Files
Maven/cmd/mavend/patterns.go
T
kami 67563ed1f6 Run pattern detection from the digestion tick, not just voice (#43)
detectPattern only ever fired as a side effect of a voice fact-write, so a
recurring pattern already sitting in history went unnoticed until he
happened to mention it again by voice — the opposite of proactive.

Split the pipeline: extraction (fact -> normalized event) stays where a fact
is written, in voice.go, since it's tied to that write regardless of who's
talking. Detection (events -> stable pattern -> proposed_routines row) moves
into shared code (patterns.go's detectAndPropose) that both the voice path
and the new tick.go:detectPatterns call. The tick runs it every cycle over
every action+object pair on record (store.DistinctEventPairs, added), so a
pattern gets noticed on the daemon's own schedule.

Idempotence and the dismiss-must-stick requirement turned out to already be
handled by the store, not something the tick needs to reinvent:
proposed_routines has UNIQUE(action, object) and CreateProposedRoutine does
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING, and DismissProposedRoutine flips status in place
without deleting the row. So a pair already proposed, accepted, OR
dismissed is a silent no-op on every later tick — a dismissed pattern can
never resurface, and re-running the scan never spams the /routines page.
Kept the voice-path call (immediate spoken confirmation is a nice feature
UX-wise and is now redundant-but-harmless with the tick, since both paths
share the same guarded detectAndPropose).

Tick-side detection only ever writes a row; it does not notify, ring, or
speak, keeping Maven "not a nag, not autonomous" — the /routines page is
still the only place a proposal becomes visible, and only accepting it
starts producing nudges (fireAcceptedRoutines).

Also fixed the stale vikunja#46 reference in proposed_routines.go — the
TODO it named is what this commit does.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CGeSZxh1DCtRxmFVSYVGvJ
2026-07-31 23:07:33 +04:00

75 lines
3.1 KiB
Go

// mavend/patterns.go — the shared detect+propose step of pattern inference
// (Vikunja #43). Event *extraction* (fact -> action/object) happens at fact-
// write time in voice.go's detectPattern, tied to whichever channel wrote the
// fact. Detection — turning a run of events into a proposed routine — is
// channel-agnostic: it only needs what's already in the events table, so it
// runs both right after a voice fact-write (for the immediate "напоминать?"
// confirmation) and, proactively, from the digestion tick (tick.go's
// detectPatterns) over every action+object pair on record, not just the one
// that was just talked about.
package main
import (
"context"
"errors"
"fmt"
"time"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/pattern"
"github.com/kami/maven/internal/store"
)
// detectAndPropose runs the pattern detector over every recorded event for
// action+object and, if a stable pattern is found and nothing has been
// proposed/accepted/dismissed for this pair yet, creates a proposed_routines
// row. Returns (nil, 0, nil) — not an error — whenever there is nothing new
// to report: too few events, irregular intervals, or a pair that already has
// a row in any status. That last case is the one that matters most: it is
// how a routine the owner already DISMISSED stays dismissed forever, because
// the row survives dismissal (status flips in place, see
// store.DismissProposedRoutine) and both the Lookup check here and the
// table's UNIQUE(action, object) constraint refuse to create a second one.
func detectAndPropose(ctx context.Context, ds *store.Store, action, object string, ts time.Time) (*pattern.ProposedRoutine, int64, error) {
events, err := ds.EventsFor(ctx, action, object)
if err != nil {
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("events for %s/%s: %w", action, object, err)
}
patEvents := make([]pattern.Event, len(events))
for i, e := range events {
patEvents[i] = pattern.Event{
FactID: e.FactID,
Action: e.Action,
Object: e.Object,
Ts: e.Ts,
}
}
r, err := pattern.Detect(patEvents)
if err != nil {
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("detect %s/%s: %w", action, object, err)
}
if r == nil {
return nil, 0, nil // not enough data or intervals too irregular
}
// Belt: check first so the common "nothing new" case never even attempts
// an insert. Suspenders: CreateProposedRoutine's ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING
// (backed by the UNIQUE(action,object) constraint) is the actual
// guarantee — this Lookup is an optimization, not the source of truth.
existing, err := ds.LookupProposedRoutine(ctx, r.Action, r.Object)
if err != nil {
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("lookup proposed routine %s/%s: %w", action, object, err)
}
if existing != nil {
return nil, 0, nil // already proposed, accepted, or dismissed — say nothing
}
id, err := ds.CreateProposedRoutine(ctx, r.Action, r.Object, r.IntervalDays, ts)
if err != nil {
if errors.Is(err, store.ErrProposedRoutineExists) {
return nil, 0, nil // lost a race with another caller — not an error
}
return nil, 0, fmt.Errorf("create proposed routine %s/%s: %w", action, object, err)
}
return r, id, nil
}