Two coupled gaps from tracing a real run:
1. Freestyle implements in phase 2 via stages compiled from the architect's
execution_plan (ExecutionPlanCompiler sets allowedTools = stage.tools), so the
static allow-lists never reach it and architect_freestyle.md banned every tool
but the file four. Teach the architect to thread an analysis-referenced task
through the plan: implementing stages get task_context/task_update and claim +
submit_for_review; the final/review stage completes it. No task referenced → no
task tools, and the plan never creates one.
2. Give the analyst task_create so the work is framed as a tracked item up front
(role_pipeline + freestyle). "Read-only" for the analyst means it writes no
files; a task is an event-log entry, not a file write — task_create is T2, so
opening one is approval-gated. The analyst names the new id in the analysis so
the implementer claims it and the reviewer completes it; the implementer now
creates only as a fallback.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tool availability is a strict per-stage allowlist, so the task doctrine was
inert in role_pipeline — no stage granted the tools. Add them where they fit
each stage's tier and role, and point the stage prompts at the lifecycle:
- analyst (read-only): task_search/task_context to find related or duplicate
work and ground the analysis.
- implementer: full set — claim before working, submit_for_review once
verification passes, create one if the work warrants tracking.
- reviewer: task_context to judge against the task's own criteria, task_update
to complete it on an approved verdict.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
kami