feat(tasks): wire the task tools into role_pipeline
Tool availability is a strict per-stage allowlist, so the task doctrine was inert in role_pipeline — no stage granted the tools. Add them where they fit each stage's tier and role, and point the stage prompts at the lifecycle: - analyst (read-only): task_search/task_context to find related or duplicate work and ground the analysis. - implementer: full set — claim before working, submit_for_review once verification passes, create one if the work warrants tracking. - reviewer: task_context to judge against the task's own criteria, task_update to complete it on an approved verdict. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,12 +4,16 @@ You receive the `impl_plan` artifact (above). Execute it using the tools availab
|
||||
(`file_read`, `file_write`, `file_edit`, and shell). File writes land in the bound workspace.
|
||||
|
||||
Steps:
|
||||
1. Work through the plan `steps` in order. Read before you edit.
|
||||
2. Make the change with `file_write` / `file_edit`. Keep new code consistent with the
|
||||
1. If this work is tracked as a task — or warrants it per the task policy in the context above —
|
||||
`task_context` to load it and `task_update action=claim` before you start; `task_create` one
|
||||
if none exists. Skip this for a self-contained change.
|
||||
2. Work through the plan `steps` in order. Read before you edit.
|
||||
3. Make the change with `file_write` / `file_edit`. Keep new code consistent with the
|
||||
surrounding style, naming, and patterns.
|
||||
3. Run the plan's `verification` commands (build/tests) via shell and fix what fails. Do not
|
||||
4. Run the plan's `verification` commands (build/tests) via shell and fix what fails. Do not
|
||||
leave a step in a broken state.
|
||||
4. When every step is done and verification passes, call the `stage_complete` tool.
|
||||
5. When every step is done and verification passes, `task_update action=submit_for_review` on the
|
||||
task (if any), then call the `stage_complete` tool.
|
||||
|
||||
The decision history above is ground truth. **If the reviewer requested changes** in a prior
|
||||
round, you will see that verdict and its notes above — address those specific points; do not
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user