
		t.Fatalf("an act that is not on the allowlist must not report success: %q", reply)
	}
	if _, err := os.Stat(marker); !os.IsNotExist(err) {
		t.Fatalf("a clarified act off the allowlist ran anyway: %v", err)
	}
	if tools, err := st.ListTools(ctx, "enabled"); err != nil || len(tools) != 0 {
		t.Fatalf("clarify must not enable a tool: tools=%+v err=%v", tools, err)
	}
}

// TestClarifiedDestructiveActStillNeedsConfirm — the confirm gate survives the
// clarify path.
func TestClarifiedDestructiveActStillNeedsConfirm(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	marker := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "destructive-ran")
	if err := st.EnableTool(ctx, "delete_backups", []string{"touch", marker}, true, "test", h.now()); err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentAct, router.Slots{Text: "сделай это"}, "сделай это")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a question")
	}
	reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "delete_backups")
	if !handled {
		t.Fatal("the answer should be consumed")
	}
	if !strings.Contains(reply, "да") || h.pending == nil {
		t.Fatalf("a clarified destructive act must still park a confirm: reply=%q pending=%+v", reply, h.pending)
	}
	if _, err := os.Stat(marker); !os.IsNotExist(err) {
		t.Fatalf("a clarified destructive act ran before confirmation: %v", err)
	}
}

// TestNoQuestionWhenNothingIsMissing — noise keeps the canned reply, so she
// never invents a question for nothing.
func TestNoQuestionWhenNothingIsMissing(t *testing.T) {
	h, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	for _, dec := range []router.Decision{
		clarifyDec(router.IntentChat, router.Slots{Text: "эм"}, "эм"),
		clarifyDec(router.IntentQuery, router.Slots{Text: "ммм"}, "ммм"),
		clarifyDec(router.IntentNote, router.Slots{Text: "..."}, "..."),
	} {
		if question, asked := h.askClarify(context.Background(), dec); asked {
			t.Fatalf("intent %s should keep the canned reply, got %q", dec.Intent, question)
		}
	}
	if h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now()) != nil {
		t.Fatal("noise must not park a question")
	}
}

// TestClarifyExpiryIsAnnouncedAndWordsStillRoute — his answer lands after the
// TTL: she must say the old request is gone AND still answer the new words.
func TestClarifyExpiryIsAnnouncedAndWordsStillRoute(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := withDialogueID(context.Background(), dialogueIDFor(sourceText, ""))
	h, _, now := newClarifyHandler(t)
	emb := router.NewHashEmbedder(1024)
	h.recall.embedder = emb
	h.router = buildRouter(emb, h.matcher, 0.55, nil)

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни"}, "напомни")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a question")
	}
	*now = now.Add(clarifyTTL + time.Second)

	reply := h.handleText(ctx, "", "как дела")
	if !isClarifyExpired(reply) {
		t.Fatalf("expired question must be announced first, got %q", reply)
	}
	if trimClarifyExpired(reply) == "" {
		t.Fatalf("the new words must still be answered, got only the notice: %q", reply)
	}
	if h.clarifyStore.Get(textDialogueID, h.now()) != nil {
		t.Fatal("the expired question must be gone")
	}
	// The notice is said once, not on every later utterance.
	if reply := h.handleText(ctx, "", "как дела"); isClarifyExpired(reply) {
		t.Fatalf("notice repeated on a later turn: %q", reply)
	}
}

// TestNoPendingQuestionFallsThrough — with nothing parked, an utterance routes
// normally.
func TestNoPendingQuestionFallsThrough(t *testing.T) {
	h, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	if reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(context.Background(), "напомни в 11:00"); handled {
		t.Fatalf("no open question ⇒ must not be treated as an answer, got %q", reply)
	}
}

// TestClarifyAsksAboutTheSecondGapToo — "напомни" with neither a subject nor a
// time. She asks about the subject, he gives it, and the request is still not
// complete. The old code handed applyAction a reminder with no time, which
// answered with a parse error for a question she never asked.
func TestClarifyAsksAboutTheSecondGapToo(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)

	question, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{}, "напомни"))
	if !asked || question != "О чём напомнить?" {
		t.Fatalf("expected the subject question, got %q asked=%v", question, asked)
	}

	reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "позвонить маме")
	if !handled {
		t.Fatal("the answer must be consumed as an answer")
	}
	// Second gap, second attempt, so it is the second wording of the time
	// question — the attempt budget is shared between the two paths.
	want, _ := clarifyQuestionFor(dialogue.SlotTime, 2)
	if reply != want {
		t.Fatalf("a filled subject with no time must ask about the time as %q, got %q", want, reply)
	}
	q := h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now())
	if q == nil {
		t.Fatal("the second gap must leave a question armed")
	}
	if q.Slots.Text == "" {
		t.Fatalf("the re-parked question lost the answered subject: %+v", q.Slots)
	}

	if reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "в 11:00"); !handled || reply == clarifyGaveUp {
		t.Fatalf("the time answer must complete the reminder, handled=%v reply=%q", handled, reply)
	}
	reminders, err := st.DueReminders(ctx, h.now().Add(48*time.Hour))
	if err != nil || len(reminders) != 1 {
		t.Fatalf("expected one reminder: %v err=%v", reminders, err)
	}
	if !strings.Contains(reminders[0].Payload, "маме") {
		t.Fatalf("the reminder lost the subject: %q", reminders[0].Payload)
	}
}

// TestClarifySecondGapRespectsTheAttemptCap — the second gap spends a question
// out of the same budget, so it cannot turn a capped exchange into an endless
// one. With one attempt allowed she acts on what she has instead of asking.
func TestClarifySecondGapRespectsTheAttemptCap(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	h.clarifyMaxAttempts = 1

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{}, "напомни")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected the subject question")
	}
	reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "позвонить маме")
	if !handled {
		t.Fatal("the answer must be consumed")
	}
	if reply == "Когда?" {
		t.Fatal("out of attempts she must not ask a second question")
	}
	if h.clarifyStore.Get(voiceDialogueID, h.now()) != nil {
		t.Fatal("no question may stay armed past the cap")
	}
}

// TestClarifyProseHoldsThePersona — these lines are hand-written Russian that
// the phrasing eval never sees, because they never go through the phraser. They
// carry feminine self-reference ("ждала", "отпустила") and address him with a
// plain imperative, and they are exactly the kind of string someone later edits
// reaching for a synonym. Run the eval's own persona checks over them here.
func TestClarifyProseHoldsThePersona(t *testing.T) {
	// Only the persona checks. Length and on-topic do not apply: these are not
	// nudges, they have no rule to be on topic about, and the expiry lines are
	// deliberately longer than a nudge ceiling.
	want := map[string]bool{
		eval.CheckFeminine:  true,
		eval.CheckHisGender: true,
		eval.CheckAddress:   true,
		eval.CheckCringe:    true,
	}
	lines := append([]string{clarifyGaveUp}, clarifyExpiredVariants...)
	lines = append(lines, clarifyMissedVariants...)
	for _, variants := range clarifyQuestionVariants {
		lines = append(lines, variants...)
	}
	for _, line := range lines {
		for _, r := range eval.RunChecks(eval.Case{}, line, "neutral") {
			// The apology clause of the cringe check is scoped to nudges: it
			// exists because apologising for a greenlit nudge undermines it.
			// These lines are the opposite case. She did not understand him, or
			// she let his request go, and "прости" there is ordinary speech
			// rather than grovelling. Every other cringe rule still applies:
			// pet names, emoji, exclamations, fake concern, praise.
			// checkCringe returns the first break it finds, so this skip also
			// hides a later one in the same line. Kept narrow on purpose: it
			// only fires on a leading "apology (…)" detail.
			if r.Name == eval.CheckCringe && strings.HasPrefix(r.Detail, "apology") {
				continue
			}
			if want[r.Name] && !r.Pass {
				t.Errorf("%q fails %s: %s", line, r.Name, r.Detail)
			}
		}
	}
}

// TestExpiryNoticeSurvivesAConfirmTurn — she asks a question, he walks off, the
// question expires, he comes back and answers a confirm that is still parked.
// The confirm turn used to return before the notice was even computed, so he
// answered the confirm and never heard that the older request was let go.
func TestExpiryNoticeSurvivesAConfirmTurn(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := withDialogueID(context.Background(), dialogueIDFor(sourceText, ""))
	h, _, now := newClarifyHandler(t)

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни"}, "напомни")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a question")
	}
	// A confirm parked with a longer life than the question, so only the
	// question is stale when he speaks.
	h.pending = &pendingAct{fn: "delete_backups", phrase: "удалить бэкапы", expiry: now.Add(time.Hour)}
	*now = now.Add(clarifyTTL + time.Second)

	reply := h.handleText(ctx, "", "нет")
	if !isClarifyExpired(reply) {
		t.Fatalf("the expired question must be announced on a confirm turn too, got %q", reply)
	}
	if trimClarifyExpired(reply) == "" {
		t.Fatalf("the confirm answer must survive the notice, got only the notice: %q", reply)
	}
	if h.pending != nil {
		t.Fatal("the confirm must still have been consumed")
	}
	if h.clarifyStore.Get(textDialogueID, h.now()) != nil {
		t.Fatal("the expired question must be gone")
	}
}

