Run operator-configured static-analysis commands (compiler/detekt/formatters) as a
deterministic harness step on the producing stage, before the LLM reviewer. A stage
declares `static_analysis = [commands]`; after it produces its artifact, each command
runs in the workspace root and the results are recorded in a StaticAnalysisCompletedEvent
(invariant #9 env observation — recorded live, folded on replay, never re-run). A
non-clean command fails the stage retryably with its output fed back verbatim (§2:
compiler/test output is ground truth), so the implementer fixes it and only static-clean
code ever reaches the reviewer. This makes §5's "reviewer context excludes static findings"
mechanical — the findings are resolved upstream, so the reviewer can't waste inference on
what detekt catches for free; no output-parsing, no context plumbing.
- StaticAnalysisCompletedEvent + StaticAnalysisFinding (core:events) + registration.
- StaticAnalysisRunner seam + ProcessStaticAnalysisRunner (whitespace-split argv, stderr
merged, timeout→nonzero exit) in core:kernel; wired (nullable) into OrchestratorEngines
and the server. Null runner / no workspace root → logged no-op, never blocks the run.
- StageConfig.staticAnalysis + `static_analysis` TOML field; runStaticAnalysis folded into
a runPostStageGates sequence (produces → grounding → echo → static analysis).
- Documented `static_analysis` on the role_pipeline implementer stage (commented; commands
are workspace-specific). The reviewer prompt half shipped in 3467826.
New brief_echo stage before the planner in role_pipeline: the model restates
the analyst brief as a structured artifact, and a deterministic gate
(checkBriefEcho, opt-in via brief_echo=true) diffs the restatement against the
original brief. On divergence — dropped requirements (Jaccard coverage < 0.34)
or hallucinated files — it emits BriefEchoMismatchEvent and fails the stage
retryably, so a misread brief never reaches plan generation.
The diff (BriefEchoDiff) is a pure function of two recorded artifacts, so it is
replay-safe and records no observation; the event fires only on mismatch, for
audit. Symbols are recorded but non-blocking in v1. Mirrors the groundBrief-
References gate. role_pipeline only; freestyle_planning wiring is a follow-up.
Runtime install (like research): copy brief_echo.json + brief_echo.md and the
[[artifacts]] block into ~/.config/correx.
The reviewer prompt told the model to judge "the analysis requirements," but
the reviewer stage only needed [patch, impl_plan] — it never actually received
the analysis artifact, so the acceptance criteria it was meant to check against
were never in its context. A reliability gate checking against criteria it
can't see is theater.
- reviewer now needs `analysis`, so the diff is judged against concrete,
pre-stated acceptance criteria (§5 narrow question) rather than whole files
against taste; the §3 minItems enforcement guarantees those criteria are
non-empty.
- reviewer.md operationalizes §5's two principles: evaluate the diff against
each requirement (findings must map to a requirement/plan-step/defect), and
don't re-report what deterministic tools already catch (compiler/detekt/tests
— trust verification, point at failures, don't re-derive them).
This is the workflow-level realization of §5. The full static-first
infrastructure (running static tools as a pipeline step and mechanically
excluding their findings from reviewer context) needs a static-findings event
representation and is deferred. §6 critic calibration needs runtime history
before it can say anything (spec ordering #5).
Local analysts hallucinate file paths the same as planners. A stage can now
opt in with `ground_references = true`: after it produces its brief, every
workspace-relative file path the brief named is checked for existence, and a
path that doesn't exist fails the stage (retryable) with the misses fed back
("Reference only files you have read") so the model re-grounds.
Grounding probes the filesystem directly rather than the repo map — the map
is recency-ranked and depth/extension-limited, not a complete existence
oracle, so "absent from the map" can't be a hard failure. Existence is a
nondeterministic observation, so the result is recorded as a
BriefGroundingCheckedEvent (invariant #9); replay reads it back and never
re-probes.
- BriefGroundingCheckedEvent + GroundingReference, registered in eventModule
- BriefReferenceExtractor: pure, deterministic pull of relative file-path
references from a brief artifact JSON (needs a '/' and a dotted extension;
skips modules, bare names, URLs, absolute/parent paths — so coarse
"subsystem" mentions the brief is allowed to make aren't false-flagged)
- SessionOrchestrator.groundBriefReferences on the post-verifyProduces path,
gated by stage metadata; uses the existing worldProbe
- TomlWorkflowLoader `ground_references` → metadata; role_pipeline analyst
opts in
Scoped to file references with a '/' + extension (not bare basenames, which
a depth-limited probe can't resolve), so a flagged miss is high-confidence.
The symbol-grounding half of §3 is left for a real symbol index.
Scope creep — an implementer writing files it never declared — is the
dominant local-model failure that compiler/tests don't catch. A stage can
now declare a `writes` manifest (workspace-relative globs); a FILE_WRITE
that resolves inside the workspace but outside the declared set is raised
as PATH_OUTSIDE_MANIFEST → BLOCK, so the model gets the violation as tool
feedback and retries within scope (the §2 bounded-retry signal).
Implemented as a plane-2 rule beside PathContainmentRule (same effect-based
dispatch on FILE_WRITE, same symlink-safe WorldProbe resolution, same
recorded observations so replay reads them back — invariant #9). An empty
manifest is unrestricted; out-of-workspace targets stay PathContainmentRule's
concern, so the two rules don't double-flag.
- StageConfig.writeManifest + TomlWorkflowLoader `writes` parsing
- ToolCallAssessmentInput.writeManifest, threaded from the active stage via
SessionOrchestrator.runPlane2Assessment
- new ManifestContainmentRule, registered in the server assessor
- shared candidatePathStrings extracted so both path rules judge the same
target set
- role_pipeline.toml documents the option on the implementer stage
The dedicated ManifestViolationEvent the spec names is not added: the
violation is already recorded replayably in ToolCallAssessedEvent (issue +
observations + BLOCK) and surfaced in the TUI rationale band. A first-class
event is worth adding only once reconciliation consumes it.
kami