Files
Maven/cmd/mavend/actions_note.go
T
claude b705a786ef a note stores his words, not the model's (V-576)
The note body was already the utterance. Two other holes were not.

The LLM router filled Slots.Text for a note from the model's own text
field, and that slot is what the replier reads out. So the confirmation
he heard named things he never said, twice over, differently each time.
The note payload is now the utterance and the model cannot touch it.

A correction with no referent is also not a note. 'нет, не маме, а папе'
names no intent, so parseRepair declines it and it routed as a fresh
note. actionNote now declines it and asks instead of filing it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 01:39:38 +04:00

70 lines
2.8 KiB
Go

package main
import (
"context"
"log"
"strconv"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/phraser"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/router"
)
// nothingToCorrectReply — what she says to a correction that points at
// nothing. Filing it would put a sentence in his memory that reads as a fact.
const nothingToCorrectReply = "не поняла, что поправить. скажи целиком, и я запишу."
// actionNote handles router.IntentNote: embed the note, persist it, and
// index it for recall.
//
// The stored body is dec.Utterance and nothing else (V-576). It is not
// Slots.Text, not phraser output and not any other model string: a note is
// durable, the embedder indexes it, and it comes back later as recall in his
// own words. Phrasing belongs in the spoken confirmation.
func (h *reactiveHandler) actionNote(ctx context.Context, dec router.Decision) string {
// A correction with no referent. Everything that could own one has already
// run by here: clarify, confirm and repair are all resolved before routing,
// so a fragment reaching the note path has nothing behind it (V-576).
if correctionFragment(dec.Utterance) {
return nothingToCorrectReply
}
// An utterance that explicitly files a task is work, not recall, and
// belongs in the task store (Vikunja #130). Checked before the embedding
// is paid for. Everything else is a note, exactly as before.
if reply, ok := h.captureTaskFromNote(ctx, dec); ok {
return reply
}
// A standing list is neither work nor recall (Vikunja #453). Checked here
// for the same reason and at the same cost: before the embedding is paid
// for, and it passes the turn straight back when no marker matches.
if reply, ok := h.captureListFromNote(ctx, dec); ok {
return reply
}
// embed the note text with the same model the classifier uses, persist
// via CoreAPI (source=tap:voice). Semantic recall lives in `notes`, not
// facts — no predicate reads it (spec's two-memory split).
vec, err := router.EmbedPassage(ctx, h.recall.embedder, dec.Utterance)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("voice: embed note: %v", err)
return phraser.Ack(phraser.FailNote, nil)
}
noteTs := h.now()
noteID, err := h.api.WriteNote(ctx, noteTs, dec.Utterance, vec, "tap:voice")
if err != nil {
log.Printf("voice: write note: %v", err)
return phraser.Ack(phraser.FailNote, nil)
}
// Insert into long-term memory (best-effort, must not fail the note write).
// text/ts in the meta make a Search hit self-describing (see bestRecall).
if h.recall.memStore != nil {
if err := h.recall.memStore.Insert(ctx, "note:"+strconv.FormatInt(noteID, 10), vec, map[string]string{
"source": "voice",
"type": "note",
"text": dec.Utterance,
"ts": strconv.FormatInt(noteTs.Unix(), 10),
}); err != nil {
log.Printf("voice: memory insert: %v", err)
}
}
return "" // replier phrases the "saved" reply
}