// The other half of the subject question: his answer must fill the empty slot,
// not replace the request. Slots.Text used to be the whole raw utterance for
// every intent, so the branch that fills a text slot could only ever overwrite
// (Vikunja #383). Here the parked request holds the hour and the answer holds
// what to say at it, and the reminder that lands has both.
func TestClarifySubjectAnswerFillsRatherThanClobbers(t *testing.T) {
	ctx := context.Background()
	h, st, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	at := h.now().Add(2 * time.Hour)

	question, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder,
		router.Slots{Time: at, HasTime: true}, "напомни в 11"))
	if !asked || question != "О чём напомнить?" {
		t.Fatalf("expected the subject question, got %q asked=%v", question, asked)
	}

	reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "позвонить маме")
	if !handled {
		t.Fatal("the answer to an open question must be consumed as an answer")
	}
	if reply == clarifyGaveUp {
		t.Fatalf("a good answer must not drop the request: %q", reply)
	}

	reminders, err := st.DueReminders(ctx, h.now().Add(48*time.Hour))
	if err != nil || len(reminders) != 1 {
		t.Fatalf("clarified reminder was not created: reminders=%v err=%v", reminders, err)
	}
	if !strings.Contains(reminders[0].Payload, "маме") {
		t.Fatalf("the answer never reached the reminder: %q", reminders[0].Payload)
	}
	// The hour is the fire time, not a word in the body: the body is what she
	// says at the hour, and the time expression is stripped out of it
	// (Vikunja #469). Clobbering the parked request would show up here as a
	// reminder that fires at some other time than the one he asked for.
	if got := reminders[0].FireTs.UTC(); !got.Equal(at.UTC()) {
		t.Fatalf("the answer clobbered the original request: fires at %v, want %v", got, at.UTC())
	}
}

// TestClarifyIsPerConversation — the parked question belongs to the reach that
// was asked. Before this the clarify store had one global key, so a question
// asked in the web chat and never answered captured the next utterance from
// telegram, or from the mic, and answered it against a request the speaker had
// never made (Vikunja #466).
func TestClarifyIsPerConversation(t *testing.T) {
	h, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	web := withDialogueID(context.Background(), dialogueIDFor(sourceText, "web"))
	telegram := withDialogueID(context.Background(), dialogueIDFor(sourceText, "telegram:42"))

	if _, asked := h.askClarify(web, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни"}, "напомни")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a question on the web conversation")
	}
	if _, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(telegram, "в 11:00"); handled {
		t.Fatal("a question asked on the web must not eat a telegram utterance")
	}
	if _, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(voiceCtx(), "в 11:00"); handled {
		t.Fatal("a question asked on the web must not eat what he says at the mic")
	}
	if reply, handled := h.resolveClarifyAnswer(web, "в 11:00"); !handled || reply == clarifyGaveUp {
		t.Fatalf("the asker's own answer must land, handled=%v reply=%q", handled, reply)
	}
}

// voiceCtx — the mic's conversation, which carries no id of its own.
func voiceCtx() context.Context {
	return withDialogueID(context.Background(), dialogueIDFor(sourceVoice, ""))
}

// TestARestartExpiresTheParkedQuestion pins the Vikunja #385 decision: the
// question dies with the process, and she does not claim to have let it go —
// the words that follow are routed as a fresh request. Restarting is modelled
// the way the daemon does it, by building a second handler over the same store.
func TestARestartExpiresTheParkedQuestion(t *testing.T) {
	h, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	ctx := voiceCtx()
	if _, asked := h.askClarify(ctx, clarifyDec(router.IntentReminder, router.Slots{Text: "напомни"}, "напомни")); !asked {
		t.Fatal("expected a question before the restart")
	}

	restarted, _, _ := newClarifyHandler(t)
	if _, handled := restarted.resolveClarifyAnswer(ctx, "в 11:00"); handled {
		t.Fatal("a question parked before the restart must not eat the next utterance")
	}
	if notice := restarted.clarifyExpiredNotice(ctx); notice != "" {
		t.Fatalf("notice = %q, want silence: nothing survived to expire", notice)
	}
}