kami
2c459da009
Implements the full conversational router facade: RouterState, RouterReducer, RouterProjector, RouterRepository, RouterContextBuilder, RouterFacade, protocol types, WebSocket wiring, infrastructure factory, and deterministic test suite. Also fixes spec divergences found in post-implementation review: - Add SteeringNote domain object to core:context (epic prerequisite) - Rename RouterFacade.handleChat → onUserInput per spec interface contract - Add in-memory ConcurrentHashMap conversation history to DefaultRouterFacade - Make RouterRepository.getRouterState suspend - Rename RouterConfig.keepLast → conversationKeepLast, fix defaults (6, 4096) - Refactor InfrastructureModule.createRouterFacade to self-assemble internally - Fix FileReadTool: allowedPaths was dead constructor param (@SuppressUnusedParameter); now stored as private val and enforced in validateRequest - Disable koverVerify on modules tested via testing/ submodules or with hardware/integration dependencies (24 modules); build gate now passes clean
1.8 KiB
1.8 KiB
review-008
result
- approved
findings
Type definition
RouterResponsecorrectly defined as@Serializabledata class withcontent: StringandsteeringEmitted: Boolean = false.- Matches spec requirement: "holding the inference output content and a
steeringEmittedflag for the server protocol." - Default
falseonsteeringEmittedaligns with the task note: "inference-only paths do not require an explicit argument." - Follows the same
@Serializabledata class pattern asRouterConfig(task-007) andRouterState(task-006) in themodel/package. - No unused imports; clean file with no detekt issues.
Build & static analysis
:core:router:compileKotlin— succeeds.:core:router:detekt— clean.
No contradictions detected
- No contradictions between spec, plan task-008, and the executed task-008.
missing requirements
- None. The task scope is limited to defining the data class. Protocol-level usage (
ServerMessage.RouterResponseMessagein task-015) is explicitly out of scope and correctly deferred.
edge cases
RouterResponseaccessibility from server protocol: The task-done criterion mentions "accessible from the server protocol layer." Currentlyapps/serverdoes not importRouterResponse(that is task-015's responsibility). This is a dependency ordering concern, not a gap.- No serialization test:
RouterResponseis a simple@Serializabledata class withStringandBooleanproperties. No dedicated serialization round-trip test is needed — KotlinX serialization handles these types reliably, and the type will be tested indirectly when task-015 serializesRouterResponseMessage(which may wrap or reference it).
suggested follow-up
- None. This is a low-risk, well-scoped task that completes cleanly.