Two coupled gaps from tracing a real run:
1. Freestyle implements in phase 2 via stages compiled from the architect's
execution_plan (ExecutionPlanCompiler sets allowedTools = stage.tools), so the
static allow-lists never reach it and architect_freestyle.md banned every tool
but the file four. Teach the architect to thread an analysis-referenced task
through the plan: implementing stages get task_context/task_update and claim +
submit_for_review; the final/review stage completes it. No task referenced → no
task tools, and the plan never creates one.
2. Give the analyst task_create so the work is framed as a tracked item up front
(role_pipeline + freestyle). "Read-only" for the analyst means it writes no
files; a task is an event-log entry, not a file write — task_create is T2, so
opening one is approval-gated. The analyst names the new id in the analysis so
the implementer claims it and the reviewer completes it; the implementer now
creates only as a fallback.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Extend the role_pipeline wiring to the other workflows that act on a code work
item, matching each stage's tier:
- freestyle_planning: analyst (read-only) gets task_search/task_context to find
related work and ground the analysis; prompt updated to match.
- review_loop: implement gets the full set (claim, submit_for_review, notes),
review gets task_context/task_update to complete on an approved verdict. Its
prompt files don't ship, so the doctrine rides the L0 policy + tool descriptions.
Left untouched: research (external-research flow producing a report, not a code
work item), qa_ping (smoke test), and healthcheck (diagnostic) — none track work.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
kami